年轻大学生看安省退休金计划:保障晚年财政

一个政府。这更是问题。强制储蓄。没问题。安省要是个人。就是最大的废材。欠债欠得儿子都还不起。这种人拼命和你说我帮你存钱。你把钱给我。

这个是问题的关键。自由党把安省纳税人的钱根本就没当回事、不断加税、加费、涨价、还不断增加赤字、实在是浪费无数。现在巧立名目又收一大笔,最终又是被他们挥霍浪费毫无益处。

现在安省反对党无力制衡、联邦保守党帮忙抵制一下实在是做了一件大好事。
 
最后编辑:
从文章后面的评论看,安省老百姓不是傻瓜

Taxrage2 days ago
When you're running a $12B deficit and have the largest sub-sovereign debt on the planet, it doesn't take a genius to understand that this is totally the wrong time to be launching a pension plan with requisite payroll taxes on employees and employers.

Harper - the economist - understands that. Wynne - the school board trustee - does not.
189 Reply
  • Illtempered Taxrage2 days agoShe understands completely. She does not care. She is desperate for funds and can't figure out another source of revenue. She is kiting debt, and looking in the sofa for change.
135 Reply
eddie Illtempered2 days ago
  • This. The more money Wynne can take from you now, under whatever pretenses, the better so she can give to her union friends that supperted them in the election.
 
今天主流媚体上有一篇文章说ORPP对高收入比如9万左右的人最有利,交的远少于CPP,不过将来的benifits甚至可能会超过CPP
CPP也是个大锅饭,每年交差不多5000千,67岁以后最多每月1065(今年标准)。
 
go backNewsCanada

ADVERTISEMENT



i

Ontario Retirement Pension Plan: Who loses, who wins

Small businesses may take a hit now, but middle class workers could welcome it down the road

11:20 AM ETErin Obourn, CBC News

Share this story

media duration:1:19play video

Stephen Harper attacks Ontario Pension PlanVIDEO

If you've heard anything about the proposed Ontario Retirement Pension Plan, it's probably that Conservative Leader Stephen Harper and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne are publicly fighting about it.

While there's no love lost between these two, there may be some love in the ORPP for Ontario's future pensioners – and less so for others.

Under the Ontario pension plan, which was approved in legislation in April, workers will have to contribute 1.9 per cent of their pay, to a maximum of $1,643 a year, which employers will have to match for every employee. Earnings above $90,000 will be exempt from ORPP contributions.

Ontario's pension plan: how would it work?Harper, Wynne trade barbs over pension planHarper has 'head in sand' on Ontario retirement planOntario slowing its Retirement Pension Plan

The mandatory contributions will be phased in over two years, starting with larger companies in 2017 before expanding to include medium-sized companies a year after that, while small operations like convenience stores and dry cleaners will be on a two-year delay.

Harper has slammed the idea as "an enormous tax increase," saying he is "delighted" that Ottawa's refusal to help administer the new pension plan will make it more difficult for Ontario to implement it.

Mandatory contributions to the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan will be phased in over several years, starting with larger companies in 2017 before expanding to include medium-sized and small companies in the two years after that. (Canadian Press)

Harper said it would be bad for the economy and bad for jobs, noting small businesses have warned they'll have to cut jobs to meet the extra costs of a new pension plan.

Wynne blamed Harper for adding to the "high anxiety" felt by voters in Ontario over retirement security.

As politicians battle it out in the run-up to the federal election, who are the real winners and losers of the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan?

The losers:

People who want to opt out

In the U.K., the National Employment Savings Trust gives workers the right to opt out of a workplace pension set up by the government.

"It gives employees an opt-out option, which means if you really don't want to do this, you don't have to," said Keith Ambachtsheer, director emeritus, Rotman International Centre for Pension Management, University of Toronto. "I like that feature and I wish that we would be doing that here."

One of the complaints about Wynne's proposal is that some people who aren't exempt from this forced saving program will be given no other option if they don't want to participate.

