呼吁 CFC 在华人论坛上使用实名制

几位民主斗士不会非死不可,推特上也不敢以真面目示人吧?
 
我呼吁 CFC 论坛上禁止用户自己删贴,自己发出来的贴子就不要删了,实名制做不到,禁止用户自己删贴完全可以做到。
开玩笑,删帖多是管理员干的,是放空羡慕嫉妒恨的绝佳表演。 我的帖从来就不是我自己删的
 
实名?

 
以匿名的方式呼吁实名制是不是有点讽刺啊
 

How CBC's 'real name' commenting policy could work
Social Sharing
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
French-language Radio-Canada already requires online commenters to provide their full name

justin-li.jpg

Justin Li · CBC News · Posted: Mar 19, 2016 5:00 AM ET | Last Updated: March 30, 2016

computer-closeup.jpg

Some online commenters have welcomed CBC's 'real name' policy as a way to clean up the comments section, while others feel it will hinder free speech and have vowed to never comment again. (Getty Images)
2527
comments
CBC is in something of a quandary, after it announced Thursday it will bar readers from using pseudonyms when submitting comments to online articles, requiring users to sign up with their real names in hopes of deterring violations to the website's submission guidelines.
It's a problem that defies easy solutions.
Jennifer McGuire, general manager and editor in chief of CBC News, announced the policy change in a blog post.

Some are skeptical of the move, including Jeremy Hunsinger, professor of communications studies at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ont., who says the policy could "open up another set of problems," such as readers no longer wanting to comment.
Although a real name policy could be considered an overhaul of the CBC's comment section, it is not entirely unprecedented in the corporation's history.
'Same procedures as TV and radio'
CBC's and Radio-Canada's online comments are moderated through ICUC, a third-party social media moderating contractor based in Winnipeg.
Users who comment must set up an account and provide an email address, which is not made public. But unlike CBC, the French-language Radio-Canada has required users to provide their full name when they register to comment since 2011.
Pierre Champoux, director of digital news for Radio-Canada, says the move was both for transparency and to "elevate the quality of comments, make them more respectful."
"We wanted to implement the same procedures as TV and radio. People identify themselves to comment on air, so we want to do the same for online comments," says Champoux.
"We want to be transparent with our audience, and we want the audience to be transparent with us."

radio-canada-demo-20141116.jpg

Pierre Champoux, director of digital news for Radio-Canada, says the number of comments has risen in the five years since it put a real name policy in place. (Paul Chiasson/Canadian Press)
In order to post a comment, Champoux says, a user has to register and log in to Radio-Canada's membership centre, which requires a full name and an email address.
Although it's impossible to verify every name, moderators intervene if a user name is obviously a pseudonym.
"If people are willing to give us their real names, we will trust them," says Champoux, adding they can't "technically make sure" your name really is yours.
Champoux says the number of comments has risen in the five years since the policy was put in place, noting 10 to 15 per cent of comments submitted aren't approved because they don't comply with the guidelines.
"Tone [of the comments] hasn't changed radically," he says. "We don't agree with all of them, but that is not for us to decide."
Although he adds the policy allows people who did not want to comment before — "for fear of trolls" — to be more inclined to do so after the introduction of the policy, Champoux cannot confirm it to be the cause for the increase.
"I cannot say for sure," says Champoux. "But there has been no negative impact" from the policy.

Champoux says he is willing to offer advice to his English-language counterparts, should they introduce a similar policy.
"I am talking regularly with [CBC's senior director of digital news] Brodie Fenlon," says Champoux. "There is a committee looking at the issue, which we are both on."
"Will they implement [the same kind of policy]? I don't know," he says.
Facebook or Google log-ins a possibility
Hunsinger says there are other ways to "tie data to data" and try to make sure commenters use their real name.
"Some government sites use real, legal names," says Hunsinger.
Sites like those would need "two to three pieces of information, like a name or date of birth" and cross-verify the information from public databases to ensure you are who you say you are, he says.
Hunsinger recommends CBC use a commenting system like Disqus, which allows people to comment on multiple platforms and websites with the same username — which does not have to be the person's real name — by signing into an account with Facebook, Twitter, Google or email.
Champoux says Radio-Canada does not use social media log-ins.
'Not always the best thing'
Some have welcomed CBC's real name policy as a way to clean up the comments section, while others feel it will hinder free and anonymous speech and have vowed never to comment again.
Hunsinger leans more to the latter view, saying real name commenting policies are "not always the best thing."
Although he says they can somewhat reduce online harassment, noting multiple levels of authentication could potentially deter users who "just troll for temporary entertainment," he adds that real name commenting policies would not completely stop aggressive and hurtful comments.
"With real names, people tend to [harass others online] less," says Hunsinger. However, he adds "people bully face-to-face in real life" regardless of whether they know the person's name or not.
Hunsinger also says identities can be easily forged.

