zt: 华为执行副总裁徐直军周二在年度分析师峰会上说:“我们对美国市场已经没有兴趣了”

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 9981
  • 开始时间 开始时间

9981

Nanoriver
VIP
注册
2004-12-11
消息
18,956
荣誉分数
4,265
声望点数
373
http://biz.cb.com.cn/12716612/20130424/462729.html



  【中国经营网综合报道】华为执行副总裁徐直军周二在年度分析师峰会上说:“我们对美国市场已经没有兴趣了”,这被媒体解读为华为放弃美国市场的信号。



  不过,据财新网报道,记者从华为内部人士处获悉,“华为放弃美国市场”的说法系误读,基于美国现实的市场环境,“华为只是不再像以前那样寻求短期内突破政治壁垒,而是自然发展、等待长远的机会”。



  “我们没有看到任何这样(放弃美国市场)的说法。”华为内部人士告诉财新记者,徐直军表达的是,未来在发达市场的增长点不包括美国,“外界可能曲解了我们的意思”。



  徐直军在昨天的分析师大会上讲话的中心意思是,将有限的资源更多地用于实现重要市场的增长当中。



  华为一直积极谋求在美国市场的突破,采取了包括游说美国国会、聘用美国本土员工、与美国本土运营商合作其他业务等多种方式,投入了大量的资源。但是,基于美国对安全问题的考量,华为拓展美国市场的目标并未有大规模的进展。至今,华为在美国市场的终端、企业网业务做得并不大,而在运营商设备市场,基于政治壁垒,美国主流运营商并未向华为敞开大门,份额几乎可以忽略不计。



  “在美国市场久攻不下的情况下,华为将更多的资源转向其他市场,但不是要放弃美国市场。”德国电信咨询公司中国区高级顾问谭炎明对财新记者表示,“以前,华为在美国进行市场攻关投入了大量的资源。华为希望这些投入能够在美国市场打开之后、2-3年内得到弥补。不过,现在综合美国各方面的要素,美国市场的收益短期内很难弥补这块的成本。因此华为不再做额外的市场攻关,这是很正常的选择。”



  谭炎明认为,“退出美国市场”、“放弃在美国市场的拓展”等说法都是曲解,华为虽不再强求快速的突破,但是仍将保持各项业务在美国市场的自然发展,“一步一步的深耕细作,以等待未来的机会”。他指出,华为在美国的终端业务、企业网业务两大领域的许多细分市场,业绩保持增长。



至于美国政府一直强调的安全问题,华为企业业务CEO徐文伟表示,华为的ICT设备已应用于全球近150个国家,都是安全的。华为企业业务BGMarketing与解决方案部总裁张顺茂则表示,“信任是相互的,美国国会的下属机构GAU最新的调查报告显示,没有发现华为有任何网络安全问题。”



  华为在昨日会上预计,到2017年,全球运营商业务、企业业务、消费者业务的市场规模分别将达到3050亿美元、1350亿美元、3300亿美元。在美国市场短期内难获巨大突破的情况下,华为在运营商业务层面寄望把欧洲建成除中国外的第二个本土市场,在企业业务层面则聚焦于中国和欧洲两大地区及重要企业较为集中的26个国家。



  华为还在会上公布了未来五年的发展目标,2013-2017年,华为销售收入将保持10%的年复合增长率。至于2013年,华为预计实现销售收入389亿美元。
 
原本就不该那么早有兴趣。
 
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...m-from-telecommunications-bid/article4600199/

Ottawa set to ban Chinese firm from telecommunications bid Add to ...
STEVEN CHASE

OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail

Published Wednesday, Oct. 10 2012, 6:00 AM EDT

Last updated Wednesday, Oct. 10 2012, 4:17 AM EDT
557 comments
280

163

88

29

Print /
License AA Citing a rarely used national-security protocol, Ottawa has sent a signal to Chinese telecom equipment giant Huawei Technologies that it would block the firm from bidding to build the Canadian government’s latest telecommunications and e-mail network.

Shenzen-based Huawei is riding a storm of suspicion. On Monday, a powerful U.S. congressional committee called the company a threat to U.S. security and recommended that its products be excluded from government computer systems. Canada’s national surveillance and cryptology agency, the Communications Security Establishment, has warned the military of potential security risks in installing Huawei’s equipment.

