你来,你来,你来,看看这个案例是谁的责任:大众强行变道,遭比亚迪加速顶翻 (内含视频)

http://www.wheels.ca/news/is-it-illegal-to-block-someone-from-merging-with-traffic/
Is it illegal to block someone from merging with traffic?

A motorist is frustrated with drivers deliberately speeding up to eliminate gaps when he is trying to merge with highway traffic. Is this act illegal?

- See more at: http://www.wheels.ca/news/is-it-ill...om-merging-with-traffic/#sthash.Jlk5TZpH.dpuf
Q:
I find many drivers will deliberately block vehicles from merging into traffic on highways and roads. For example, by speeding up to eliminate gaps once you signal your intention to merge.

Is this inconsiderate action legal?

A: Ontario Transportation Ministry spokesperson Bob Nichols replies:

The right-of-way when a lane ends or when traffic enters a freeway is not explicitly addressed in the Highway Traffic Act (HTA), but the rules for changing lanes apply. Based on the existing rules-of-the-road, there are responsibilities placed on both drivers entering a freeway (or in a lane that is ending) and the drivers in the adjacent through-lane.

Traffic on the freeway should be aware of and help traffic entering the freeway by changing lanes, when it is safe to do so, or by adjusting their speed to make useable gaps. If a vehicle is merging into your lane, be courteous and make every effort to avoid a collision.

Drivers entering the freeway should match their speed to that of traffic, then signal and merge safely well before they reach the end of the lane. Under section 142 of the HTA, before making a lane change, the merging driver ?shall first see that the movement can be made in safety.?

From reading section 62(1) HTA, it seems that amber bulbs are allowed for car headlights. Is this correct?

Ontario Transportation Ministry spokesperson Bob Nichols replies:

Regulation of vehicle lighting is shared between the federal and provincial governments. On new vehicles, the federal government requires two white headlights, and two amber or white parking lights, one on each corner of the front of the vehicle. Also, parking lights are required to remain on when the headlights are activated, which enhances road safety should a headlight burn out.

The provincial government regulates lighting for vehicles operating on Ontario?s roads. Section 62(1) of the Highway Traffic Act (HTA) permits the use of either white or amber front lights and one rear red light on motor vehicles subject to specified performance requirements also outlined in s.62 of the HTA.

It should be noted however that a vehicle with only amber front lights can be a safety concern, as other road users may be confused by the unusual headlight colours. Therefore, the likely intent of s.62(1) is to recognize situations such as when a motorist experiences a burnt-out headlight and needs to safely drive to a location to change the bulb.

Information above is of a general nature only. For legal advice or opinion, consult a lawyer or paralegal qualified in this area of law.

- See more at: http://www.wheels.ca/news/is-it-ill...om-merging-with-traffic/#sthash.Jlk5TZpH.dpuf

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=629511
Illinois law on merges is as follows:
Quote:
Sec. 11‑905. Merging traffic. Not withstanding the right of way provision in Sec. 11‑901 of this Act, at an intersection where traffic lanes are provided for merging traffic the driver of each vehicle on the converging roadways is required to adjust his vehicular speed and lateral position so as to avoid a collision with another vehicle.

你这两个都是关于merging的。

这里的故事不是。
 
神粥大地教大众车强行并道了吗?:o
靠,又来了,都这会了,还要您老来指教大众司机是傻逼吗?
BYD司机不仅是傻逼,还是个混蛋
对方已经多次要强行并线了,很可能大众司机就是个神经病,也可能是酒驾,也可能是罪犯,如果BYD司机没注意到就罢了
明明知道,还加速变速不让并线,不仅置大众司机于危险(傻逼自找的就算了),不仅置BYD司机自己于危险,而且置其他人于危险之中,几条道全部是繁忙的车辆,车撞起来什么结果,天知道。
 
http://www.michigan.gov/msp/0,4643,7-123-1586_27094-73839--,00.html
Question: When merging onto a freeway who has the right-of-way?

