CastleCode
AAA
都他妈是党争乱发纳税人的钱。
韭菜们真够煞笔的,主要是记性差,记不住7天的事。其实查的结果就是第一天说的,有外国政府干预,但没有改变大选最终结果,但扩大了土豆子的优势,当时保守党的领袖呕土太弱,豪无斗志,导致大选干预就不了了之了。之后的所有关于大选干预的调查都是政治斗争了,绿党和头巾都看过调查报告,说些故弄玄虚的话,pp拒绝看调查报告,被这些坏人内涵了好一阵子,呵呵,不看报告我也知道里面写啥,就是没有找到证据,或者不想找到证据,这些潜在叛国者一定是自由党当选的议员,否则逻辑上就出问题了。还记得外国干涉选举等事是警方违规泄露给媒体的,热炒了一阵,土豆总理任命前总督搞了个调查报告,没查出什么事,不罢休,要求public inquiry, Johnston辞职了,中国外交官赵某某也被驱逐了,如愿以偿彻查到底,今天最终报告也出来了,不知保守党满意了吗?
来了:David Johnston's first report on foreign interference
Five things we learned in David Johnston's first report on foreign interference
Special rapporteur David Johnston released his first report on foreign interference on Tuesday, which involved analyzing recent media reports on allegations by unnamed national security sources that China meddled in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.www.ctvnews.ca
呵呵,一直死硬支持土豆的前总督,反对公开听证干涉大选事物的DAVID JOHNSTON辞职
政府任命魁北克女法官领导Foreign Interference Public Inquiry
No public inquiry into foreign interference: Special rapporteur Johnston to undertake 'public hearings'
Updated May 23, 2023 12:44 p.m. EDT
- Rachel Aiello
- Senior Digital Parliamentary Reporter
Published May 23, 2023 6:03 a.m. EDT
OTTAWA -A public process is required on the issue of foreign interference, special rapporteur David Johnston says, but not in the form of a public inquiry.
Instead, Johnston announced Tuesday that he plans to hold "a series of public hearings with Canadians" to shine more light on the "problem of foreign interference" and inform the public...
- metropolis
- 回复: 31
- 论坛: 华人论坛
对呀。所以我们想让加拿大往好的方向学啊,别抱着坏的当好啊。那样的话还怎么变好啊,连啥叫好都不知道。但是我们都来到了加拿大,没有留在中国
有好有坏是客观现实啊。我原本以为搬家都是往更好的地方搬