请大家给推荐给高速上网的公司

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ohh
  • 开始时间 开始时间
刚测了一下rogers的速度,download13.05/upload0.37。。怎么能差出这么多呢。。

除了周末网速慢之外,平时还都挺好的

感觉rogers比bell好
 
呵呵 设备提供商 果然是有关联的!
ROGERS有时候会变成内网形态对P2P方式有很大影响 但解决办法还是有的

有空我会去看看,顺便一提如果开始的话应该整个系统都会开始吧? 还要分区开始那才叫麻烦!
=,=b 1000PING?这么惨?偶才20

月流量超过1T 也算是异常用户了 难不成还给个特别待遇不成?
四年半前就发广告推荐我用$199的100M无限制套餐 太贵被偶无视了

有个p关联,bell是最小的用户, 而且我又不是搞Sales的

DPI这种东西都是慢慢deploy的。基本上一个区域一个区域的,毕竟流量大的话设备处理不过来。
被throttle之后就会random丢包,所以ping就上去了,而且随意跳
 
这样啊 那你为何不自我介绍下呢?既然BELL是最小的 那你肯定比他大多了
也让我们多学习点知识啊!
 
这样啊 那你为何不自我介绍下呢?既然BELL是最小的 那你肯定比他大多了
也让我们多学习点知识啊!

bell用的是我们的产品。不过是最近才开始用的(新区)。老区域用的是lucent的stinger.
AT&T是北美最大的DSL客户。

:p

bell用的2wire 2701HG还是一款不错的modem的,只是不支持bridge mode (被bell锁了). 不过自己随便找一款dsl的modem就行了,bell detail:
pppoe
0:35
LLC bridge
mtu 1492
 
bell用的是我们的产品。不过是最近才开始用的(新区)。老区域用的是lucent的stinger.
AT&T是北美最大的DSL客户。

:p

哪一方面的设备?产品?还是啥?
 
哪一方面的设备?产品?还是啥?

阿郎 7330

quote一下dslreport。btw bell deploy的是evlt-k, 下一步就是开始deploy iptv了。据说正在toronto做trial


Bell's trials are very recent, I don't believe they are actually selling service to customers yet. TELUS finished up there FTTH trials a little over a year ago, and have been selling GPON service with internet, voice and iptv ever since.

AT&T, Bell, and Sasktel deployed first generation 48 port VDSL line cards (subsequent firmware updates make them technically able to support VDSL2). AT&T and Sasktel deployed the EVLT-F on the ALU 7330, this card uses the Conexant Accelity 2 chipset, it doesn't support ADSL2+ fallback, only has a limited launch power of 14.5dbm and doesn't support any of the neat VDSL2 modes like VDSL2 8B (reach similar to ADSL2+), 17A (100mbps down, 50mbps up), or 30A (100mbs symmetric). Bell is the odd ball and deployed the Ikanos VDSL lim on the Stinger, it has a virtually identical feature set to the EVLT-F, except the Ikanos VDSL LIM does support ADSL2+ fallback.

Both of these cards have similar downsides in that they have limited interoperability with VDSL2 chipsets from other vendors, they don't (and may never) support features like G.INP (or PhyR), SoS, SRA and only support launch power up to 14.5dbm. On the plus side, both of these cards support VDSL2 bonding, though I'll be surprised if BCM 6368 bonding cpe work (at least without new firmware).

The limited launch power of these earlier VDSL line cards mean rate reach will take a dive above 2500ft and will be inferior to ADSL2+ performance. This actually hurt AT&T as they expected far better rate reach performance, than what the EVLT-F actually gave in field trials, and resulted in less customers qualifying for UVerse than was originally expected.

TELUS did consider deploying the EVLT-F on the ALU 7330, but it would have been a messy roll out, as we have a large existing deployment of ADSL2+. Since the EVLT-F doesn't support ADSL2+, those customers would need new VDSL2 modems, and in some cases they wouldn't be able to qualify for IPTV anymore (due to the limited 14.5dbm launch power, their rate reach would be worse).

This brings us to ALU's next generation 48 port VDSL2 line card; the EVLT-K. This card supports all VDSL2 band plans except for 30A, supports G.INP, SRA, SoS, card-wide VDSL2 bonding (up to 8 ports in a bonding group) and ADSL2+ fallback. The card also has a 2.5gbps interface to the dslam if using the NT-E control card.

One of the most important features on the EVLT-K is it supports VDSL2 8B at up to 18.6dbm, so the rate reach on longer loops should be much better than the Ikanos VDSL2 LIM that Bell uses, or the EVLT-F that AT&T uses. CPE interoperability is also much better, all of our existing ADSL2+ cpe, and various VDSL2 modems (mainly BCM or Lantiq based) all trained up fine.

All of these reasons are why the EVLT-K is being widely deployed on TELUS's network, and is one of the reasons why TELUS's VDSL2 deployment is much better than Bell or AT&T's.
 
借杂谈五毛贴,顶一下:

好贴,值得收藏,大家都顶

看过,的确不错。谢谢楼主

不错的~~! 感谢您提供

这是真的吗?太好了,谢谢您啊

。。。 :D:D:D
 
修正一下上面的quote
EVLT-F是支持adsl2+的。
 
修正一下上面的quote
EVLT-F是支持adsl2+的。

现在 BELL 的光纤怎么工作的啊? 没用BELL电话的,需要 dry loop 么?

这 光纤 和 DSL 的区别在哪?
 
现在 BELL 的光纤怎么工作的啊? 没用BELL电话的,需要 dry loop 么?

这 光纤 和 DSL 的区别在哪?

哪里有bell光纤服务?:confused:
 
哪里有bell光纤服务?:confused:

see these damn corporations...they earn so much profit but they just won't INVEST in infrastures

why do they still deserve a tax cut????

don't vote of conservative
 
前天 BELL 的电话都打到家里来了, 这个 fibe 16 是什么?


http://www.bell.ca/shopping/en_CA_ON.Fibe-16/DSLTIMONNewMassNCOMX04.details?displayButton=true

Fibe != Fiber

这是恶心的Bell的marketing strategy

Fibe什么都不是,就是个名称。其实还是xDSL. 或者你可以管它叫FTTN. 以前的老Bell plan是家里电话线直接到CO (0-5km的距离)。现在是在小区内装7330 ARAMD (或者 7330 ERAMA Remote Aggregator + VSEM-C),缩短信号距离。

Bell好像最近在Toronto downtown在搞正经的Fiber到户。不知道用的是谁的设备,但是是很小区域的test run.

Bell的价钱包括Dry loop, 有没有电话都是这个价
 
see these damn corporations...they earn so much profit but they just won't INVEST in infrastures

why do they still deserve a tax cut????

don't vote of conservative

加拿大这么大个地方搞infrastructure太难了。不像美国,ROI高的离谱

48个用户的一张DSL板卡售价基本上是1w左右吧,不包括控制卡,shelf,external cover, 等等。基本上平均到用户 = 300+$. 差不多得2年才能拿回成本
 
后退
顶部