加拿大房东穿鞋进穆斯林房间 歧视罪成罚1.2万

peterz365

资深人士
注册
2011-09-20
消息
4,819
荣誉分数
900
声望点数
273
加拿大房东穿鞋进穆斯林房间 歧视罪成罚1.2万
 42 评论加国无忧 51.CA2017年5月2日 20:49来源:本网综合作者:牧涛


由于进入穆斯林房客的房间时没有脱鞋,大多伦多地区宾顿(Brampton)一名房东被安省人权仲裁庭(The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario)裁定“歧视”成立,罚款1.2万元。

6_21505N12.jpg


据本地英文媒体《多伦多太阳报》报道,在2014年12月,埃及移民马德库尔夫妇(Walid Madkour and Heba Ismail)从蒙特利尔迁居宾顿市,租住在一幢民宅的一层(ground-floor)公寓间里。

马德库尔夫妇同房东阿拉比(John Alabi)相处地不是很愉快,双方发生了几次争执,并决定在2015年的2月28日中止租约。

其后,阿拉比不断带人来看房,而且按照当地的出租条例,提前24小时通知马德库尔夫妇。

当时马德库尔太太正好失业在家,不喜欢房东忽然带人闯进来,于是就要求他不仅提前24小时通知,而且在上门前一个小时也来通告一声,让她“有所准备”。

阿拉比不同意,表示出租条例没有这么规定,于是双方又吵了一架,而且报了警。

警员对马德库尔夫妇解释,安省的出租条例确实只规定了房东进入房客房间前,只需要提前24小时通知即可,所以阿拉比并没有做错。为了息事宁人,阿拉比也当着警员的面,答应了下次上门前5分钟通告房客夫妇一声,“好让他们至少有时间换衣服”。

然而,下次阿拉比再带人来看房的时候,并没有遵守上次的承诺,而且穿着鞋子进入了卧室内的祈祷室。马德库尔让阿拉比脱鞋,但是遭到拒绝,于是就用手机录下了视频,并告上了人权仲裁庭。

在庭上,房东阿拉比表示,他出租房子已经有15年的经验,也曾经租过了不同的种族,“穿鞋进房间从来就不是个争议”。他尊重马德库尔夫妇的信仰,但是这并不是他们给别人制造不方便的借口。

人权法官聆听了双方的证词,又看了证据,裁定房东阿拉比“歧视”成立。

法官表示,对于租客夫妇的宗教信仰来说,祈祷空间是相当神圣的,进出时必须保持祈祷室不受任何污染。房东在租客夫妇要求之下,却坚持不脱下鞋子,其做法相当不妥。

按判决,阿拉比要在30天执行判决并赔1.2万给租房夫妇。

租客马德库尔夫妇则表示对于法庭的判决感到开心,目前他们只想忘记这个事件并搬到其他的城市,也希望将来不再有人受到这样的歧视。
 
活该,反对M103时不努力,现在自食其果。
 
以后房东知道怎么做了
 
房东的名字好像也是绿的
 
房东的智商堪忧,不配做房东。
首先,既然出租给和平教大爷了,就要有侍候大爷的心理准备,不能半道撂挑子。
其次,大爷不乐意,准备要走了,还不做足工作解决问题,恭送大爷离开。非要好死不死的找茬,提前一小时打个电话很难吗?脱下鞋进房去会死人吗?
这SB房东以为加拿大是万恶的资本主义国家,房东可以欺男霸女,省政府难道是你家开的?
省政府明明是和平教开的好不好。
 
租客马德库尔夫妇则表示对于法庭的判决感到开心
 
想起公司有一个绿教哥们,跳槽去温哥华的微软了;薪水直接翻番,但是这个哥们平时就是一身白袍子,一把大胡子的绿教打扮;结果去了以后没人愿意租给他房子,烦的要死。
 
谁要不脱鞋在哥家踩, 哥也会把他告了 ...
 
进自己家房间也穿着鞋么?
 