More Related to this Story
•Canada needs to take threat of Chinese cyberespionage more seriously: former top spy

•security Ottawa casts wary eye on Chinese telecom giant

•China rejects U.S. accusations against telecoms firms
China's top telecom gear makers' dreams of U.S. expansion are now in a tailspin after a congressional report urged blocking Huawei and ZTE from the market on security concerns. Reuters
video
Video: Telecom tiff a wake-up call for China-U.S. relations


Telecom
Video: U.S. report slams China's Huawei, ZTE

Tech
Video: Huawei shows off its hottest handsets

The chill in relations with one Chinese company comes as the Harper government works to define an evolving relationship. The Conservatives are contemplating allowing a state-owned Chinese firm to buy a piece of the oil sands and are being encouraged by Beijing to enter into free-trade talks.

A spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper fielding questions about Huawei on Tuesday said Ottawa recently invoked an infrequently used national-security exception that allows it to override trade agreement obligations and restrict bidders on contracts to supply parts of what’s been called Ottawa’s super network: a secure, centralized pipe for e-mail, phone calls and data.

Ottawa is being coy about which countries or suppliers will be locked out. But Mr. Harper’s director of communications hinted strongly that Huawei would be left in the cold.

“The government is going to be choosing carefully in the construction of this network and it has invoked the national security exception for the building of this network,” Andrew MacDougall told reporters during an unrelated briefing.

“I’ll leave it to you if you think that Huawei should be a part of [the] Canadian government security system,” Mr. MacDougall said.

Also Tuesday, one of Canada’s former top spies spoke out against granting Huawei a foothold in Ottawa’s sensitive phone and e-mail system.

“They pose enough of a threat perspective that I wouldn’t let them into any government networks,” Ray Boisvert, who was assistant director of intelligence for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service until he retired six months ago.

“They’re linked and tied to the Chinese state, and in my view they would, when asked, facilitate the interests of the Chinese military or the security intelligence apparatus,” he said of the privately owned Huawei.

Mr. Boisvert said damage from economic espionage is now on par with the threat posed by al-Qaeda. “It has become equal to the threat of terrorism. Why? It has such long-term repercussions. The future prosperity of Canadians.”

Huawei, which in just two decades has grown big enough to rival Sweden’s Ericsson as the No. 1 maker of telecommunications equipment in the world, is making inroads into Canada’s private sector. It’s now supplying major wireless firms, including Bell and Telus, as well as SaskTel and Wind Mobile.

It racked up more than $32-billion in sales in 2011, and has more than 140,000 employees worldwide, including more than 450 in Canada.

Huawei, founded by a former People’s Liberation Army member, has on numerous occasions rejected claims its equipment could be used to enable spying.

A spokesman for Huawei’s Canadian unit said it has received no signal that it would be barred from bidding for any federal government computer or telecom contract.

“We’ve had no indication either way – as would be expected,” Scott Bradley said on Tuesday.

Mr. Boisvert said he couldn’t imagine China allowing foreign companies deep into its national infrastructure.

“I don’t think Cisco or Alcatel-Lucent would be allowed to bid on the Beijing telephone network, let alone the government of China’s,” he said.

Australia recently banned Huawei’s Australian unit from bidding for its $38-billion broadband network project, citing the need to protect “national interests.”

Top-secret Canadian government documents written as recently as May 17 and obtained by The Globe and Mail under the access-to-information law show that the CSE has cast a wary eye on Huawei.

One presentation, which discusses the damage foreign adversaries can inflict on computer systems, mentions the “Farewell dossier” incident. That was a Cold War episode in which the Central Intelligence Agency was reported to have deliberately transferred faulty technology to the Soviets – including a computer virus that triggered a major pipeline explosion.

In 2010, Huawei announced it was investing $67-million in its research and development centre in Ottawa, including a $6.5-million grant from the Ontario government.

The national security exception Ottawa is using can be employed to exclude the use of equipment produced or certified in certain countries.
 
不会放弃大家拿的,莫担心
 
不会放弃大家拿的,莫担心

华为俩客户,WIND/ MOBILICITY最近都撑不下去,找买家呢。。中国移动不如都买了,华为想干啥干啥。。。
 
华为俩客户,WIND/ MOBILICITY最近都撑不下去,找买家呢。。中国移动不如都买了,华为想干啥干啥。。。

有两朋友,在华为ottawa干得风生水起的啊
 
华为俩客户,WIND/ MOBILICITY最近都撑不下去,找买家呢。。中国移动不如都买了,华为想干啥干啥。。。



移动不可能进来
 
后退
顶部