Rogers is proofed wrong by CRTC

Rogers真的恶心到我了。我的是24M网,但是大部分时候只在5M左右。最近又收到他们的信,说是因为他们提供一个加速功能,要从三月份开始多收2元钱。看了这个报道,觉得Rogers是真恶心。
I hope you can ask your money back.
 
一旦情况属实,我相信所有它的用户都可以起诉它,不仅仅是低速按高速收费的问题,还有因为欺骗给客户造成的损失。
 
楼主能不能解释一下网络中立性的问题, 这是一个很有趣的网络话题。
 
etwork neutrality in Canada

Network neutrality in Canada is a hotly debated issue. In Canada, Internet service providers (ISPs) generally provide Internet service in a neutral manner, some notable exceptions being Bell Canada's, Eastlink's, and Rogers Hi-Speed Internet's throttling of certain protocols and Telus' censorship of a specific website critical of the company.


In 2005, when Telus blocked access to labour union blogs during an employee strike, the question of network neutrality became more prominent.[1]

In March 2006, the federal government updated the Telecommunications Policy Objectives and Regulation with new objectives to focus on three broad goals:

promoting affordable access to advanced telecommunications services in all regions of Canada, including urban, rural and remote areas
enhancing the efficiency of Canadian telecommunications markets and the productivity of the Canadian economy
enhancing the social well-being of Canadians and the inclusiveness of Canadian society by meeting the needs of the disabled, enhancing public safety and security, protecting personal privacy and limiting public nuisance through telecommunications networks.[2]

In November 2008, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) scheduled a review of the internet traffic management of ISPs and is still in the review process. The CRTC took comments from the public until Monday, February 23, 2009.

More detail, look here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality_in_Canada
 
后退
顶部