原CBC主持Ghomeshi被判无罪

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 zhzh
  • 开始时间 开始时间

zhzh

九袋长老
注册
2003-10-17
消息
1,644
荣誉分数
280
声望点数
243
11806435.jpg


An Ontario Court judge has acquitted former CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi on four counts of sexual assault and one count of choking, saying there were significant issues raised about the credibility of complainants.

Judge William Horkins said the evidence from all three women not only suffered from inconsistencies, but was "tainted by outright deception."

After Horkins delivered his ruling, Ghomeshi, 48, hugged his mother, sister and other supporters who sat behind him in the courtroom.

The trial, which began in Toronto on Feb. 1, 2016, lasted eight days. Ghomeshi had pleaded not guilty to all the charges, all related to assaults alleged to have taken place from 2002 to 2003.

The identities of two of the complainants in the case are protected under a publication ban, but actress Lucy DeCoutere, also an air force captain, went to court to lift the ban on her name.

The first woman to testify told court that Ghomeshi had pulled her hair and punched her in the head at his home after a dinner date. DeCoutere said the former Q host had choked and slapped her at his home. The third woman said Ghomeshi had squeezed her neck and covered her mouth while they were kissing on a park bench.

But it was later revealed in court that each woman had had contact with Ghomeshi following the alleged assaults and that details of this contact had not been provided to police or the Crown in their initial statements.

The first witness had told police and the court she had no subsequent contact with Ghomeshi after two alleged attacks but later acknowledged she sent him two emails and a picture of herself in a bikini more than a year later. The woman said she sent the emails to bait Ghomeshi into calling her to explain his actions.

DeCoutere had told the court that she had no romantic interest in Ghomeshi after her alleged assault and only saw him at industry functions. But it was later revealed in court that hours after the alleged sexual assault, she had sent him an email saying she wanted to have sex with him and sent him a handwritten letter days later saying she was sad they didn't spend the night together.

The third woman, who told police she would only feel safe being out with Ghomeshi in public after her alleged assault, failed to disclose that days later, she had a consensual sexual encounter with him.

In his final argument, Crown attorney Michael Callaghan argued that the witnesses had provided explanations for some of of the inconsistencies, delayed disclosures or omissions in their evidence. He stressed that not withstanding vigorous cross-examination, all three "were unshaken" in their allegations that they were sexually assaulted by Ghomeshi.

But Ghomeshi's lawyer seized on those omissions, saying there testimony was "so riddled with inconsistencies and improbabilities and proven lies under oath that it cannot be said to prove anything."
 
最后编辑:
据说是约会接吻喜欢掐人脖子的主儿
 
我早就说了:一面之词不可信。
 
我早就说了:一面之词不可信。
回头再起诉CBC赔个500万精神、误工损失。。。土豆政府埋单。
爽啊。
 
回头再起诉CBC赔个500万精神、误工损失。。。土豆政府埋单。
爽啊。


不过呢,这小子肯定也是做了得罪人的事,比如快递服务,在已经减价的基础上收费不能再砍低,所以有三个女人同时诬告他。

老毛说了:没有无缘无故的恨。
 
丫割麦氏肯定是有性虐待倾向, 我相信那些女人的指控.
不过女同学们好象也挺享受的, 事后还继续跟他亲热. 事隔多年再上法庭告人家, 这哥就不理解了.

女人啊, 太复杂 ...
 
丫割麦氏肯定是有性虐待倾向, 我相信那些女人的指控.
不过女同学们好象也挺享受的, 事后还继续跟他亲热. 事隔多年再上法庭告人家, 这哥就不理解了.

女人啊, 太复杂 ...

看过色戒吗?未删节版的。
第一次,就是性虐,汤唯很享受。
:D
 
浏览附件585610

An Ontario Court judge has acquitted former CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi on four counts of sexual assault and one count of choking, saying there were significant issues raised about the credibility of complainants.

Judge William Horkins said the evidence from all three women not only suffered from inconsistencies, but was "tainted by outright deception."

After Horkins delivered his ruling, Ghomeshi, 48, hugged his mother, sister and other supporters who sat behind him in the courtroom.

The trial, which began in Toronto on Feb. 1, 2016, lasted eight days. Ghomeshi had pleaded not guilty to all the charges, all related to assaults alleged to have taken place from 2002 to 2003.

The identities of two of the complainants in the case are protected under a publication ban, but actress Lucy DeCoutere, also an air force captain, went to court to lift the ban on her name.

The first woman to testify told court that Ghomeshi had pulled her hair and punched her in the head at his home after a dinner date. DeCoutere said the former Q host had choked and slapped her at his home. The third woman said Ghomeshi had squeezed her neck and covered her mouth while they were kissing on a park bench.

But it was later revealed in court that each woman had had contact with Ghomeshi following the alleged assaults and that details of this contact had not been provided to police or the Crown in their initial statements.

The first witness had told police and the court she had no subsequent contact with Ghomeshi after two alleged attacks but later acknowledged she sent him two emails and a picture of herself in a bikini more than a year later. The woman said she sent the emails to bait Ghomeshi into calling her to explain his actions.

DeCoutere had told the court that she had no romantic interest in Ghomeshi after her alleged assault and only saw him at industry functions. But it was later revealed in court that hours after the alleged sexual assault, she had sent him an email saying she wanted to have sex with him and sent him a handwritten letter days later saying she was sad they didn't spend the night together.

The third woman, who told police she would only feel safe being out with Ghomeshi in public after her alleged assault, failed to disclose that days later, she had a consensual sexual encounter with him.

In his final argument, Crown attorney Michael Callaghan argued that the witnesses had provided explanations for some of of the inconsistencies, delayed disclosures or omissions in their evidence. He stressed that not withstanding vigorous cross-examination, all three "were unshaken" in their allegations that they were sexually assaulted by Ghomeshi.

But Ghomeshi's lawyer seized on those omissions, saying there testimony was "so riddled with inconsistencies and improbabilities and proven lies under oath that it cannot be said to prove anything."


这三个女原告在法庭说谎要不要追究她们的伪证罪?
 
这三个女原告在法庭说谎要不要追究她们的伪证罪?

我觉得不能叫说谎吧?只是有信息相抵,不能证实她们说的事实,所以沈无罪;同时也无法证明她们说谎,自然也无法追究。
除非沈先生找到证据证明她们说谎。
 
再继续下去,早晚JJ被人家G了
 
我觉得不能叫说谎吧?只是有信息相抵,不能证实她们说的事实,所以沈无罪;同时也无法证明她们说谎,自然也无法追究。
除非沈先生找到证据证明她们说谎。


好好读读楼主引的原文报道。
她们说谎了。
 
后退
顶部