同情特朗普

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
upload_2017-9-8_23-5-4.png


A French artist has erected a 20-metre-tall photo of a toddler peering over the US-Mexico border wall in the same week President Donald Trump scrapped an immigration program protecting young people illegally brought to the US as children.

The artist, who goes by the moniker JR, said the portrait of one-year-old Kikito, who lives in the border town of Tecate, was spurred by a dream in which he imagined a kid looking over the wall.

"And when I woke up, I wondered: 'What was he thinking?'" he said.

"For us we know the implication, what it represents, how it divides. But for a kid, I didn't have the answer."

In the photo, the boy appears to grip the barrier with his fingers, leaving the impression the entire thing could be toppled with a giggle.

The artwork went up the same week Mr Trump said he would end a program that has allowed young immigrants brought to America illegally as children to remain in the country and provided them with a pathway to citizenship.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, also known as Dreamers, was put in place by former president Barack Obama.

But Mr Trump has ordered a phased-out dismantling that gives a gridlocked Congress six months to decide the immigrants' fate.

The Trump administration also accepted more proposals for its plans to build a continuous wall along the approximately 3,200-kilometre border.

But JR said he had not intended the project coincide with the news about the young immigrants program.

Instead, he said it is part of his long-term work to highlight the "Ellis Islands of today," which has taken him from the shores of Italy where migrants have been arriving by boat from Africa to the California desert.

"Now as an artist I think that it's amazing that the piece arrived at a moment when it creates more dialogue," he said. "Because the idea itself is to raise more questions."

JR has done other large-scale portraits around the world, with much of his recent work focused on immigrants and refugees.


Photo: This is the view of Kikito from the southern side of the US-Mexico border. (Twitter: @JRart)


'Larger than life'
On Friday, a steady stream of people drove to the remote section of wall near the Tecate border crossing, about 64 kilometres southeast of San Diego.

Border Patrol agents warned visitors to keep the dirt road clear for their patrols and not pass anything through the fence.

Edmond Davantes, a software developer from Carlsbad, California, took photos from the US side.

"It's larger than life," he said. "It just draws attention to the whole issue in a positive way."

On the Mexican side, families scrambled down a scrubby hillside to take selfies with the artwork. Children in school uniforms played tag under the scaffolding holding the photo.

People on each side of the wall waved to each other.

Salma Montoya, 18, took a bus to Tecate to see it. She said the town is abuzz about the artwork. "It's beautiful," she said.

For artists and activists, the 1,000 kilometres of existing wall and fencing between the US and Mexico has long been a blank canvas.

Musicians have played simultaneously on both sides. A giant wooden Trojan-style horse was once parked near a crossing in Tijuana. There have been volleyball games and church services held simultaneously on each side of the border.

Sections of wall on the Mexican side are painted with everything from butterflies to an upside-down American flag.

The latest piece will remain in Tecate for a month. JR hopes people will view it from each side.

AP
 
708568


Most coverage of this has focused on the newsworthiness of Bannon questioning President Trump’s less-than-impeccable judgment. But the real news here is that Bannon’s perspective suggests that people very close to Trump believe that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III could destroy this entire presidency.

Here’s the key exchange with Charlie Rose:

BANNON: I don’t think there’s any doubt that if James Comey had not been fired we would not have a special counsel, yes.

ROSE: So we would not have the Mueller investigation.

BANNON: We would not have the Mueller investigation, we would not have the Mueller investigation in the breadth that clearly Mr. Mueller is going. … Because I think directionally it’s a very different investigation.

Keep that idea of “the breadth that clearly Mr. Mueller is going” in the back of your head. Now here’s more:

ROSE: Someone said to me that you described the firing of James Comey — you’re a student of history — as the biggest mistake in political history.

BANNON: That probably would be too bombastic even for me, but maybe modern political history.

ROSE: The firing of James Comey was the biggest mistake in modern political history.

BANNON: I think, if you’re saying that that’s associated with me, then I’ll leave it at that.

In modern political history, if we’re just sticking to presidential scandals (and not policy decisions such as George W. Bush deciding to invade Iraq), then we have some pretty big mistakes. There’s Bill Clinton’s decision to have an affair with Monica Lewinsky. There’s Ronald Reagan’s decision to sell arms to terrorists so the profits could be used to fund an illegal war in Central America. Then there are any number of decisions Richard Nixon made — authorizing a coverup of the Watergate break-in, putting a recording system in the Oval Office — that led him to resign.

If firing Comey was bigger than all of them, what does that mean? It can only mean that it could end Trump’s presidency. Anything less would make it a big mistake, but not the biggest. Bannon’s unspoken logical chain goes like this: Trump fires Comey, which leads to the appointment of a special counsel, which leads to the discovery of terribly damaging information about Trump, which brings him down, either through resignation or impeachment.

We should say that it’s possible that a special counsel would have been appointed even if Trump had not fired Comey, though it certainly made it much more likely — particularly after Trump went on national TV and said that he fired Comey in order to shut down the Russia investigation, then reportedly told the Russian ambassador and foreign minister the same thing. If that winds up becoming the core of a case that Trump committed obstruction of justice, then Bannon would be right.

