华裔选民有话说

[阿土仔]

你感觉什么不重要，只是你的感觉，你在社会的权重就你那一票。左党规模还在扩大，右党想往右多走几步，社会就抗议暴动。民心民意在左，你就自己烦恼吧。

呵呵，你不就是想说只能左，不能右，可太左了就会向右，木法子的事。

 

[照出个妖妖]

呵呵，你不就是想说只能左，不能右，可太左了就会向右，木法子的事。

我说，连个气泡都不起。安省自由党执政十几年，思右心切，右党保守党福特75%的支持率上台，现怎么样？到处被人喊打。
就你们鼓吹力捧的安省右党福娃，你们先对他一年的执政成效向CFCers做个汇报，纠正了那些左偏问题，再继续给喜娃捧场。你们的话才有credit 。

 

[照出个妖妖]

不过土豆也确实太讨厌了

左派伪善也是善，还知道个善字，能按规则行事。右党个个是口吐白沫的疯子狂徒，上台后什么妖娥子都能放出来。惹不起，离的越远越好。

 

[阿土仔]

我说，连个气泡都不起。安省自由党执政十几年，思右心切，右党保守党福特75%的支持率上台，现怎么样？到处被人喊打。
就你们鼓吹力捧的安省右党福娃，你们先对他一年的执政成效向CFCers做个汇报，纠正了那些左偏问题，再继续给喜娃捧场。你们的话才有credit 。

动了某些人的蛋糕当然会不高兴，这是常识。现在才执政一年，下结论是不是有点早？当然了，你的结论也许在福娃上台前就下好了，就像那个故事“兔子，谁让你不戴帽子？！”

 

[阿土仔]

左派伪善也是善，还知道个善字，能按规则行事。右党个个是口吐白沫的疯子狂徒，上台后什么妖娥子都能放出来。惹不起，离的越远越好。

你是说土豆伪善？
根据 “左派伪善也是善”的原理，那“不好也是好”喽！这逻辑可以独步天下了！

 

[照出个妖妖]

你是说土豆伪善？
根据 “左派伪善也是善”的原理，那“不好也是好”喽！这逻辑可以独步天下了！

老祖宗的智慧你又忘了。人性本恶，善的一面来自后天修养。“人之性恶，其善者，伪也。” “可学而能，可事而成之在人者谓之伪。”也就是说，“伪”不是与生俱来的，而是后天习得的。比如文明礼貌，这就是后天习得的，也就是“伪”。

你推祟西方极右翼毫不掩饰的恶，那是没训化好的野人。因为熟悉因为本性，所以喜欢

 

[照出个妖妖]

动了某些人的蛋糕当然会不高兴，这是常识。现在才执政一年，下结论是不是有点早？当然了，你的结论也许在福娃上台前就下好了，就像那个故事“兔子，谁让你不戴帽子？！”

先不谈分蛋糕钱财的事。谈谈社会意识形态，比如大麻性大纲同性恋问题。右党上台纠了哪些社会左偏问题？

 

[光放]

你可以去追随明神父了，you are ready。

首先六根不净，其次什么都不信。

 

[focus on today]

我也很讨厌土豆。但是现在情况看。如果社会朝右走。别的族裔都相对安全，首当其冲就是华人没跑。您想想是不是这么回事儿。咱别真弄到自己把自己埋了的地步
即使社会退步也是大家的事。先别搞到原先犹太人的境地才是华人应该关心的吧。

不知道你这逻辑从哪里来。 华人生性没有木们暴力，也比很多族裔勤奋，还是埋起头来，期望发财吧？不发财也无事，华人基本无所求，生存环境，由人家提供，这样省事，是吗？
为什么吃喝拉撒都在一个屋檐下，有人要来破坏这个房子，我们就只能两眼一闭，当着看不见呢？洪水滔滔，难道不是一滴水一滴水汇在一起才有那么大力量吗？

或者你是说，这世上人心里就是没有分辨能力的，社会的和平就是暴力维持的，人没有公义之心， 木们暴力所以一定会赢，工会胡搅蛮缠一定会赢？

 

[focus on today]

https://torontosun.com/opinion/colu...-unions-are-in-it-for-themselves-not-the-kids
LILLEY: Teachers unions are in it for themselves, not the kids
Brian LilleyMore from Brian Lilley


Published: September 30, 2019

Updated: September 30, 2019 6:31 PM EDT

This December, 2012 file photo shows teachers demonstrating against the former Ontario Liberal government's Bill 115 which imposed limits on teachers' right to strike. (Stan Behal, Toronto Sun)

Can we all just relax a little over the claim by some that 10,000 teachers are losing their jobs?

With contract talks underway, the rhetoric is rising and we will all hear that teachers will be thrown out onto the streets, that our kids’ education is at peril. Not quite.