Salary:

$45,000

Salary:

$70,000

Salary:

$90,000

Contributions

Barbara contributes
$2.16 per day

Contributions

Bonnie contributes
$3.46 per day

Contributions

Bernice contributes
$4.50 per day

Employer Contributions

Barbara's employer contributes
$2.16 per day

Employer Contributions

Bonnie's employer contributes
$3.46 per day

Employer Contributions

Bernice's employer contributes
$4.50 per day

Retirement Benefits

Barbara gets
$6,410 / year
for life

Retirement Benefits

Bonnie gets
$9,970 / year
for life

Retirement Benefits

Bernice gets
$12,815 / year
for life

"There are other people who participate in their retirement savings in different ways who aren't being exempted and what we're going to see happen is people will have to cut back the contributions they make to existing retirement plans in order to come up with the money for this," said financial author Gail Vaz-Oxlade.

However, by making the program mandatory, the government can run a large-scale pension plan at the lowest overhead, said Lauchlan Munro, director of the University of Ottawa's School of International Development and Global Studies.

Workers making minimum wage

"The closer you are to the poverty line the harder it will be to afford," Munro said of the ORPP. "It is an issue."

The general minimum wage in Ontario is currently $11 an hour, set to rise to $11.25 in October.

"You can't make a living on minimum wage and save for retirement. You can't save if you're trying to put a roof over your head and food in your children's bellies," said Vaz-Oxlade. "So what [Wynne] should be focusing on is making sure everyone has a livable wage. A lot of people in Ontario right now don't have the resources to meet their needs."

Vaz-Oxlade suggests empowering people to plan for their future by teaching them to become financially literate and to make wise decisions about saving, rather than leaving it to the government.

Small businesses with tight profit margins

Amir Rahim, who owns Backdrop Food and Drink in Ottawa, is not sure his business can handle the implications of the ORPP.

"I'm working on some really tight margins. If my wage costs went up another 1.9 per cent, for example, I would be losing money right off the bat," he said.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business says most small businesses in Ontario are against the proposal.

"Our members are telling us they are looking at cutting the number of positions they have, or at least not hiring as much as they would have liked to," Corinne Pohlmann, CFIB's senior vice-president of national affairs, told CBC News Network.

She said the ORPP could discourage entrepreneurship.

"This will add to the decision making in Ottawa for a lot of small businesses about whether or not they want to open or even build a business here in Ottawa versus on the Quebec side or in another province."

However, Munro said, the ORPP is designed to help the middle class, not hurt businesses. "[Businesses] said the same thing about the CPP. This is modelled closely after the CPP. Any time someone comes along with such a proposal, some object."

The winners:

Businesses that plan early

Wynne's government has said it is slowing down the phase-in of the controversial ORPP to ease the transition for small and medium-sized businesses.

"It's a modest pension," said Ambachtsheer. "When you think of it from the employer point of view, 1.9 per cent of pay phased in over a three-year period, that's not a huge bite. I think it's an overblown issue."

Employers generally try to keep their workers' salaries up to date with inflation, he said.

"Maybe some of those inflation-related updates have to go towards the pension plan if the employer really can't do both."

"There will be a few businesses with small profit margins that might suffer, but the claim that this is a massive job killer, I don't think so," Munro said.

Middle class workers not saving because of inertia

People value today more than they value tomorrow. That is the behavioural research logic on which the ORPP is based, said Ambachtsheer and Munro.

"It's inertia. The argument the government would make is that this is a way of overcoming that inertia," Ambachtsheer said. "That you're helping people do what they should already be doing on their own."

Status quo

There are many people that the ORPP won't affect at all.

Retired Canadians and those approaching retirement age will not be affected, and more than one million workers in Ontario who are self-employed will also not be required to pay into the ORPP.