Now, it’s of course possible that Bannon didn’t mean to imply any such thing. After all, Bannon also insisted in this interview that there was absolutely nothing to the Russia scandal. Even with what we know so far, that’s not true. There’s copious evidence of Russia’s efforts to manipulate our election in order to help Trump win, and at the very least we know that key members of Trump’s inner circle — his first-born son, his son-in-law and closest adviser, and his campaign manager — were eager to meet with people connected to the Russian government in the hopes that they could provide dirt on Hillary Clinton that the campaign could deploy against her. We’ll probably find out even more about what went on during the campaign.

But Bannon said something else here that is suggestive: He noted that the “breadth” of Mueller’s probe is now a lot wider than it otherwise might have been. Which means the Russia story may not be what Bannon is really worried about. He surely knows that there is equal if not more danger to Trump in the likelihood that the special counsel’s investigation will go beyond questions about the election. He’s saying that the Comey firing opened up the investigation to go into areas where it otherwise wouldn’t have.

If in the course of his investigation Mueller comes across evidence of a crime, he’s permitted and even obligated to pursue it, even if it doesn’t have anything to do with the questions about the campaign that were the initial justification for the investigation. And because investigating the Russian connection to the election requires an examination of Trump’s intricate web of financial connections with Russian interests (including a colorful collection of oligarchs and mobsters), the chances that Mueller will find something fishy or even criminal are very high indeed. No one who has carefully followed Trump’s business career believes that there isn’t some very shady stuff lurking about there.

After all, this is likely one of the main reasons Trump was willing to endure so much criticism over not making his tax returns public. Those returns, which detail the income he gets from hundreds of different sources, are essentially a gigantic pile of threads; start pulling on them one at a time and there’s no telling what you might find.

Bannon may not know where all of the bodies are buried (so to speak) in Trump’s long and varied career in real estate and casinos, or exactly why it is that Russian interests have showered Trump with hundreds of millions of dollars over the years. But he knows enough to know that if you have a special prosecutor with ample resources and authority and a team of specialists in financial crimes rooting around, they’re going to find something. Maybe a lot of somethings. And Bannon knows, or at least appears to believe, that it could bring this presidency down.
 
  1. 708682


    WASHINGTON — The just-departed chief White House strategist referred to the firing of FBI director James Comey as perhaps the biggest mistake in modern political history, commenting in his first televised interview since leaving government.

    Donald Trump’s ex-strategist and campaign manager insisted he will continue to support the president’s agenda against the pro-trade, pro-globalization Republican establishment they both deeply disdain.

    But Steve Bannon made clear his view that Trump set in motion a damaging chain-reaction by firing the former FBI director this spring. He offered a no comment when asked whether the firing was supported by one of his political nemeses: Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

    “The media has reported I was adamantly opposed to that,” Bannon told a “60 Minutes” interview, in an exchange left out of Sunday’s broadcast.

    “I don’t think there’s any doubt that if James Comey had not been fired we would not have a special counsel… We would not have the Robert Mueller investigation. We would not have the Mueller investigation in the breadth that clearly Mr. Mueller is going.”

    When asked about media reports that Bannon supposedly viewed the firing as the biggest mistake in political history, he at first called that slightly bombastic, then added a caveat: “Maybe modern political history.”

    The tumult caused by the FBI director’s firing prompted Justice Department officials to name a special investigator. The investigator, Mueller, is now reportedly examining a range of alleged incidents including obstruction of justice and money-laundering, and numerous White House staff and presidential associates have hired lawyers.

    Bannon was asked whether he agreed with some Trump allies who want to try firing Mueller. He said: “No, I do not.” When asked about media reports that Kushner pushed for Comey’s firing, he said: “You will have to find that out either through the media or through the investigation.”

    Kushner is among the numerous rivals he clashed with in the White House.

    In the “60 Minutes” interview, he sought to settle scores with a few of them. He suggested economic adviser and Democrat Gary Cohn should resign, rather than complaining publicly about the way Trump handled the racial incident in Charlottesville.

    He also accused the Republican party leadership of trying to block Trump’s agenda.

    The congressional wing of the party is more supportive of trade deals like NAFTA, more favourable to immigration, and less supportive of funding a wall with Mexico, than Trump is.

    “The Republican establishment is trying to nullify the 2016 election,” Bannon told the interviewer Charlie Rose.

    “That’s a brutal fact we have to face… I think (Senate Leader) Mitch McConnell, and to a degree, (House Leader) Paul Ryan, they do not want Donald Trump’s populist, economic nationalist agenda to be implemented. It’s very obvious.”

    He suggested a current split over undocumented children could rip the party apart. He predicted a nationalist, populist movement will prevail in American politics — but it’s not yet clear whether it will be of a left-wing or right-wing variety.

    Bannon said that depends on whether Republicans or Democrats take up the cause of trade-skepticism.
 