74863546cs046-border-patrol.jpg

The U.S. Border Patrol displays false identification cards in this file photo. Jeremy Hunsinger, professor of communications studies at Wilfrid Laurier University, says identities can be easily faked or fabricated for use in real name commenting. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Real name policies can work for people "not technologically competent," he says. Identities can be easily "faked, fabricated."
"Full names are supposed to be on Facebook. There are plenty of bots on Facebook," he says.
Hunsinger believes open commenting forums can lead to "positive changes to the world" that can help "inform and improve democracy" and warns real name policies could put off many potential commenters and hinder those ideals.
"What is real name [commenting policies] getting you?" questions Hunsinger. "How much free speech are you getting back?"
 

Real Name Policies on Facebook, LinkedIn, Quora and Google Plus: Clarified [Updated]
Posted by Ann Smarty to Social Media

Real Name Policies on Facebook, LinkedIn, Quora and Google Plus: Clarified
Since the start the web anonymity has been quite a hot controversy in social media world.
On one hand, everyone has the right to remain anonymous online to avoid personal attacks.
On the other hand, social media networks have been trying to promote “real” connections which resulted in many of them forcing “real name” policy on their users.
Let’s see what the “real name” policy is these days:
1. Facebook: “Authentic” Names
Facebook: Authentic Names

Facebook terms of service go into much detail explaining their “real name” policy noting that “the name you use should be the name your friends call you in real life“.
On October 1 2014, Chris Cox, Chief Product Officer of Facebook, also clarified:
Our policy has never been to require everyone on Facebook to use their legal name. The spirit of our policy is that everyone on Facebook uses the authentic name they use in real life…
We believe this is the right policy for Facebook for two reasons. First, it’s part of what made Facebook special in the first place, by differentiating the service from the rest of the Internet where pseudonymity, anonymity, or often random names were the social norm…
Their identification tools don’t seem to allow much freedom though because in order to confirm your identity, you are required to provide a photo IDs and you may not have one for the name your friends are using in real life…
2. LinkedIn: “True” Names
LinkedIn: True Names

Due to its professional nature, LinkedIn requires “true” names without clarifying what that means but noting that “pseudonyms, business names, associations, groups, email addresses, or other characters” are not allowed.
If you are one of multiple people using your professional pseudonym when registering a professional account at Linkedin, you may be in trouble. Here’s a very well-written, very well-grounded case by someone who is forced to be using their real name on Linkedin.
real name policy linkedin

The real issue is the personal safety of various categories of users, for making your name known can have serious – and even lethal – consequences in certain cases.
Think of political antagonists using the Internet to democratically criticize an oppressive regime; think of secular minorities living in countries with a mandatory State religion; think of social activists fighting an unjust establishment; think of people of ethnic origins operating in racist societies. Think, since we are on this website, of people discriminated against for their sexuality.
3. Quora: Use Your Legal Name
Quora: Use Your Legal Name

Founded by former Facebook employees, Quora is making the same mistake Facebook started with, the only difference being Quora has never tried correcting it standing firmly by their questionable decision.
Quora requires a “real full name” and explains that one should stand by their answers and the best way to do that is to use their real names. In case you are reported for not using your real name, you have to provide your ID which means you have to use your legal name.
They do have “reply anonymously” option to help those who don’t want their names to be associated with certain answers, but it’s not helpful to those who want to use their well-known monikers they use elsewhere.
While they say that they make exceptions sometimes, Quora real name policy is the major reason of its strongest users’ unhappiness (warning: NSFW language in that one)
Real name policy Quora

It is still hilarious to find such an adamant policy enforcers on the Internet, and it makes me wonder how Quora managed to put a bunch of lunatics to frame a policy on the Internet that forces users to reveal their identities.
While it sounds like LinkedIn, there is a marginal difference between the two networks. The former network requires such a deep level of credibility to enhance one’s network and still they never want to screw your name and they clearly don’t enforce it on you. The latter is just a Q/A network with a great user base. Somehow, they manage to mess everyone (except JJ Abrams and Soleio) with a naming policy.
4. Google Plus: No Restrictions Any More
Google Plus: No Restrictions

In an obvious effort to profile the web, Google started Google Plus with a very strict real name policy which ended up in lots of controversies.
The policy didn’t work for Google Plus well, especially when they started aggressively integrating it into Youtube (where few people use real names).
On July 15, 2014 it was announced that there were absolutely no restrictions as to what name you should use when registering an account at Google Plus.
What are your thoughts about social media real name policies? Share your thoughts!
 
Some online commenters have welcomed CBC's 'real name' policy as a way to clean up the comments section,

这就是 CFC 华人论坛 要用实名的原因。
 
支持! 您尊姓大名?
 
实名后大家就真正认识了。不用在外面装了。
 
支持CFC实名制,尤其是华人论坛上来实行。

支持我的请跟帖。 谢谢。
CFC就是一化妆舞会,全靠各界神仙共存维持生存。 :evil:
 
后退
顶部