我的同胞啊,想当大哥大就不要在加拿大掺和政治好不好?

Why is ex-Liberal MP Raymond Chan running away from a reporter?
Will party bagman have a role if Trudeau becomes PM?
bobmackin 10/18/2015 #elxn42


Trudeau’s last pre-election rally (Mackin)
Liberal leader Justin Trudeau ended his campaign with a raspy voice, amid an overflow crowd at the Pipe Shop at the Shipyards in North Vancouver on Oct. 18. Introduced by restaurateur Vikram Vij, Trudeau relied on his speaking notes, even for recounting childhood memories in North Vancouver. He passionately urged his supporters to get out the vote on election day, to defeat Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

As I was leaving, I spotted ex-Richmond Liberal MP Raymond Chan outside the building. Chan has been the subject of many stories in recent months locally, nationally and internationally about his Liberal Party fundraising activities and his links to Michael Mo Yeung Ching, a Richmond, B.C. developer wanted by the Chinese government. My story for the Vancouver Courier was first to confirm that Ching is also known as Cheng Muyang.


Chan after Trudeau rally (Mackin)
South China Morning Post correspondent Ian James Young’s Oct. 1 story, under the headline “Group based in Chinese graft suspect Michael Ching’s office helped stage big Toronto gala for PM contender Trudeau” included photographs of Trudeau, Ching and Chan at a fundraiser in Toronto. Young’s Sept. 30 story included a photograph of Trudeau, flanked by Ching to his left and Chan to his right, at a June 2, 2013 Liberal fundraiser.

The Conservatives complained to Elections Canada at the start of October. NDP director of operations Dave Hare’s Aug. 21 letter to Elections Canada said: “The allegations that have been raised in connection to this ongoing controversy are potential violations of the Elections Canada Act and of serious concern.”

I reminded Chan that I had been trying to get his side of the story since April, but all he told me today was: “What I don’t like is people feeding on rumours, and then we don’t respond to rumours. It’s so unfair.”

I began to ask about his Liberal fundraising activities. Chan turned around to walk away. I turned on my video app and tried following him on the public walkway, to the parking lot, while loudly asking more questions. Several people, who later claimed to be Liberal volunteers, physically blocked both my lens and my passage. Mobile users, click here to see the video.

If Trudeau and the Liberals win the election and form the government after Oct. 19, will Chan have a role behind-the-scenes?
 
说明狗仔没有沉捉鱼跑得快。:evil:
正经的人都不讲鸭语。。。我自干五帮你翻译一下: 自由党MP, 陈卓喻。
 
Why is ex-Liberal MP Raymond Chan running away from a reporter?
Will party bagman have a role if Trudeau becomes PM?
bobmackin 10/18/2015 #elxn42


Trudeau’s last pre-election rally (Mackin)
Liberal leader Justin Trudeau ended his campaign with a raspy voice, amid an overflow crowd at the Pipe Shop at the Shipyards in North Vancouver on Oct. 18. Introduced by restaurateur Vikram Vij, Trudeau relied on his speaking notes, even for recounting childhood memories in North Vancouver. He passionately urged his supporters to get out the vote on election day, to defeat Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

As I was leaving, I spotted ex-Richmond Liberal MP Raymond Chan outside the building. Chan has been the subject of many stories in recent months locally, nationally and internationally about his Liberal Party fundraising activities and his links to Michael Mo Yeung Ching, a Richmond, B.C. developer wanted by the Chinese government. My story for the Vancouver Courier was first to confirm that Ching is also known as Cheng Muyang.


Chan after Trudeau rally (Mackin)
South China Morning Post correspondent Ian James Young’s Oct. 1 story, under the headline “Group based in Chinese graft suspect Michael Ching’s office helped stage big Toronto gala for PM contender Trudeau” included photographs of Trudeau, Ching and Chan at a fundraiser in Toronto. Young’s Sept. 30 story included a photograph of Trudeau, flanked by Ching to his left and Chan to his right, at a June 2, 2013 Liberal fundraiser.

