花袜子变可怜虫?

ccc

难得糊涂
管理成员
VIP
注册
2003-04-13
消息
211,612
点数
1,393
  • upload_2019-9-9_11-5-35.png


    There was plenty of fresh data to analyze this week as we stand only six weeks away from the 43rd federal general election, so let’s recap the past week of polling:
    • Last week, Abacus Data unveiled its latest federal numbers. The Conservatives (34 per cent) and Liberals (33 per cent) remain tied on top of voting intentions nationally, but once again the regional breakdowns remain in favour of the Liberals: Abacus measures a 4-point lead in Ontario and 12-point lead in Quebec for the LPC. Out west, the Conservatives dominate Alberta by 37 points and the Prairies by 24 points. See Abacus’ full report here.
    • Nanos Research‘s weekly polls have not been reported on lately because they are behind a subscription paywall (to which you may subscribe here). But Nik Nanos himself was on CTV News this week with Don Martin and showed its latest results: Liberals (35 per cent) lead nationally by four points over the Conservatives (31 per cent).
    • On Saturday night, Campaign Research released its newest data: Unsurprisingly, Campaign also has the LPC and CPC tied nationally (at 34 per cent apiece), but its regional numbers differ from Abacus or Léger, especially in Ontario where Campaign has the Liberals and Conservatives tied in the province at 36 per cent. You may find Campaign Research report here.
    • Finally, on Monday Léger published the second part of its last federal poll which focused on Quebec (which had a considerable sample size of 1,000 respondents in Quebec). The poll showed the Liberals leading comfortably in the Montreal metropolitan area (19 points over the Bloc) and the Conservatives ahead in the Quebec City region. Léger’s complete report can be found here.
    As for the NDP, the latest waves of polls showed the party is going through hard times, but both Nanos (16 per cent) and Abacus Data (17 per cent) measure NDP support somewhat higher than the recent average. Strangely, it’s the NDP level of support on which Canadian pollsters can’t seem to agree on lately. While EKOS’ 7 per cent from two weeks ago seems to have been an outlier, polls in the field in August alone have measured the NDP as low as 11 per cent and as high as 17 per cent.

    Here are the popular vote projections with 95 per cent confidence intervals compared to last week’s national polls:



    [NR: Nanos Research; AD: Abacus Data; CR: Campaign Research.]

    The Conservatives and Liberals remain essentially tied on top of voting intentions with 34 per cent apiece. As we will see below, due to the high concentration of Conservative support in Alberta and Saskatchewan, a tied national vote gives a slight edge to the Liberals seat-wise.

    The NDP’s national average stands at 13.5 per cent. The Greens remain stable at 10.4 per cent. Maxime Bernier’s PPC is averaging 2.9 per cent support.

    In Quebec, the Bloc québécois gathers 19 per cent of support—a level similar to its 2015 result.

    Here are the seat projections in Canada:



    Over the course of 250,000 general election simulations, the Liberal Party wins an average of 165 seats, five seats short of a majority, and 24 seats above the Conservative average of 141 seats.

    However, when we analyze the seat projection more closely by breaking down the safe, likely, leaning and toss up projected seats per party, we discover that the Liberal lead is tenuous at best:



    The Liberals are projected leading in 63 districts that are labelled either “leaning” or “toss up”, by far more than any other party. In Quebec, a modest two-to-three point swing to the Bloc or the Conservatives could flip several rural seats in the province. (Léger measured the Liberals at only 29 per cent in Quebec outside of Montreal and Quebec City.) In Ontario, among the 30 GTA districts, more than half are projected leaning or toss ups, including several with the Liberals as current favourites. A moderate slip in the region could also hurt the Liberals and return the edge to the Conservatives.

    Nevertheless, with the data that is currently available, the 338Canada electoral model measures that the Liberals are two-to-one favourite to win the most seats:



    Although it may appear that the Liberals are hands on favourite, consider for a moment what the odds above indicate: Imagine you roll a dice. Numbers one through four mean the Liberals win the most seats. A five or a six means the Conservatives win. That’s how close this race is as of this writing.

    (This is the closest race I have covered so far: By comparison, Ford’s Progressive Conservatives and Legault’s CAQ were about 9-to-1 favourites according the same basic electoral model last year. Last April in Alberta, Jason Kenney’s United Conservatives were 25-to-1 favourites.)

    With still six weeks to go before Canadians head to the voting booths, the Liberals should not feel any comfort with these numbers. A few scattered points here and there could dramatically alter the seat projection. A single slip-up or mistake could make of break their re-election hopes.

    https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/the-latest-338canada-projection-the-liberals-uncomfortable-lead/
     

    GSD

    新手上路
    注册
    2019-06-16
    消息
    16
    点数
    3
    是老师就当个好老师,可惜碰到不少老师授不好业解不了惑。卖保险的就好好卖保险,偏自封个总裁、会长之类的,明摆着就是在诓人。
    啥总裁不总裁的,都是骗人的老套路了。
     

    ccc

    难得糊涂
    管理成员
    VIP
    注册
    2003-04-13
    消息
    211,612
    点数
    1,393
    华人一定要积极踊跃投票,一定要让土豆下台。
    你先安排好渥太华这8个选区吧。

    upload_2019-9-9_11-32-42.png
     

    GuardianAngel

    本站元老
    VIP
    注册
    2004-02-10
    消息
    11,388
    点数
    373
    哪里会可怜?
    他这4年,通过利益输送,给自己已经捞了不少好处。。。即使下台,他也过得比这里所有人强。

    下不下得了台还难说呢。。。
     

    RareEarth

    资深人士
    注册
    2012-10-10
    消息
    3,592
    点数
    273
    没有那个大公司的CEO和高管是民主投票投出来的。 靠能力一步一步爬上很公平。
    只要有适当的权力制约,精英制就不是专制,没有选举不见的是坏事。

    专制不是好东西,民主未必是好东西。希特勒、墨索里尼都是靠民主上台的。最伟大的两个人耶稣、苏格拉底都死于民主。土豆也是靠民主上台的,结果带来的是大麻、来路不明的难民、大批越境者、经济凋敝、治安恶化。
     

    GuardianAngel

    本站元老
    VIP
    注册
    2004-02-10
    消息
    11,388
    点数
    373
    是老师就当个好老师,可惜碰到不少老师授不好业解不了惑。卖保险的就好好卖保险,偏自封个总裁、会长之类的,明摆着就是在诓人。
    卖保险是一个大行业。里边总裁及非常成功的人士太多了。
    美国加拿大,每个西方国家,都有很多很多人在从事"卖保险"的生意。里面藏龙卧虎

    不喜欢sheer没关系,别诋毁"卖保险"这个职业
     

    ccc

    难得糊涂
    管理成员
    VIP
    注册
    2003-04-13
    消息
    211,612
    点数
    1,393
    下届政府应该是个少数政府,这最好。
     
    顶部