In my view, a strike is inevitable, but so is looking at the facts.

We will not see 10,000 teachers fired or laid off over the next several years. Yes, I’m well aware of the report from the province’s Financial Accountability Office, but I’ve also read it.

The report clearly states what the government has been saying all along, based on the numbers, no teacher will lose their job. Instead, as the government promised, these positions will be eliminated as people retire or quit. The government and the FAO have different numbers on how many positions will be eliminated but not the final outcome.

That didn’t stop the union most affected by the changes from hitting the panic button.

“In the face of these numbers, it’s time for the Ford government and the Minister of Education to hit the reset button, abandon their current trajectory, and work with front-line educators to find a way forward that does not destroy publicly-funded education in Ontario,” Harvey Bischof, president of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation.

Destroying publicly-funded education?

I’m not sure how Bischof arrives at that conclusion. Destroying his union’s bottom line, sure. Most of the lost positions, eliminated once again by not replacing people who leave, will be high school teachers who are dues-paying members of his union.

That means less perks for Bischof and the rest of the union executive, but what will it mean for your kids in the classroom?

Well, if your kids are anywhere from Kindergarten to Grade 3, there will be no change at all, the classroom size remains capped at an average of 23 students and most classes already have fewer than 20 students in them.

For kids between Grades 4 and 8, the average class size will go up by one student to 24 and for high school students, the number will increase from and average of 22 last year to 28 four years from now.

That may seem shocking but not as shocking as me finding out that some of the classes my kids were in had only 15 students in them and this is at a large, well attended school.

• LILLEY: Private-school Trudeau claims to be saviour of public education
• LILLEY: Unions claim to be angels while threatening classroom stability
• LILLEY: Poll shows Canadians anxious about the economy

We’ve become addicted to the idea that our children need to be in small classes, that if they are in the smallest class possible, they will be geniuses! It isn’t true.
Not because our children aren’t capable of being geniuses but because the promise of class size has been massively oversold.

In 2017, researchers Wei Li from the department of education at the University of Missouri and Spyros Konstantopoulos, of Michigan State University, examined the impact of smaller class sizes in math results on students across 14 European countries.

“Class-size effects are generally non-significant,” they found, “in most European countries, class-size reduction does not have an impact on student achievement and does not close the achievement gap.”

Here in Ontario, the province more than doubled education spending between 2004 and 2018. In that same time period, the number of teachers grew by more than 13,000, the number of ECE workers rose by more than 9,000 and all of this happened even as enrolment dropped by 109,000. Oh, and math scores plummeted.

So, when you hear Bischof or other union leaders say that these changes will destroy public education, realize that he isn’t telling you the truth.

Bischoff is worried about two things: Obtaining more money for his members and how many teachers he can get to increase union funding.

When you hear from the unions that these contract talks are all about the students, make sure you translate that into plain English. It’s all about the money.

 

[照出个妖妖]

人不为己，天诛地灭。你来这，不是也为了讨上帝喜欢的，多为自己赎罪吗？

https://torontosun.com/opinion/colu...-unions-are-in-it-for-themselves-not-the-kids
LILLEY: Teachers unions are in it for themselves, not the kids
Brian LilleyMore from Brian Lilley


Published: September 30, 2019

Updated: September 30, 2019 6:31 PM EDT

This December, 2012 file photo shows teachers demonstrating against the former Ontario Liberal government's Bill 115 which imposed limits on teachers' right to strike. (Stan Behal, Toronto Sun)

Can we all just relax a little over the claim by some that 10,000 teachers are losing their jobs?

With contract talks underway, the rhetoric is rising and we will all hear that teachers will be thrown out onto the streets, that our kids’ education is at peril. Not quite.

In my view, a strike is inevitable, but so is looking at the facts.

We will not see 10,000 teachers fired or laid off over the next several years. Yes, I’m well aware of the report from the province’s Financial Accountability Office, but I’ve also read it.

The report clearly states what the government has been saying all along, based on the numbers, no teacher will lose their job. Instead, as the government promised, these positions will be eliminated as people retire or quit. The government and the FAO have different numbers on how many positions will be eliminated but not the final outcome.

That didn’t stop the union most affected by the changes from hitting the panic button.

“In the face of these numbers, it’s time for the Ford government and the Minister of Education to hit the reset button, abandon their current trajectory, and work with front-line educators to find a way forward that does not destroy publicly-funded education in Ontario,” Harvey Bischof, president of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation.

Destroying publicly-funded education?

I’m not sure how Bischof arrives at that conclusion. Destroying his union’s bottom line, sure. Most of the lost positions, eliminated once again by not replacing people who leave, will be high school teachers who are dues-paying members of his union.

That means less perks for Bischof and the rest of the union executive, but what will it mean for your kids in the classroom?

