北电正式申请破产保护,股票代号NT已经被纽约证券交易所取消.

这是一个教训,注意一下RIM


北美的企业和人一样,都是生活在“债务”中,即提前消费。 无可厚非,这是生活方式。

生意好(对企业)和有工作(对个人)时,如在天上; 一旦有危机,马上露馅。

举个例子, 2004年是加国统计局的数据,从油砂提炼的轻质原油一桶的成本是36-40CAD;2008年底的成本是多少? 65-70CAD!!!
 
北美的企业和人一样,都是生活在“债务”中,即提前消费。 无可厚非,这是生活方式。

生意好(对企业)和有工作(对个人)时,如在天上; 一旦有危机,马上露馅。

举个例子, 2004年是加国统计局的数据,从油砂提炼的轻质原油一桶的成本是36-40CAD;2008年底的成本是多少? 65-70CAD!!!

先不要激动。

"Jan 31,2000, A blazing Nortel has been so hot that its shares now carry a price-earnings ratio of 87 on its estimated 2000 earnings, according to Morningstar. "

这是什么意思?如果2000年买入NT股票,利润保持不变,要87年才会赚回投资成本啊。 投资者追风盲目投机。损失就会很大。
RIM虽然泡沫没有NT那么大,但是它靠的是过去几年每年几乎100%的的利润增长,现在看似PE才十几。平均过去3年的利润,RIM的PE是43. RIM的利润要每年增长43%才可以保持现在的股价。

还有POT。。
 
先不要激动。

"Jan 31,2000, A blazing Nortel has been so hot that its shares now carry a price-earnings ratio of 87 on its estimated 2000 earnings, according to Morningstar. "

这是什么意思?如果2000年买入NT股票,利润保持不变,要87年才会赚回投资成本啊。 投资者追风盲目投机。损失就会很大。
RIM虽然泡沫没有NT那么大,但是它靠的是过去几年每年几乎100%的的利润增长,现在看似PE才十几。平均过去3年的利润,RIM的PE是43. RIM的利润要每年增长43%才可以保持现在的股价。

还有POT。。
同意。出来混,迟早要还的
 
No Severance for You! | All About Nortel

By Mark Evans | January 15, 2009

There’s obviously a lot of bad things involved with Nortel’s decision to file for bankruptcy protection but among the most stinging - at least in the short-term - is the that many people who recently left Nortel with severance packages won’t be receiving them. This likely includes many of the senior executives - ex-CTO John Roese and ex-CMO Lauren Flaherty - who were let go last September.
What’s particularly frustrating to many of these employees is Nortel apparently had a 60-day waiting period before they got their severance payment as opposed to giving people their money right away as a goodbye gift/gesture. This meant that many employees who had agreed to severance packages and were waiting for the cash to hit their bank accounts, now get nothing.
Given Nortel still has $2.5-billion in the bank, it must be particularly disappointing for these people not to receive some financial support given they have lost their jobs amid a recession.
For more on Nortel’s severance woes, check out this Globe & Mail story.
 
No Severance for You! | All About Nortel

By Mark Evans | January 15, 2009

There’s obviously a lot of bad things involved with Nortel’s decision to file for bankruptcy protection but among the most stinging - at least in the short-term - is the that many people who recently left Nortel with severance packages won’t be receiving them. This likely includes many of the senior executives - ex-CTO John Roese and ex-CMO Lauren Flaherty - who were let go last September.
What’s particularly frustrating to many of these employees is Nortel apparently had a 60-day waiting period before they got their severance payment as opposed to giving people their money right away as a goodbye gift/gesture. This meant that many employees who had agreed to severance packages and were waiting for the cash to hit their bank accounts, now get nothing.
Given Nortel still has $2.5-billion in the bank, it must be particularly disappointing for these people not to receive some financial support given they have lost their jobs amid a recession.
For more on Nortel’s severance woes, check out this Globe & Mail story.

最倒霉的是去年11月14日周五拿到laid off通知的. 如果不破产,本来今年1月14日可以拿到package的, 可惜了.

去年11月13日周四收到通知的.就应该能在今年1月13日拿到.
 
GE的管理教父教导过他们:“我值这个”。
 
这次我真的搞不懂了,这地步了北电的股票竟然还值钱,而且还在多伦多市场上人模狗样的交易。说起来应当接近零才对。“I Believe“在起作用还是另有黑幕?
 
电台上说今天晚上500多北电员工要聚会,准备采取措施. 保护他们的Package.

看来北电员工也要威胁采取罢工了.看债主们咋整. 几百人搞一把还有成功可能, 几个人就算了.

Important Memo from the Recently Severed Canadian Nortel Employees
Important Memo from the Recently Severed Canadian Nortel Employees

By rscne
To: Mike Zafirovski, Nortel Board Members, and Other Officers of the Company

Cc: Ernst & Young Monitor

From: The Steering Committee of Recently Severed Canadian Nortel Employees

On behalf of all recently severed Canadian Nortel employees, we urge you to overturn your recent decision to deny the payment of promised severances and, in so doing, uphold your stated commitment to the highest standards of business conduct and integrity, as well as provide emotional and financial relief to ourselves and our families in this difficult time. Severance and other employment-related laws were put in place in Canada to reflect what society feels is fair, honest, and respectful treatment of people in this country. We urge you to respect the spirit of those laws and not hide behind the creditor protection laws that give you a choice of whether to recognize severance or not.

