Nanos tracking: 自由党以35.6%领先

[Sundown]

他们就是忘恩负义啊。 当年2008/2009年北电倒闭后联邦政府在渥村地区吸收了好几千人，那是保守党实实在在的贡献。一转眼，骂保守党，这不是过河拆桥么。

保守党下台！

 

[Sundown]

Nepean 的NDP支持者多吗?

支持自由党多。

 

[jasonott]

保守党增加公务员时忘了？那会儿有人说好了吗？
现在稍微减少几个职位(减少的大多是已退休的职位)就骂他千遍万遍？都是些什么人啊！


没准这些骂保守党的公务员的职位就是保守党当时增加的。现在他反拿这个说事。

该骂的就是他这种瞎折腾 开始扩招了好多然后又都裁掉 现在跟他刚上台时公务员人数基本差不多 但是你知道这浪费了多少钱呀 政府招一个雇员费很多钱的 这钱都是大家缴的税 还有这些人这几年的工资 绝不是小数目！

 

[GuardianAngel]

该骂的就是他这种瞎折腾 开始扩招了好多然后又都裁掉 现在跟他刚上台时公务员人数基本差不多 但是你知道这浪费了多少钱呀 政府招一个雇员费很多钱的 这钱都是大家缴的税 还有这些人这几年的工资 绝不是小数目！

以前扩招,现在减掉少量当然是有原因的。这个不是我们目前讨论的subject.你自己看看骂保守党的人骂的是什么:

疯了？ 蓝的可是砍公务员的凶手， 双方仇深似海啊！

 

[jasonott]

以前扩招,现在减掉少量当然是有原因的。这个不是我们目前讨论的subject.你自己看看骂保守党的人骂的是什么:

剪掉的绝不是少量而且是不应该剪的 比如scientists

 

[GuardianAngel]

剪掉的绝不是少量而且是不应该剪的 比如scientists

有数据表明是增加的多,还是减的多?我的印象是减的少。
关于加拿大这人口区区3千多万的国家的政府机构该养多少"scientists"和这些"scientists"有无对加拿大的经济和发展做什么贡献我不想评价。加拿大大学里的票professors算scientists吧？有减少吗？

 

[YINGWA]

NDP丢的席位都跑到LIB手里去了。

等着看QC那些席位吧。

In 2003 election, Paul Martin (Mr Dither) used scared tactics drove NPD voters to Liberal and was elected (minority).
That didn't work in 2005 election and he lost (Jean Chretien said during 2006 Liberal convention to replace Paul as leader, when asked by media, Jean said I won three elections and he LOST).

 

[YINGWA]

L

疯了？ 蓝的可是砍公务员的凶手， 双方仇深似海啊！

Liberal did the same (砍公务员) back in 1993 (to balance the budget)

 

[urus]

L

Liberal did the same (砍公务员) back in 1993 (to balance the budget)

那些伤疤已经好了。 Move on了。
哈勃的伤口， 还血淋淋的在眼前呢。

 

[WHW]

哪个党上台砍公务员，都对！
养了帮吃皇粮，不好好干活的。

 

[YINGWA]

哪个党上台砍公务员，都对！
养了帮吃皇粮，不好好干活的。

Ethnic CHINESE are hardworking !
(In Government and Private Sectors...)
I learnt from Government friends, (AGENCY)Senior Managers decided who to "砍", and those being "砍", to senior managers were BAD blood. If people (media?) think Government employees are lazy, then, what's wrong to "砍" lazy employees? If you are the employer (which all tax payers ARE), will you "砍" lazy employees?

 

[WHW]

Ethnic CHINESE are hardworking !
(In Government and Private Sectors...)
I learnt from Government friends, (AGENCY)Senior Managers decided who to "砍", and those being "砍", to senior managers were BAD blood. If people (media?) think Government employees are lazy, then, what's wrong to "砍" lazy employees? If you are the employer (which all tax payers ARE), will you "砍" lazy employees?

Not everyone, not every chinese.
Does this statement satisfy you?
环境可以改变一个人。