Well, if your kids are anywhere from Kindergarten to Grade 3, there will be no change at all, the classroom size remains capped at an average of 23 students and most classes already have fewer than 20 students in them.

For kids between Grades 4 and 8, the average class size will go up by one student to 24 and for high school students, the number will increase from and average of 22 last year to 28 four years from now.

That may seem shocking but not as shocking as me finding out that some of the classes my kids were in had only 15 students in them and this is at a large, well attended school.

• LILLEY: Private-school Trudeau claims to be saviour of public education
• LILLEY: Unions claim to be angels while threatening classroom stability
• LILLEY: Poll shows Canadians anxious about the economy

We’ve become addicted to the idea that our children need to be in small classes, that if they are in the smallest class possible, they will be geniuses! It isn’t true.
Not because our children aren’t capable of being geniuses but because the promise of class size has been massively oversold.

In 2017, researchers Wei Li from the department of education at the University of Missouri and Spyros Konstantopoulos, of Michigan State University, examined the impact of smaller class sizes in math results on students across 14 European countries.

“Class-size effects are generally non-significant,” they found, “in most European countries, class-size reduction does not have an impact on student achievement and does not close the achievement gap.”

Here in Ontario, the province more than doubled education spending between 2004 and 2018. In that same time period, the number of teachers grew by more than 13,000, the number of ECE workers rose by more than 9,000 and all of this happened even as enrolment dropped by 109,000. Oh, and math scores plummeted.

So, when you hear Bischof or other union leaders say that these changes will destroy public education, realize that he isn’t telling you the truth.

Bischoff is worried about two things: Obtaining more money for his members and how many teachers he can get to increase union funding.

When you hear from the unions that these contract talks are all about the students, make sure you translate that into plain English. It’s all about the money.

 

[focus on today]

人不为己，天诛地灭。你来这，不是也为了讨上帝喜欢的，多为自己赎罪吗？

人若忘记公义，见利忘义，也是天天诛地灭！

 

[gcy1208]

不知道你这逻辑从哪里来。 华人生性没有木们暴力，也比很多族裔勤奋，还是埋起头来，期望发财吧？不发财也无事，华人基本无所求，生存环境，由人家提供，这样省事，是吗？
为什么吃喝拉撒都在一个屋檐下，有人要来破坏这个房子，我们就只能两眼一闭，当着看不见呢？洪水滔滔，难道不是一滴水一滴水汇在一起才有那么大力量吗？

或者你是说，这世上人心里就是没有分辨能力的，社会的和平就是暴力维持的，人没有公义之心， 木们暴力所以一定会赢，工会胡搅蛮缠一定会赢？

你说的很对。但近一年我开始隐隐看到了反华的危险。华裔应该有点居安思危的意识了。
一旦社会出现问题，你觉得大众的矛头会指向吃救济不劳作，但是暴力倾向还团结的木木呢，还是指向开豪车住豪宅做好工作且不团结不反抗的华裔？现实就是，人家会认为是你把他们的工作职位占用了，把房价抬高了，是你才造成了他们的生活越来越差。
民众就是这样，即使你说的那些都对，他们也不会从自身出发去改变的，而民选出来的政党会考虑什么？会站在你这边吗？
所以说，你说的那些真的就是华裔美好的愿望。那些只能在中国行得通。在这边自己如何不被排挤才是最值得关心的。关心加拿大一定要在不排华的前提下
当然再说一遍，我认为你说的那些都对。但是大众是不是这么想的就不一定了

 

[照出个妖妖]

人若忘记公义，见利忘义，也是天天诛地灭！

为选票，信仰福音教的希尔去给同性恋立法保护。上帝都能背叛，上任后他同样会背叛选民。

 

[focus on today]

你说的很对。但近一年我开始隐隐看到了反华的危险。华裔应该有点居安思危的意识了。
一旦社会出现问题，你觉得大众的矛头会指向吃救济不劳作，但是暴力倾向还团结的木木呢，还是指向开豪车住豪宅做好工作且不团结不反抗的华裔？现实就是，人家会认为是你把他们的工作职位占用了，把房价抬高了，是你才造成了他们的生活越来越差。
民众就是这样，即使你说的那些都对，他们也不会从自身出发去改变的，而民选出来的政党会考虑什么？会站在你这边吗？
所以说，你说的那些真的就是华裔美好的愿望。那些只能在中国行得通。在这边自己如何不被排挤才是最值得关心的。关心加拿大一定要在不排华的前提下
当然再说一遍，我认为你说的那些都对。但是大众是不是这么想的就不一定了

我不觉得华人就是那么愚顽不化的，我也不觉得 其他族裔就是心全是黑的，唯独恨恶的就是勤恳做工的华人！他们就是恨恶华人努力工作，不恨恶不干活伸手要钱的人，也不恨恶贩毒闹事甚至杀人不发抖的人