福省长在法庭挑战碳税出师不利

谷歌大侠

知名会员
注册
2014-11-17
消息
1,073
荣誉分数
383
声望点数
193
需要继续努力,加油!

Judges grill Ontario over Doug Ford's carbon tax challenge
https://www.nationalobserver.com/20...-ontario-over-doug-fords-carbon-tax-challenge
......
The court questioned whether residents will actually be paying more.

“How is it a burden if 90 per cent of the money goes back to the same people who paid it?” one of the justices asked the provincial government's lawyer.

Ontario attorney Josh Hunter replied that the rebate don't consider the differing needs of different Ontario residents. Those living in rural areas, for example, face a higher tax burden and increased heating needs, he argued.

In fact, the federal plan provides for those in small and rural communities to get an extra 10 per cent back "in recognition of their increased energy needs and reduced access to energy-efficient transportation options."

Hunter said there was no guarantee that the rebates would be used by residents on climate action. In fact, he said they "could be used to buy a Hummer.”
 
Bill Kelly: Day one of Ford’s carbon tax legal challenge didn’t go well
https://globalnews.ca/news/5171890/carbon-tax-doug-ford/

......
The Ford government claims that the tax will drive up prices on gas and heating fuel and related costs for Ontario residents; that’s been one of the main talking points that Ford has used often.

But, the court questioned that assertion.

The judges asked, how is it a burden if 90 per cent of the money goes back to the same people who paid it and the remainder funds infrastructure projects?

The judicial panel also acknowledged that the carbon tax wouldn’t even be an issue in Ontario had the Ford government not scrapped the cap and trade program that was instituted by the previous government.

To their credit, and much to the chagrin of the climate change deniers, Ontario government lawyers agreed that climate change is real and greenhouse gases do contribute to the problem.

But, they probably hurt their cause when they postulated that there was no national systemic risk caused by climate change and greenhouse gases.

That argument adds credence to the feeling held by many that Ford’s court challenge is motivated more by his disdain for this federal government than it is for concern for the environment.
 
这个可以安省全民公投吗
 
这个可以安省全民公投吗
福省长不会决定安省全民公投的,因为全民公投福省长输的可能性比在法庭上输的可能性要大多了。民调显示,大部分民众支持碳税。

More Canadians now support a carbon tax than oppose it: poll
https://ipolitics.ca/2018/11/01/more-canadians-now-support-a-carbon-tax-than-oppose-it-poll/

NEW POLL: MOST CANADIANS SUPPORT, WITH QUALIFICATIONS, CARBON PRICING.
https://abacusdata.ca/new-poll-most-canadians-support-with-qualifications-carbon-pricing/
 
Bill Kelly: Day one of Ford’s carbon tax legal challenge didn’t go well
https://globalnews.ca/news/5171890/carbon-tax-doug-ford/

......
The Ford government claims that the tax will drive up prices on gas and heating fuel and related costs for Ontario residents; that’s been one of the main talking points that Ford has used often.

But, the court questioned that assertion.

The judges asked, how is it a burden if 90 per cent of the money goes back to the same people who paid it and the remainder funds infrastructure projects?

The judicial panel also acknowledged that the carbon tax wouldn’t even be an issue in Ontario had the Ford government not scrapped the cap and trade program that was instituted by the previous government.

To their credit, and much to the chagrin of the climate change deniers, Ontario government lawyers agreed that climate change is real and greenhouse gases do contribute to the problem.

But, they probably hurt their cause when they postulated that there was no national systemic risk caused by climate change and greenhouse gases.

That argument adds credence to the feeling held by many that Ford’s court challenge is motivated more by his disdain for this federal government than it is for concern for the environment.
出师不利就接着再来。关键是还承认碳排放造成气候变化。还不如学学TRUMP,尚未定论的先一概否认。
 
出师不利就接着再来。关键是还承认碳排放造成气候变化。还不如学学TRUMP,尚未定论的先一概否认。
我也看不懂代表福省长的律师是怎么回事,难道希望福省长输掉官司?
 
我也看不懂代表福省长的律师是怎么回事,难道希望福省长输掉官司?
在这个问题上,福特不傻,知道环保这面大旗不能扔。这也是他从竞选以来一直强调的。但是他的政策就不一样了。他让排放大户自愿减排,政府给予奖励。这样就既保住了大旗,又保住了排放大户的利益。至于是否真能减排,他CARE吗?
 
福省长不会决定安省全民公投的,因为全民公投福省长输的可能性比在法庭上输的可能性要大多了。民调显示,大部分民众支持碳税。
More Canadians now support a carbon tax than oppose it: poll
https://ipolitics.ca/2018/11/01/more-canadians-now-support-a-carbon-tax-than-oppose-it-poll/

NEW POLL: MOST CANADIANS SUPPORT, WITH QUALIFICATIONS, CARBON PRICING.
https://abacusdata.ca/new-poll-most-canadians-support-with-qualifications-carbon-pricing/
数据造假是左派最喜欢的事
 
反對一切形式的加稅。TNND,加拿大的稅太高了。
 

福省长不会决定安省全民公投的,因为全民公投福省长输的可能性比在法庭上输的可能性要大多了。民调显示,大部分民众支持碳税。

More Canadians now support a carbon tax than oppose it: poll
https://ipolitics.ca/2018/11/01/more-canadians-now-support-a-carbon-tax-than-oppose-it-poll/

NEW POLL: MOST CANADIANS SUPPORT, WITH QUALIFICATIONS, CARBON PRICING.
https://abacusdata.ca/new-poll-most-canadians-support-with-qualifications-carbon-pricing/
我不信在安省公投会输。
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的