We all want Nortel to be successful, so this request is not only for the benefit of those recently severed from Nortel, but for the benefit of all Nortel stakeholders. People are the heart and soul of any successful company, and this is particularly true in Nortel where knowledge and innovation are what differentiate the company from competitors. If your intent – as you say – is to keep Nortel alive in some way, shape, or form, a dedicated and motivated workforce is crucial. The decision you have taken to stay severances is weakening the company’s ability to survive. Today’s employees, as well as tomorrow’s, need to trust that you value their contributions and that you will treat them fairly and with respect. Keeping your word, paying severances, and respecting the rights of employees are all part of keeping Nortel alive.

Nortel has a long history of treating its severed employees (through many rounds of layoffs) fairly, honestly, and respectfully in the face of challenging business conditions. As a result, severed employees who have moved into positions of influence in other companies (including customers and suppliers) have endorsed Nortel, its technology and its people – as many of us will have the opportunity to do when we ultimately find employment. Likewise, in the past, valued employees whose positions have been eliminated have been happy to return to the company when asked back, in part because they had respect for the way they were treated when they left. Nortel’s uncharacteristic “about face” on the matter of severances is having an extremely negative impact on the company’s reputation, as well as on your own reputations. If not reversed, your actions will be remembered – far beyond any restructuring period – as a prime example of failed corporate governance that placed undue emotional stress and financial hardship on employees at a time when they most needed your support.

Equally concerning is that you placed us in a disadvantaged situation because you led us to believe that Nortel would be able “to sustain adequate levels of liquidity” for at least the next year and that bankruptcy protection filings were not imminent. Of note:

On October 16, in a video message to all Nortel employees discussing the upcoming announcements around restructuring, Mike Zafirovski said: “There are no current plans to change our guidelines around severance packages. …I do understand that the last few weeks have been extremely difficult for all of you. I can only assure you that these actions will be unfolded with the utmost respect for Nortel’s people.”


On December 10, in a Wall Street Journal article reporting that Nortel was exploring bankruptcy protection and had started discussions with legal firms as early as September – a Nortel spokesperson stated that “no bankruptcy filing is imminent.” The spokesperson also referenced the fact that Standard and Poor’s had reaffirmed Nortel’s ratings in November, saying the company “should be able to sustain adequate levels of liquidity in the next 12-18 months” despite difficult market conditions.

As well on December 10, Nortel employees were invited to access a URL link to a “Liquidity Fact Sheet”. The Fact Sheet stated, among other reassurances of liquidity, that Nortel had successfully completed debt refinancing in May 2008; that no material debt maturities were due until 2011; that we expected to improve full-year Management Operating Margin by 125 bps over 2007; and that Standards and Poor’s had removed us from the “Creditwatch with negative implications” and had reaffirmed that “Nortel should be able to sustain adequate levels of liquidity in the next 12-18 months.”

On December 12, Nortel employees received another e-mail specifically encouraging them to read an article from the National Post that “better reflect(ed) Nortel’s messaging”. Entitled “Nortel Bankruptcy Fears Considered Premature,” the article stated:

“… While he is cautious about Nortel’s ability to implement a successful turnaround in today’s challenging telecom environment, National Bank Financial analyst Kris Thompson said Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) protection is premature at this point. The company’s earliest bond maturity comes due in July 2011. And even with Mr. Thompson’s pessimistic free cash flow burn rate of $901-million in 2009, he forecasts that Nortel will end 2009 with $1.4-billion in cash.

With no short-term debt obligations and the possibility that Nortel can successfully restructure, we would not expect CCAA as a near-term consideration by the company,” he said in a research note.”

You repeatedly assured us that there was nothing to worry about in the short term, and so you can imagine our shock and disbelief when we learned, on January 14:

  • that Nortel was filing for creditor protection;
  • that Section 73 in the Monitor’s report claimed that “The proposed Monitor is advised by Nortel that without protection from its creditors the remaining available cash resources within Canada could be fully exhausted as early as the second quarter of 2009 and the Canadian companies will not be able to operate”;
  • that the company had made the conscious decision to allow the Monitor to “stay severances” and had relegated employees to “unsecured creditors”; and
  • that we were all suddenly and unexpectedly without any source of income effective that very day.
As you consider our request to overturn your decision, we urge you to remember two of Nortel’s Core Values – “People are our Strength” and “Integrity Underpins Everything.” We also ask that you uphold Nortel’s Code of Business Conduct and take to heart Mike Zafirovski’s introductory words to the Code (which every employee is required to sign as a condition of employment):

“…As you know, we have set the bar high for all of our activities in remaking Nortel into a great company. One of our key areas of focus is ethics and integrity, and my expectations are that every officer and employee will commit to the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance and will act with the utmost integrity. You can be assured that every member of the Board, including myself, has made the same commitment. …

By signing up to the Code, we agree to abide by its guidelines, including all applicable laws and regulations. …In doing so, we commit to report any violation of the Code and to challenge any action that may undermine the principles in this Code and Nortel’s reputation for integrity and honesty.”

We couldn’t agree more. Your decision to stay severances previously promised to departing employees reflects extremely poorly on Nortel and, if not corrected, will severely damage Nortel’s value, reputation, and viability going forward.

We ask that you step up and show responsibility for your employees in their time of need by reversing your decision, as other large companies have done in similar situations in the past. We request that you restore our severance agreements and that you champion employee rights with the same commitment and passion that we have demonstrated as we have relentlessly fought – by your side – in the battle to recreate Nortel into the great company it once was. We urge you to do this for the benefit of all stakeholders and for the company’s ability to survive and successfully do business in the future.

Sincerely,

The Steering Committee of the Recently Severed Canadian Nortel Employees
 
What a well written letter! The Steering Committee must have employed a good lawyer to review it before they published it. Well, that's what you should do when your rights are infringed upon!
 
如果我把nortel的股票买了,是不是可以算投资亏损,去抵税那???
 
后退
顶部