资本主义的慈善公司(基金)是以盈利为目的的(原创)

Outdated news, right?

Six-figure salaries the norm at top charities


Charities who paid execs more than $350,000 in 2009

Figures are from Canada Revenue Agency filings

All from 2009 annual filings with CRA (note only a handful of charities have filed 09 reports yet)

$350,000 or more:

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
St. Michael's Hospital Foundation, Toronto
York University Foundation
Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation, Toronto
Montreal General Hospital Foundation

$300,000 to $350,000:

Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation, Toronto
Plan International Canada (formerly Foster Parents Plan)
Heart & Stroke Foundation of Ontario
YMCA of Greater Toronto


$250,000 to $300,000:

Toronto General & Western Hospital Foundation (4 people)
British Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation
VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation in Vancouver

$200,000 to $250,000:

Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Division
Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada
World Wildlife Fund Canada
Salvation Army Territorial Headquarters
Hockey Hall of Fame and Museum
Canadian Red Cross
 
Some of Canada's largest and best-known charities are paying top officials more than $300,000 annually, government filings show.

Top earners include executives at Plan International Canada Inc., Heart & Stroke Foundation of Ontario, York University Foundation and five hospital foundations. Those charities all paid their chief executives more than $300,000 last year and some, including York, doled out more than $350,000.

Several other charities - including the British Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation and Toronto General & Western Hospital Foundation - paid top executives between $250,000 and $300,000. And still others, including the Canadian Red Cross, paid officials between $200,000 and $250,000.

The compensation figures are contained in the charities' 2009 filings with the Canada Revenue Agency and they mark the first time Canadian charities have disclosed compensation information for their ten highest-paid officials. Previously charities only had to provide limited information about their five best-paid officers.

The new filings still offer an incomplete picture. There are no exact salary figures or names of the highest-paid individuals. Instead, charities must identify the number of people who earn a salary within a certain range, with the top range "$350,000 and over."

Compensation among charities has been a hot topic since last fall when Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children revealed it paid its former president $2.7-million in 2008.

Liberal MP Albina Guarnieri recently introduced a private member's bill to require charities to reveal details about their five highest-paid executives and cap salaries at $250,000.

Ms. Guarnieri said Tuesday that the more expanded disclosure in the CRA filing doesn't go far enough.

The new form "doesn't really provide the donor with the type of disclosure that he really deserves," she said. "What I am asking is for the same disclosure that companies have to give to their shareholders and that governments give taxpayers."

Ted Garrard, chief executive of Sick Kids Foundation, whose annual salary is $400,000 plus up to $100,000 as a bonus, agreed that more disclosure was needed. "Donors, like shareholders, should have the opportunity to know," he said Tuesday.

But others say focusing on salaries alone is a red herring.

"I have yet to be convinced [excessive compensation]is a serious problem within our sector," said Mark Blumberg, a Toronto lawyer who specializes in charity law.

Mr. Blumberg said most charities pay little or nothing in the way of salaries and forcing them to disclose more information will take up badly needed resources. He added that there are many other areas where better disclosure is needed, such as requiring charities to offer details about the effectiveness of their programs.

Don McCreesh, chairman of Imagine Canada, a charity umbrella organization, added that capping salaries at $250,000 is unworkable. "Some of these charities are big complex organizations and you need some skilled people running them," he said. "If I'm giving money to a big complex organization I want to make sure it's managed right and that may mean paying somebody more than $250,000."

Tim Price, chairman of the York University Foundation board, said the foundation paid CEO Paul Marcus $394,000 in salary and bonus last year. The payment "was in the context of the competitiveness of talent to be able to get a first-class person," Mr. Price said. The foundation was established to create for the university a top notch fundraising operation. "And we wanted to hire the very best talent."

Salary disclosure by charities is haphazard in Canada and some organizations are forced to reveal more than others. For example, a few Canadian charities have offices in the United States, like Sick Kids Foundation, and they must file annual reports with the Internal Revenue Service, which requires detailed information about all executive compensation. Some organizations receiving provincial grants also end up on lists like Ontario's so-called sunshine list, which publishes salaries of public servants and others earning more than $100,000 annually.