就事论事,不涉及种族。尊重对方是彼此的...........
 
http://www.torontosun.com/2017/04/2...rampton-landlord-must-pay-muslim-couple-12000

Human Rights Tribunal rules Brampton landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000

1297122293484_AUTHOR_PHOTO.jpg

BY MICHELE MANDEL, TORONTO SUN

FIRST POSTED: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2017 08:43 PM EDT | UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2017 08:57 PM EDT

1297949121478_ORIGINAL.jpg

A landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to an Arab Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.
http://www.torontosun.com/2017/04/2...-12000?token=1a349f2013bd4a052027ac41a9ec454f
pin_it_button.png

Change text size for the story
Report an error

Related Stories
It didn’t help his case that he shared a joke about a devout Muslim on his Facebook page.

Now the small landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to an Arab Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario also found that he “harassed them and created a poisoned housing environment.”

His sins? John Alabi refused to remove his shoes when showing the bedroom where the couple prayed and while he always gave them the mandated 24-hour notice before showings, he didn’t always provide the five-minute heads-up they’d requested to ensure the wife was modestly dressed and they weren’t in the midst of their five daily prayers.

“There was absolutely no evidence that the applicants’ requests for additional notice and for the removal of shoes in this case were an attempt by them to impose their way of life on the respondent or anyone else,” ruled vice chair Jo-Anne Pickel. “(They) were merely making simple requests for the accommodation of their religious practices ... their requests easily could have been met without any hardship to the respondent, let alone any undue hardship as that term is used in human rights law.”

In December 2014, Walid Madkour and his wife Heba Ismail moved from Montreal into Alabi’s ground-floor apartment. Following several disputes, including the couple allegedly wanting their landlord to be quiet after 10 p.m., they agreed to terminate the lease on Feb. 28, 2015.

In the meantime, Alabi tried to rent out the unit. Madkhour wanted a one-hour notification of any showing in addition to the 24-hour notice.

Alabi told him that by law, only 24 hours was necessary. Madkhour accused him of “racism and violation of our civil rights:” Since his landlord was well aware that Ismail was unemployed and always home, “he considered it harassment for (Alabi) to continue to say that he would enter the premises without permission.”

Alabi texted back: “Welcome to Ontario, Canada.”

The landlord told the hearing that he meant that apartment viewing rules were different in Ontario than in Quebec where the couple had last lived. The human rights tribunal saw it as another example of discrimination.

That same evening, Ismail heard loud pounding on the steps outside their door; Alabi said he was just shovelling the snow; she said it was intimidating and frightening.

The couple called police.

They were told that contrary to their understanding, their landlord had a right to show the apartment when they were home. As a “courtesy,” Alabi agreed to give them five minutes notice in addition to the 24 hours. But that negotiated detente ended two days later after Ismail videotaped Alabi refusing to remove his shoes when entering their bedroom. “She said it was disrespectful and an act of racism.”

Alabi told the hearing that his shoes had never been an issue before and accused his tenants of trying to set up roadblocks to his renting their flat. He also accused them of trying to impose their way of life on him and said “the fact that someone belongs to a religion does not permit them to inconvenience others.”

The tribunal didn’t see it that way — especially after the tenants introduced their landlord’s Facebook page that had a “joke” about a devout Arab Muslim that they found offensive. Alabi told the hearing “he had freedom of speech and could post what he wanted on his Facebook page ... He did not share the post to attack anyone. He said he shared it only because it made him laugh.”

Be careful what you post online — Pickel saw it as further evidence of his bias.

“When considered together, I find that the comment ‘welcome to Ontario, Canada,’ the making of loud pounding noises outside the applicants’ door shortly after making that comment, and (Alabi)’s refusal to remove his shoes when entering (their) prayer space amounted to harassment under the Code.”

In addition to paying them $6,000 each for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect, Alabi must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.”

Read Mandel Wednesday through Saturday
 
下一个头条新闻我都想好了:多伦多某房东拒绝租房给和平教,被判罚$12000。
 
感觉这个是合理的吧。别人还住在里面,算是私人空间,这个房东比较鲁莽。
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的