美国昨天发表的针对中国的战略方针声明:United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China

谷歌大侠

知名会员
注册
2014-11-17
消息
1,076
荣誉分数
385
声望点数
193
16页的报告,似乎承认美国几十年的中国“接触”政策失败,要采取"对抗"政策,中美关系转向冷战?

United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China


Introduction

Since the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) established diplomatic relations in 1979, United States policy toward the PRC was largely premised on a hope that deepening engagement would spur fundamental economic and political opening in the PRC and lead to its emergence as a constructive and responsible global stakeholder, with a more open society. More than 40 years later, it has become evident that
this approach underestimated the will of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to constrain the scope of economic and political reform in China. Over the past two decades, reforms have slowed, stalled, or reversed. The PRC’s rapid economic development and increased engagement with the world did not lead to convergence with the citizen-centric, free and open order as the United States had hoped. The CCP has chosen instead to exploit the free and open rules based order and attempt to reshape the international system in its favor. Beijing openly acknowledges that it seeks to transform the international order to align with CCP interests and ideology. The CCP’s expanding use of economic, political, and military power to compel acquiescence from nation states harms vital American interests and undermines the sovereignty and dignity of countries and individuals around the world. To respond to Beijing’s challenge, the Administration has adopted a competitive approach to the PRC, based on a clear-eyed assessment of the CCP’s intentions and actions, a reappraisal of the United States’ many strategic advantages and shortfalls, and a tolerance of greater bilateral friction. Our approach is not premised on determining a particular end state for China. Rather, our goal is to protect United States vital national interests, as articulated in the four pillars of the 2017 National Security Strategy of the United States of America (NSS). We aim to: (1) protect the American people, homeland, and way of life; (2) promote American prosperity; (3) preserve peace through strength; and (4) advance American influence.
......
 
16页的报告,似乎承认美国几十年的中国“接触”政策失败,要采取"对抗"政策,中美关系转向冷战?

United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China


Introduction

Since the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) established diplomatic relations in 1979, United States policy toward the PRC was largely premised on a hope that deepening engagement would spur fundamental economic and political opening in the PRC and lead to its emergence as a constructive and responsible global stakeholder, with a more open society. More than 40 years later, it has become evident that
this approach underestimated the will of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to constrain the scope of economic and political reform in China. Over the past two decades, reforms have slowed, stalled, or reversed. The PRC’s rapid economic development and increased engagement with the world did not lead to convergence with the citizen-centric, free and open order as the United States had hoped. The CCP has chosen instead to exploit the free and open rules based order and attempt to reshape the international system in its favor. Beijing openly acknowledges that it seeks to transform the international order to align with CCP interests and ideology. The CCP’s expanding use of economic, political, and military power to compel acquiescence from nation states harms vital American interests and undermines the sovereignty and dignity of countries and individuals around the world. To respond to Beijing’s challenge, the Administration has adopted a competitive approach to the PRC, based on a clear-eyed assessment of the CCP’s intentions and actions, a reappraisal of the United States’ many strategic advantages and shortfalls, and a tolerance of greater bilateral friction. Our approach is not premised on determining a particular end state for China. Rather, our goal is to protect United States vital national interests, as articulated in the four pillars of the 2017 National Security Strategy of the United States of America (NSS). We aim to: (1) protect the American people, homeland, and way of life; (2) promote American prosperity; (3) preserve peace through strength; and (4) advance American influence.
......

不怕,不是说美帝都是纸老虎吗?
 
美国需要敌人,这是它得以保持一国的武力超过其它国家总和唯一原因。邓的和平发展道路在习的“英明"领导下向对抗竞争的方向发展。以前经常讲的韬光养晦好长时间没听到了。
 
美国人真正懂中共吗?我有时候是confused的。
 
美国总是在鹰派鸽派两边平衡,谁都可以号称很懂,出于不同立场和目的,采取各种不同,或者相似,相反的策略。
 
不是有一帮智库,其中不乏有很多从中国出来的。不能白拿钱吧。


从中国来的更差,绝对坏事。
他们说中国马上崩溃。美国啥也不用做,等着就好。
 
从中国来的更差,绝对坏事。
他们说中国马上崩溃。美国啥也不用做,等着就好。
照这么说是谎报军情,那应该什么什么的有了?
 
其实美国从来没有放弃颠覆中国,自从1949年开始就布局,看看历史,韩战越战,海上的包围链,直到1979年建交,30年中国没有倒,但是被西方封锁。
 
而从1979年开始的建交的原始动机还是为了颠覆中国政府,美国对中国的渗透和分化,中间经过了64、轰炸大使馆。。。到今天41年。如果没有病毒和石油危机,其实这种关系还会继续,但为了转嫁矛盾和责任,川普别无选择,只能开始一系列的冒险。这只是开始,我们不妨以最大的恶意来揣测最终的结果-----川一定会以最快的速度发动战争。
 
古巴就在他们家门口。
 
中国那边啥反应?
 
后退
顶部