Warning! Schemes Can Have Serious Tax Consequences!

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 Riven
  • 开始时间 开始时间

Riven

Administrator
管理成员
注册
2002-01-16
消息
28,418
荣誉分数
5,417
声望点数
393
OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(May 26, 2015) - The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is warning Canadians about tax schemes that claim you can benefit from the funds or property held in registered retirement investment vehicles without making a withdrawal and without paying any income tax.

Taxpayers who participate in these tax schemes could be avoiding or evading taxes, and this will result in serious consequences.

Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Benefiting with no withdrawals?

Rules in the Income Tax Act ("prohibitive advantage rules") prevent individuals from using the property or funds held inside their RRSP or RRIF to realize an advantage. While the law allows some notable, legal exceptions (such as using the funds to participate in the Home Buyers' Plan and the Lifelong Learning Plan), individuals must normally first withdraw the property from their RRSP or RRIF and pay the related income tax.

Example

Scheme 1

Through his RRSP, Daniel buys shares of a corporation that owns a condominium unit. The fair market rental rate is $1,000 per month, or $12,000 per year. In return for his RRSP buying the shares, Daniel gets to rent the condo at a reduced rate of $750 per month, or $9,000 per year.

Daniel has enjoyed the advantage of a preferential rental rate through the use of his RRSP funds. That will cost him -- he must pay tax equal to 100% of the fair market value of the benefit extended to him. That is, Daniel would have to pay $3,000 (the difference between the market rate and the actual rate) in taxes for every year that he rents the condo at this preferred rate.

Scheme 2

Through his RRSP, Daniel buys shares of a corporation that owns a condominium unit. The corporation sold the condo unit to Daniel at a reduced price of $250,000-less than the fair market value of $400,000.

Daniel has enjoyed the advantage of a reduced purchase price through the use of his RRSP funds. That means he is subject to a tax equal to 100% of the difference between the actual sale price and the fair market value of the unit. Daniel would therefore have to pay $150,000 in taxes.

The schemes only look legitimate

Promoters of these schemes are often polished and professional, and go to great lengths to make the schemes look legitimate. They may use Internet ads and websites, local newspaper ads, and hold promotional meetings or seminars in hotel banquet halls.

Promoters will often provide letters from purported professionals to give the impression that they endorse the scheme. Do not assume that these schemes and the promised tax benefits are legal under the Income Tax Act.

Get professional, independent advice

If you are thinking about investing in one of these arrangements, get independent legal and tax advice from a tax professional who is not connected to the scheme or the promoter.

Come to us before we come to you

Have you received questionable tax advice and are now wondering if it was legitimate? Did you willingly participate in a questionable tax scheme? If so, come forward and correct your tax affairs through the CRA's Voluntary Disclosures Program. Filing a valid voluntary disclosure before the CRA starts compliance action means you could pay only the taxes you owe plus interest, and you may avoid penalties and potential prosecution. More information on the Voluntary Disclosures Program is available at www.cra.gc.ca/voluntarydisclosures.

More information

For more information on the prohibited advantage rules in the Income Tax Act, go to Tax Payable on an Advantage.

For more information about other RRSP-related schemes, see the following Tax Alerts:

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/nwsrm/lrts/2009/l090317-eng.html

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/nwsrm/lrts/2007/071129-eng.html

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/nwsrm/lrts/2005/051110-eng.html

Stay connected

To receive updates when new information is added to our website, you can:

• Follow the CRA on Twitter - @CanRevAgency.

• Subscribe to a CRA electronic mailing list.

• Add our RSS feeds to your feed reader.

• Watch our tax-related videos on YouTube.
 
:shy:跟CRA抖机灵
 
英语不好,没看明白怎么玩的。

丹你熬在他RRSP帐户买了物业公司的股票(买多少,没说),然后租了同一物业公司拥有的康斗,每月优惠价750,市场价1000,然后税务局要他补 (1000-750)x12 一年100%的税,就是一年3000的税。为啥?他低价租房750又没有拿去抵税,为啥这么罚?这个故事里物业公司纯亏,该租1000只租750,就算租客买了它的股票,多少钱买的买多少,怎么能把每月250差价赚回来?

丹你熬在他RRSP帐户买了物业公司的股票(买多少,没说),然后这个物业公司以25万价格把一康斗卖给他,市场价40万,然后税务局要他补 40万-25万=15万 100%的税。为啥?他廉价买得一房,没有拿去抵税,为啥这么罚?这个故事里物业公司纯亏,该卖40万的只卖25万,就算买家买了它的股票,多少钱买的买多少,怎么能把15万差价赚回来?

有些环节没讲清楚,物业公司看起来像活雷锋,税务局像城管。
 
英语不好,没看明白怎么玩的。

丹你熬在他RRSP帐户买了物业公司的股票(买多少,没说),然后租了同一物业公司拥有的康斗,每月优惠价750,市场价1000,然后税务局要他补 (1000-750)x12 一年100%的税,就是一年3000的税。为啥?他低价租房750又没有拿去抵税,为啥这么罚?这个故事里物业公司纯亏,该租1000只租750,就算租客买了它的股票,多少钱买的买多少,怎么能把每月250差价赚回来?

丹你熬在他RRSP帐户买了物业公司的股票(买多少,没说),然后这个物业公司以25万价格把一康斗卖给他,市场价40万,然后税务局要他补 40万-25万=15万 100%的税。为啥?他廉价买得一房,没有拿去抵税,为啥这么罚?这个故事里物业公司纯亏,该卖40万的只卖25万,就算买家买了它的股票,多少钱买的买多少,怎么能把15万差价赚回来?

有些环节没讲清楚,物业公司看起来像活雷锋,税务局像城管。
感觉是那3k按Taxable benefit 来算。物业公司这么干完全可以把自己做成亏损。CRA两头都收不到税当然不干啦。
 
后退
顶部