uber airbnb 时代了,我愿意出租我的地盘,有什么不对的?大V说说?

贵圈

政府都对党
注册
2014-10-21
消息
32,854
荣誉分数
6,145
声望点数
373
City threatens legal action over driveway rented to spy agency employees
Social Sharing

Residents near CSIS, CSE headquarters rent out laneways to solve parking issues

Hillary Johnstone · CBC News · Posted: Jan 21, 2020 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: 3 hours ago

jevin-maltais-csis-parking.jpg

Jevin Maltais received a notice of zoning non-compliance from the City of Ottawa for renting out his driveway to federal employees. (Jean Delisle/CBC)

comments
A Beacon Hill resident says the City of Ottawa is threatening to take legal action against him if he doesn't stop renting out his unused driveway space to employees who work at the nearby headquarters of Canada's intelligence agencies.
Residents who live in the Beacon Hill-Cyrville Ward have complained to CBC News in the past that employees from the nearby headquarters of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and Communications Security Establishment (CSE) park on their streets.
Jevin Maltais said in an interview he thought he had found a solution to the persistent parking problem — and a way to earn a little extra income — by renting out his driveway to four federal employees.
"We had cars that were just lining both sides of the street," Maltais said. "The people who own the cars would put letters in our mailboxes saying, 'Do you have places for me to park? The city is ticketing me.'"
Notice of violation
But last week, Maltais received another letter in his mailbox, this time from the city's bylaw department.
According to the notice of violation, dated Jan.13, Maltais is breaking the city's parking rules by renting the spots out to non-tenants or residents, and must stop by Jan. 31. "Failure to comply with notice will result in further legal action," the notice states, adding that could happen "without further notice."
In a statement, the city said it has issued four notices of violation to property owners in Beacon Hill-Cardinal Heights since Jan 1, 2019, for renting out parking spaces on their properties.
"Allowing a driveway or legal parking space for a residential use to in effect be used as a commercial parking lot would no longer be a secondary use of the land, and may lead to additional traffic and nuisance concerns in conflict with the intent of a residential area," said the city in a statement attributed to David Wise, program manager for zoning and intensification.
Residents 'scared'
Maltais said he knows at least half a dozen other people who are also renting out driveway space, but who are now feeling scared after Maltais received a notice from the city warning him he's violating a zoning bylaw.
"We were pretty surprised and disappointed to see that it's actually legal action against us," said Maltais.
parking.jpg

Watch
Residents told to stop renting out driveway space or face consequences
  • 4 hours ago
  • 1:00


Beacon Hill resident Jevin Maltais thought he was solving a parking conundrum by renting out his driveway space to federal employees. But the city says he's not allowed to continue doing so, citing zoning rules. 1:00
Maltais said he doesn't see any downsides to renting out his own driveway, and hopes the city would consider a pilot project to allow residents to continue renting parking spots.
"We're pretty disappointed this is the city's stance on it currently, when really we've just as citizens tried to help the situation by getting the cars off the street," he said.
Backyards paved for parking
The area's city councillor said he understands the frustration, but said the rules on renting out driveways are clear.
"No municipalities allow people to be able to rent out their spots; they're not zoned that way. If they were zoned, they would have to hold a million dollars worth of commercial insurance," said Coun. Tim Tierney, who represents Beacon Hill-Cyrville.
Tierney said he knows of residents who have even paved their backyards to create parking spaces for federal workers

tim-tierney.jpg

City Councillor Tim Tierney says it's against zoning bylaws to rent out your driveway, and he 'strongly advises' that people obey the rules. (Jean Delisle/CBC)
He said paving backyard green space also breaks provincial regulations, since it doesn't allow for proper drainage on properties.
"When it gets to the point that you're in non-compliance, you're not zoned, it goes to a provincial level, it's actually not even the city," Tierney said.

In statements to CBC, both CSIS and CSE said they remind their employees to follow municipal parking rules, and encourage them to take public transit, carpool or cycle to work.
CSE also said it opened a new parking lot earlier this month with 400 spaces.
 