Employees who have workplace pension plans "comparable" to the ORPP will not be eligible. Many of those are public sector employees with defined benefit plans, which pay a benefit for life at retirement.

With files from CBC's Adrian Harewood and The Canadian Press

Share this story

Related Links

Ontario's Retirement Pension Plan: how would it work?Stephen Harper 'delighted' to slow down Kathleen Wynne's pension planGreg Selinger 'not going to lose sleep' over Harper's barbs with premiersStephen Harper, Kathleen Wynne trade barbs over pensionsFeds move not to help Ontario create pension plan 'purely political': WynneStephen Harper has 'head in the sand' about Ontarian's retirement savingsGraham Steele: Provincial politics entangled in federal campaignCanada election 2015: Do premiers help or hinder their federal partners?Canada election 2015: Why Stephen Harper is battling it out with Wynne and Notley

Mobile ServicesContact UsHelpTerms of UsePrivacy

Copyright © CBC 2015
 
公务员豁免。小生意受罪?
 
公务员豁免。小生意受罪?
公仆可以拿upto 70%的工资,这个浑水自然不趟了。
说实话,每月100多不算啥,还有公司match。
只是对政客们完全没信心,等退休时估计会让70岁才让领。比谁活得长就赚。
 
公仆可以拿upto 70%的工资,这个浑水自然不趟了。
说实话,每月100多不算啥,还有公司match。
只是对政客们完全没信心,等退休时估计会让70岁才让领。比谁活得长就赚。
蓝领哥,难得糊涂吧,算小账没有意义,要对政府有信心。我说的是无论哪个政党。
这地方吧,就是高福利慢发展,税到了这地步,其实也已经没啥上升空间了,不见得真的搞乌托邦社会主义吧。
至于养老,我邻居townhouse owner,70多,2位都算健康,昨天聊天,他们是把大房子卖了然后全款买了30多万的townhouse,自己还有一部美国车chevy,养老的组成就是三部分,cpp,老年金,再加自己老公司的退休金,一个月2000多一个人吧,2人有个4-5000千,还行,够活下去。老人身体好的不得了,自己搭建shed。身体好比钞票多重要的多。
至于想要过的舒服,现在安省养老院,条件还行的地方,一般4000一位包食宿,安省大概只有5percent的老人能够afford。
 
高福利就是社会毒瘤,一元税金0.38投入health care,所以啥公务员不公务员的,都是政客搞煽动的借口。敢动health care的政党,一个也没有。
再给你搞点难民,再补贴一把单亲妈妈,齐活,钞票就是这么浪费的。
 
高福利就是社会毒瘤,一元税金0.38投入health care,所以啥公务员不公务员的,都是政客搞煽动的借口。敢动health care的政党,一个也没有。
再给你搞点难民,再补贴一把单亲妈妈,齐活,钞票就是这么浪费的。
去查查这个大锅饭 health care 当年是那个党为了骗选票引入的?自由党在这方面可以说是食髓知味了。
 
看看现在美国象驴两党围绕Obamacare展开的争论,可以发现这是西方国家的普遍现象:右派以发展经济为号召,左派以派发福利大锅饭骗选票。
 
蓝领哥,难得糊涂吧,算小账没有意义,要对政府有信心。我说的是无论哪个政党。
这地方吧,就是高福利慢发展,税到了这地步,其实也已经没啥上升空间了,不见得真的搞乌托邦社会主义吧。
至于养老,我邻居townhouse owner,70多,2位都算健康,昨天聊天,他们是把大房子卖了然后全款买了30多万的townhouse,自己还有一部美国车chevy,养老的组成就是三部分,cpp,老年金,再加自己老公司的退休金,一个月2000多一个人吧,2人有个4-5000千,还行,够活下去。老人身体好的不得了,自己搭建shed。身体好比钞票多重要的多。
至于想要过的舒服,现在安省养老院,条件还行的地方,一般4000一位包食宿,安省大概只有5percent的老人能够afford。
早麻木了
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的