Answer: MCL 257.649(7) governs this question. A driver entering a roadway from a roadway that is intended for and constructed as a merging roadway, and is plainly marked at the intersection with the appropriate merge signs, shall yield the right-of-way to traffic upon the roadway that is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard and shall adjust their speed to enable them to merge safely with through traffic. Simply put, a driver merging onto a freeway must yield to traffic upon the freeway. It must be noted that traffic on the freeway cannot intentionally block a driver from merging by either speeding up or slowing down.
春长嗦的对,那是实白线,就是墙。
 
靠,又来了,都这会了,还要您老来指教大众司机是傻逼吗?
BYD司机不仅是傻逼,还是个混蛋
对方已经多次要强行并线了,很可能大众司机就是个神经病,也可能是酒驾,也可能是罪犯,如果BYD司机没注意到就罢了
明明知道,还加速变速不让并线,不仅置大众司机于危险(傻逼自找的就算了),不仅置BYD司机自己于危险,而且置其他人于危险之中,几条道全部是繁忙的车辆,车撞起来什么结果,天知道。
习大大,人民群众是这么想的:大众车主是煞笔吧?这种煞笔要是政府不管或者管不过来的话,我们不介意另一个煞笔+混蛋出来管一管,这就是黑社会老炮们存在的价值。。。:D 当然,我们上有老下有小的是管不了。:monster:
 
靠,又来了,都这会了,还要您老来指教大众司机是傻逼吗?
BYD司机不仅是傻逼,还是个混蛋
对方已经多次要强行并线了,很可能大众司机就是个神经病,也可能是酒驾,也可能是罪犯,如果BYD司机没注意到就罢了
明明知道,还加速变速不让并线,不仅置大众司机于危险(傻逼自找的就算了),不仅置BYD司机自己于危险,而且置其他人于危险之中,几条道全部是繁忙的车辆,车撞起来什么结果,天知道。
BYD的失误在于加速不够,让那个傻笔领先半个车身强行切入!如果BYD加速得当,一路并行,那个傻笔并个屁线!
 
正确,但是执法权在警察。人人都可执法,叫私刑,在马路上就是危害公共安全,谁知道会撞翻多少辆无辜车辆

他不是从下面上来到高速,没有merge lane ends的问题。那车就应该follow the traffic。
 
交规要求:
"Safe and Responsible Driving
You must be able to see dangerous situations before they happen and to respond quickly and effectively to prevent them. This is called defensive or strategic driving."
你知道危险而没有采取行动避免,你就有责任,虽然只是小部分责任
而如果是来不及避开才没责任。
尼玛, 这事儿越来越复杂了。
咋还整上英文了呢? 凭啥? 我就问一句, 凭啥?
中国人在中国发生的交通事故, 凭啥要用英文来解释?
还 “交规要求:Safe and Responsible Driving” ? 你这中西合璧的, 搁哪都不认可的个玩意儿。
 
http://www.edmunds.com/driving-tips/car-merging-psychology-dont-hate-the-sidezoomer.html
When early mergers see the late mergers zip by, "most drivers feel irritated, some angry and roadrageous," he says. Trying to block them is "dangerous, illegal and begging for a confrontation."

别钻牛角尖啦。这里的情况不是merge的问题。

你查查白实线有什么说法。

IMG_3979.jpg
 
最后编辑:
靠,又来了,都这会了,还要您老来指教大众司机是傻逼吗?
BYD司机不仅是傻逼,还是个混蛋
对方已经多次要强行并线了,很可能大众司机就是个神经病,也可能是酒驾,也可能是罪犯,如果BYD司机没注意到就罢了
明明知道,还加速变速不让并线,不仅置大众司机于危险(傻逼自找的就算了),不仅置BYD司机自己于危险,而且置其他人于危险之中,几条道全部是繁忙的车辆,车撞起来什么结果,天知道。
你咋就知道你后面的不是另一个傻逼在你丝露荡的时候追你的尾巴呢?:rolleyes:
 
尼玛, 这事儿越来越复杂了。
咋还整上英文了呢? 凭啥? 我就问一句, 凭啥?
中国人在中国发生的交通事故, 凭啥要用英文来解释?
还 “交规要求:Safe and Responsible Driving” ? 你这中西合璧的, 搁哪都不认可的个玩意儿。
擦,CFC就从来没有同仇敌忾过,一直都是一个事件各自表述:D,尼玛这回老向还没出来呢就是一片混战。:monster:
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的