But Ontario's list is inconsistent. For example, the 2010 report included salaries of executives at charities such as the CNIB and the YMCA. However, charitable foundations are exempt, meaning there was no salary information about officials running foundations such as The Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation or St. Michael's Hospital. CRA filings show CEOs at both are paid more than $350,000.
 
慈善公司(基金)的高层是高收入,在这里是不奇怪的。那些做慈善义工的小人物,是有爱心,还是应鼓励。
 
世人大都是自私的, 不管白的黑的黄的红的. 各类晃子随风飘啊, 想带走你兜里被政府抽税后剩下的几个子.
 
资本主义的慈善公司(基金)是以盈利为目的的(原创)



大凡捐款,大部分捐款人都希望所有善款都能被用到救济灾民或者救助需要救济者的用途上,比如:衣食住行的费用、重建的费用、上学的费用、重新启动的费用等等。但资本主义国家的慈善公司(基金)是以盈利为目的的,兼顾救济。为什么这么说呢?因为这些慈善公司(基金)名为慈善,实际上是私人企业。既然是私人企业,那就需要大量运作资金,并以利润为考量。但钱从哪里来呢?答案就是捐款。采用的方式就是雁过拔毛的方式。因此在资本家眼里,慈善是资本的盛宴。



以加拿大红十字会为例,该会抽取10%到15%的费用。该会的经理人员的工资在2009年是20万到25万加元。而其它的一些基金会的经理人员的工资有的高达40万加元外加10万加元的奖金。这些钱全部出自捐款人的捐款。人们不禁要问,慈善公司(基金)的经理人员真的需要有这么高的工资吗?真的需要这么高的奖金吗?慈善公司(基金)的人为什么看上去是在敛财呢?经理人员的工资如此,其他雇员的工资大概也不会低到哪里去。这些加起来应该能超过百万或者千万加元。人们不禁也要问,为什么一定要以百万加元或者千万加元的抽头来办慈善公司(基金)呢?这些钱全用在灾民或者受害者身上岂不更好吗?



那么为什么会有10万加元奖金呢?那就是因为是以利润为考量。小的慈善公司(基金)为了生存,估计会采用广告销售人员的方式来索取捐款。捐款越多,抽头也就越多,抽头越多奖金才能越多。大的慈善公司(基金)还可能发行彩票,鼓励人们捐款,以小利搏大利,最终也是钱越多,抽头越多,奖金越多。所以说资本主义的慈善公司(基金)是以盈利为目的的,兼顾救济。



海外华人是很聪明的,却不谙慈善公司(基金)的本质,或者说是起步晚,慈善市场已经被瓜分了。否则应该有一些各行各业和各种名目的慈善公司(基金)如雨后春笋般地诞生,百花齐放,百家争鸣岂不更好?

说话要有根据,不要信口开河!
 
原创好象很牛的样子,还扩号特别指出呢:D:D:D
 
慈善公司(基金)的高层是高收入,在这里是不奇怪的。那些做慈善义工的小人物,是有爱心,还是应鼓励。

加拿大慈善公司是非政府机构,账目是公开的,接受第三方财务调查。

中国的红十字会是政府机构,账目是不公开的,不接受第三方财务调查,只受上级党委领导。
 
加拿大红会可没有郭妖精!
 
无它。。。。先把帐本帖出来再说,帐都不干让人看那就不是赢利而是贪污。。。
 
加拿大慈善公司是非政府机构,账目是公开的,接受第三方财务调查。



中国的红十字会是政府机构,账目是不公开的,不接受第三方财务调查,只受上级党委领导。



上次谁也是这么说的,说中国的红十字会不是国际红会的会员,我去查了查,不得要领,你有没有来源连接我看看。:blowzy:
 
俺公司一哥们以前混红十字会加拿大分舵, 当会计的,跳槽出来之后就坚决不再捐款了。:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
后退
顶部