我A地住宿B地上班。
你A地上班B地下班。

你用我的车道,我用你的车道。正合适。省得给市政添乱,省得政府花人力物力到处开罚单。减少路面占用,减少冬季路面复杂度,提高冬季行车安全。
给市政府减少开支,减少汽油使用,减碳环保。提高办公效率。还有可能增加收入。。。。
 
最后编辑:
楼主,你的房子不是你说了算。你要是在里面开超市,bylaw回来罚你款。你要是故意一把火把你房子烧了,警察回来抓你,法院会判你
 
你说的,有理,但都不是occupy。

我的bedroom我愿意出租,我的车道我也愿意出租。

我没开超市,也没放火,为啥抓我?
 
这个细说就复杂了,你可以理解为是多数人的暴政吧。你住的这个地区多数人不愿意你这么做,你就不可以这么做。但就这方面说,中国比这里自由很多
 
这个细说就复杂了,你可以理解为是多数人的暴政吧。你住的这个地区多数人不愿意你这么做,你就不可以这么做。但就这方面说,中国比这里自由很多

看来咱这是要跟黑恶势力作斗争啊。
 
这个细说就复杂了,你可以理解为是多数人的暴政吧。你住的这个地区多数人不愿意你这么做,你就不可以这么做。但就这方面说,中国比这里自由很多
"但就这方面说,中国比这里自由很多"
的确。
Bylaw有些条款莫名其妙的,太过分了
 
我认为自由都是有限度的,具体到某些条款不好比较,总体来说,西方的法制比中国更加健全,对多数守法百姓是有利的。

比如对于出租房屋,车道的管制对周围邻居应当是好事,你不希望邻居把房子租给开爬梯,高噪音,喝酒吸毒,造炸弹,开妓院的吧?

比如这里孩子几岁以下必须有人陪,中国人从来是自己家看着办,没条件的,孩子早些成熟独立,没有硬性规定,也就无法可依。还有家暴家人孩子,w外人警察基本管不了,属于家务事。在这里看到谁敢以身试法?
 
你这过度引申了。
我认为自由都是有限度的,具体到某些条款不好比较,总体来说,西方的法制比中国更加健全,对多数守法百姓是有利的。

比如对于出租房屋,车道的管制对周围邻居应当是好事,你不希望邻居把房子租给开爬梯,高噪音,喝酒吸毒,造炸弹,开妓院的吧?

比如这里孩子几岁以下必须有人陪,中国人从来是自己家看着办,没条件的,孩子早些成熟独立,没有硬性规定,也就无法可依。还有家暴家人孩子,w外人警察基本管不了,属于家务事。在这里看到谁敢以身试法?


出租屋子无罪。
出租了屋子,搞出事儿。违规。

出租车道也应该无罪,
搞出车道妓院,违规。

一码归一码。这就可以理解,而且显示出ration来了。

不过车道上搞妓院,有点太low了。o_O
 
你这过度引申了。



出租屋子无罪。
出租了屋子,搞出事儿。违规。

出租车道也应该无罪,
搞出车道妓院,违规。

一码归一码。这就可以理解,而且显示出ration来了。

不过车道上搞妓院,有点太low了。o_O
我主要是针对“中国比这里自由很多”,自由不是越多越好,需要适度。
 
City 的信里这句话怎么理解?别的邻居有半打出租车道,只有他收到 City 的信,City 的理由是“与居住区意愿相违背的额外交通和扰民的担心”,我翻译的对吧?这个家伙是不是被邻居告了?车位给人用没事,干扰他人就不好了,,,或者,只是这个家伙人品问题,遇到一个神经衰弱的邻居,就是事儿多。

如果是每天晚上12点,加夜班的来停车,而且停的大张旗鼓。那的确是扰民。

要是朝九晚五来停车。一来一去,扰谁了?
 
我主要是针对“中国比这里自由很多”,自由不是越多越好,需要适度。
根据个人情况吧,我现在有小孩,承认这里适合家庭。但如果没有孩子,这里我是不愿意待的,因为已经被所谓的健全的法治搞得没有生机了,而且还在政治正确的内耗中不断走下坡路。
 
单位有停车场,为啥不去?
 
居住区外来人员多了,自然就不安全。
 
人家是间谍好乌拉?不能直接停在那。暴露。:eek:
 
后退
顶部