The Conservatives complained to Elections Canada at the start of October. NDP director of operations Dave Hare’s Aug. 21 letter to Elections Canada said: “The allegations that have been raised in connection to this ongoing controversy are potential violations of the Elections Canada Act and of serious concern.”

I reminded Chan that I had been trying to get his side of the story since April, but all he told me today was: “What I don’t like is people feeding on rumours, and then we don’t respond to rumours. It’s so unfair.”

I began to ask about his Liberal fundraising activities. Chan turned around to walk away. I turned on my video app and tried following him on the public walkway, to the parking lot, while loudly asking more questions. Several people, who later claimed to be Liberal volunteers, physically blocked both my lens and my passage. Mobile users, click here to see the video.

If Trudeau and the Liberals win the election and form the government after Oct. 19, will Chan have a role behind-the-scenes?


这个清晰明了多了,只贴录像根本不明白怎么回事。
 
没有听到任何理性的对话,只有看到躲避和暴力推拉。

常常听到狗仔队的说法,印象中是打听名人隐私的记者。在竞选过程中在公共场合询问竞选负责人有关政治活动的记者是狗仔?这好像是第一次听说。

如果记者的采访权不能被保障,如果保障民众的知情权?

记者采访权? 这个是个什么权利? 能详细跟我说说么,我很感兴趣
 
这个清晰明了多了,只贴录像根本不明白怎么回事。

读了那文章,还是弄不清楚为什么那记者没有权利在公共场所询问陈前议员有关他政治募捐活动的问题。也无法明白为什么那记者被打为“狗仔”。能不能指点一二?
 
最后编辑:
记者采访权? 这个是个什么权利? 能详细跟我说说么,我很感兴趣

你是说,记者(或者我们放宽一点,公民)没有权利在公共场所询问政治人物有关其政治活动的权利?这个我还真不知道。很希望能够了解。

据我的印象(我不是学法律的),在加拿大法不禁止就是可以做的。请给出禁止该记者所做的 事情(即在公开场合追问政治人物的政治活动)的相关法律条文。
 
跑个鬼啊,不明白。

harper_gives_the_finger1.jpg
 
自由党前议员现选举组织者兼募款人Raymond 陈和他的保镖(?)。
噢哦, 好像是前不久被加拿大情报部门盯上的那个亲中人士。
 
这里有一篇学术讨论文章

The right of public to know
Practicing journalism which prioritizes individual’s right to privacy is widely recommended in journalism, but there are times which the public’s right to know should be the journalist’s mainconcern. In my opinion, publics have the right to be aware of the things that concerns their safety or things that might affect their way of living. To best exemplify this point is the articlewritten by Elliot Jaspen and Maria Miro Johnson which reported the criminal histories of RhodeIsland’s school bus drivers (Meyer 2002, p. 232). When the ex-convicts are working as schoolbus drivers and are consistently interacting with children of the neighborhood, publics have theright to know because it is concerning the safety of their children.

Another example will be taken from the political perspective of public’s right to know. During thepresidential election of 1992, Bill Clinton was facing media allegations regarding “sexualexploits” when he was the governor of Arkansas (BBC News, 1998). In order to have a fair dealing election, public have the right to know about the morality of the person that will becomethe future president of their country. Whether or not this information effect the outcome of theelection is for the public to decide. A politician’s secret love story being exposed in the media isnot a form of privacy invasion because “scandalous behaviors of this nature cannot legitimatelyclaim the protection of privacy” (Belsey & Chadwick 2006, p.58). This stir in the media causedthe public to doubt his honesty and morality, but Clinton proved to have many supportersregardless of this incident, which eventually lead to his presidency (Smith, 2008)

http://www.academia.edu/3632045/Jou..._Right_to_Know_versus_Infringement_of_Privacy
 
后退
顶部