ZT:野鸡的大学战胜了一流的常春藤

what change then?:) why every time after the con we need to increase tax again in order to get a surplus?:) without con, we don't need to increment the tax to have surplus. strange, don't you think?:)

hey, I just try to follow your brain flow, not mine:blowzy::p
 
well, if history is ever a good indicator. look at the past and look at our neighour in the south...

Well, if history is ever a good indicator, I would like to invite you to have a look at the past five years and compare the Canadian economy with our neighbor in the south and beyond ...:)
 
well, in companies and management, we use forecast to predict the future.

it's an indispensable part of being business savvy

My forecast of the Canadian economy, which I assume is in line with that of the conservatives and conservative supporters and probably the reality, is quite rosy.:)
 
我来歪下楼,问个与选举有点关系的问题:若省选自由党下台,那个自由党实行的full day kingdergarden 政策会不会变?就算不再增拨经费,已经该了full day的不会再改回去了吧?
 
我来歪下楼,问个与选举有点关系的问题:若省选自由党下台,那个自由党实行的full day kingdergarden 政策会不会变?就算不再增拨经费,已经该了full day的不会再改回去了吧?

一般不会。除非被选上台的那个党在竞选时明确说要改变。比如,"Tim Hudak vows to scrap lucrative green-energy deals in Ontario"(http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...een-energy-deals-in-ontario/article2016695/), 那么如果Tim Hudak(安身保守党)上台这个 green-energy deals有可能被取消。
 
后退
顶部