同情特朗普

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间

Fake news 报导Trump新闻的角度总是别出心裁(别有用心:)),狗屁“文章”写得精致异常(魔鬼在wording的细节中:mad:),有时还富有创意(

意淫的结果?),常常又出人意料(无中生有)​


:shale:
 
最后编辑:

POS No1.​

“A spokesperson for the city of Wildwood told the Associated Press that she estimated between 80,000-100,000 people had attended the rally of Mr Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. However, the Trump campaign has been known to exaggerate crowd sizes in the past, and reporters on the scene questioned the numbers.”


葡萄好酸啊:)

这句话的逻辑多别扭? 如果数字虚夸,也是city spokeperson,关Trump campaign什么事?这也是Fake News常见手法之一:混淆视听 + 栽赃嫁祸,而且是明目张胆,毫无技术含量的那种。


其次,记者知道有多少人吗?

退一步讲,现场人数10万,8万,7万,6万,重要吗?matter的是:
- 深蓝州5000+人小镇
- expected 4万人
- 实际到场人数远远超过4万
- 到场群众的热情更不是fake news希望看完的
 
最后编辑:

The prosecution could wrap its case this week after telling the judge on Friday that they expected to call just two more witnesses.

The trial is in its 16th day
 

POS No2.​

“After spending much of the past month in a Manhattan courtroom for his hush money criminal trial, the former president wasted no time in once again railing against the unfairness of the case, which he claimed is a “Biden show trial”. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr Biden has been involved in the case”

Biden show trial:只有当Biden本人直接参与,才能叫这个?副总统参与了算了算? 白宫其他人算不算?DOJ(note:跟在任总统站在一个阵营的DOJ)算不算?这里耍了一个文字游戏 ”Mr Biden has been involved“.

No evidence:当然了,只要那边阵营的坏消息都是no evidence,比如硬盘门,比如Burisma丑闻,比如希婆email门...


unfairness. 到了现在还坚持这是个“fair trial”的人,阿Q再次不揣冒昧揣度一下:

- 有知识,有文化,有学历,有“智慧”,就是完全没有“思考能力”的人,除了听主流媒体,没有能力判断事情真伪

- fair不fair,并不重要。关键是要跟主流媒体走,这是混主流的基本入门券。貌似跟鲁迅的那些看客有些相似?
- 当然,还有那些以颠倒黑白为职业的各路媒体从业人员和政客
 
最后编辑:

POS No3.​

"Merchan imposed an order which bars Mr Trump from hurling insults at witnesses, jurors, prosecutors, court staff and the judge’s family. However, it does not forbid him from insulting Judge Merchan or Mr Bragg. Mr Trump has already been fined for 10 separate violations of the gag order, totalling $10,000."


这些就叫“Insulting?seriously?


 

POS No 4.​

"The former president faces 34 charges of falsifying business records in relation to alleged hush money payments of $130,000 which were made to porn star Stormy Daniels in order to conceal an alleged affair in 2006. He has denied the allegations."

这是与这个案子有关的所有报导的核心问题,就像当年铺天盖地“Russian Collusion”,但是没有人知道怎么个Collude法!


Fake News总是拿庞大的34 charges来吓人,为什么没有一篇文章/一个人愿意

1)或者详细地介绍Trump究竟做错了什么事?犯了什么罪?

2)或者用老百姓听得懂的话简单概述一下Trump做错了什么事?犯了什么罪?

因为:

 
还有,这些丑陋的用词,还有整篇“文章”酸溜溜的味道:

Hordes of MAGA fans

Trump dubs/blasting/rhetoric/attacked vs Biden "Joked"

his speech was littered with

....


这些都是Fake News报导Trump的标准操作,不稀奇。只是,这有点侮辱了“独立报/Independent”这个词

反正这些狗屁文章都大同小异,就不浪费时间一一较真了:)
 

Trump gets nasty in New Jersey as he dubs Biden a total moron and Manhattan prosecutor ‘fat Alvin’​


忘了最基本的 :mad::mad::mad: 他们 totally

OK for 政治迫害
OK for lawfare for 干扰大选
OK for 司法过程中的不公
。。。

却不OK骂这些丑恶角色,或者起个花名

能够发生在Trump身上的事情,早晚也会发生在普通老百姓身上。事实上,这已经早就在韭菜的日常生活中一再发生了...
 
还有,这些丑陋的用词,还有整篇“文章”酸溜溜的味道:

Hordes of MAGA fans

Trump dubs/blasting/rhetoric/attacked vs Biden "Joked"

his speech was littered with

....


这些都是Fake News报导Trump的标准操作,不稀奇。只是,这有点侮辱了“独立报/Independent”这个词

反正这些狗屁文章都大同小异,就不浪费时间一一较真了:)
呵呵,想当年我根本不关心川普的时候,我就从没在媒体上看过任何一个稍稍对川普正面点的新闻,我当时在想,这样的人怎么才当上美国总统的,于是乎开始看川普的采访,他发的推特,认真观察这个人,只要智力正常的,看几个月就基本明白是怎么回事情拉,可惜挺多智商貌似还可以的家伙,这么多年还是煞笔一样。
 
呵呵,想当年我根本不关心川普的时候,我就从没在媒体上看过任何一个稍稍对川普正面点的新闻,我当时在想,这样的人怎么才当上美国总统的,于是乎开始看川普的采访,他发的推特,认真观察这个人,只要智力正常的,看几个月就基本明白是怎么回事情拉,可惜挺多智商貌似还可以的家伙,这么多年还是煞笔一样。

是啊,俺只回Trump的帖子,因为最简单,最容易搞清楚 :mad:
 
后退
顶部