班农:将科米撤职可能是现代政治史上最大错误
VOA, 2017年9月12日 04:30

AE5965D5-BB18-44FC-9ADA-02A7B21F7508_w1023_r1_s.jpg

时任白宫首席战略师的班农等待总统川普就美国改变在巴黎气候协定问题上的立场发表声明。(2017年6月1日)

华盛顿 — 前白宫首席战略师史蒂文·班农认为他的前上司川普总统将联邦调查局局长科米解职,犯下了可能是“现代政治史上”最大的错误。

科米5月9日被撤职之前负责联调局有关俄罗斯据称与川普竞选班子勾结干预美国去年大选的调查。 白宫先是说,科米被撤职是因为他对川普竞选对手希拉里·克林顿滥用私人电邮服务器一事调查不利。

但川普几天后推翻了这个解释,他在接受美国全国广播公司(NBC)新闻节目采访时说, 他决定将科米撤职,想到的是“这个俄罗斯事情”。

川普一直争辩说,他的竞选团队在2016年总统竞选期间并未与俄罗斯勾结。他说,有人企图把他的竞选与莫斯科联系起来,是因为民主党人要为败选找理由。

美国司法部的第二把手罗德·罗森斯坦副部长在科米被撤职八天之后,不顾川普反对, 任命前联调局局长穆勒为独立检察官,负责调查川普竞选班子是否与俄罗斯相勾结以及川普将科米撤职是否涉嫌妨碍司法。

班农在接受哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)“60分钟”节目采访时说,“我认为, 毫无疑问,如果詹姆斯·科米没有被撤职, 我们就不会有一位独立检察官, 不会有穆勒显然想要进行的广泛调查。”

班农是川普民粹主义竞选活动晚期的一个关键人物,他一直是川普的高级顾问之一,但上个月在白宫办公厅主任凯利上任后被迫辞职。

班农立刻返回他在极右翼网站“布莱巴特新闻”的领导岗位。他说,他计划利用这个平台,在川普总统整个任期之内,在外面做川普的“边锋”。
 
upload_2017-9-13_0-30-38.png


Carter's criticisms, offered at his annual presentation to backers of his post-presidency Carter Center in Atlanta, went beyond Trump, but he was particularly critical of the nation's direction under the Republican president's leadership.

The 39th president, a Democrat, offered this advice to the 45th: "Keep the peace, promote human rights and tell the truth."

Carter, 92, did not mention explicitly Trump's threatening exchanges this summer with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, but the former president said the U.S. should engage directly with the insular leader and discuss a peace treaty to replace the cease fire that ended the Korean War in 1953.

"I would send my top person to Pyongyang immediately, if I didn't go myself," Carter said, noting that he's been three times to the country, even as successive U.S. administrations have refused to deal with the regime.

The North Koreans, Carter said, want a treaty that guarantees the U.S. will not attack unless North Korea attacks the U.S. or an ally, particularly South Korea. "Until we talk to them and threat them with respect — as human beings, which they are — I don't think we're going to make any progress," Carter said.

He also dismissed Trump's optimism that he can engineer Middle East peace. Trump has tasked his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, with handling the issue that has vexed U.S. administrations for generations, but the president notably backed off the long-held U.S. position calling for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians.

Carter said he is "practically hopeless" that anything Trump comes up with would give "justice to the Palestinians."

"I don't think Trump or his family members are making any process in that respect," he said. Carter criticized both Israeli and Palestinian leaders for a lack of flexibility, but he singled out Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netenyahu, a Trump ally, for having "no intention at all of having a two-state solution."

The former president and his wife, Rosalynn, largely steer clear of partisan politics, long having yielded any active role in the Democratic Party. But they maintain their high-profile advocacy through the Carter Center, which focuses on human rights, public health and democratic elections.

Carter on Tuesday defended the center's role in monitoring the August presidential elections in Kenya that the country's Supreme Court later discarded. The court has ordered a new election.

The Carter Center's monitoring team, led by former Secretary of State John Kerry, said days after the vote that the process of casting paper ballots was fair, but that the electronic tabulations were "unreliable." Carter said Tuesday that international monitors were not allowed to observe the counting process.

The center also remains engaged in trying to end the Syrian civil war, Carter said. He noted that he and others from the center have engaged Russian President Vladimir Putin and others trying to broker peace.

Carter touted a program at his center that tracks social media usage in the war-torn nation. By identifying the locations of individual posters with known political and military affiliations, Carter said, analysts can discern which factions control various cities and provinces. Carter said the center shares that intelligence with the Pentagon, the State Department, various media outlets and foreign allies of the U.S.

Carter made no mention of ongoing inquiries into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign or potential ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.

At 92, Carter is second eldest living U.S. president and fourth longest-lived president in history. His birthday is Oct. 1. George H.W. Bush, the eldest living president, turned 93 on June 12, putting him 92 days into his 94th year. Ronald Reagan was 120 days beyond his 93rd birthday when he died in 2004. Gerald Ford died two years later, having lived 165 days beyond his 93rd birthday.

Carter already has the longest post-presidency, having been out of office for 36 years and almost 8 months.
 
为啥总得与前任比、自吹自擂呢?

无奈而为之而已。

upload_2017-9-13_15-52-4.png
 
老板语无伦次了!

upload_2017-9-15_14-35-53.png
 
后退
顶部