2020年美国选举:众议院选举,民主党获得222席,共和党获210席,佩洛西再次当选众议院议长;参议院选举,形成民主党50:50共和党局面;国会正式认证,拜登以选举人团306票当选总统

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
德州起诉其他四个州,这个我看不懂。
只有这个方法可以上高院。其他方法都让低级法院枪毙了。大概认为高院才是川普开的
 
只有这个方法可以上高院。其他方法都让低级法院枪毙了。大概认为高院才是川普开的

嗯,起诉“违宪”。
 
只有这个方法可以上高院。其他方法都让低级法院枪毙了。大概认为高院才是川普开的
这四个州都是共和党主政吗?反正乔治亚是,没查其他几个。现在不争内华达,阿利桑那州了?
 
这四个州都是共和党主政吗?反正乔治亚是,没查其他几个。现在不争内华达,阿利桑那州了?
Pennsylvania - D
Georgia - R
Michigan - D
Wisconsin - D
 
50 min ago

Trump appeals to legislatures and Supreme Court in attempt to overturn election results​

From CNN's Kevin Liptak

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

While President-elect Joe Biden was introducing key members of his health team at an event in Delaware, President Trump spoke at a dueling event at the White House on coronavirus vaccines.

He made an explicit appeal to lawmakers and the US Supreme Court to help him overturn the results of an election he lost, his latest and most vocal attempt to cling to power even as his presidency comes to an end.

Speaking at a summit focused on the coronavirus vaccine, Trump was asked why no members of Biden's transition team were invited to participate, since it is that team who will oversee the bulk of the vaccine's distribution.

"We're going to have to see who the next administration is. Because we won in those swing states," Trump falsely claimed.

"Hopefully the next administration will be the Trump administration," he went on. "You can't steal hundreds of thousands of votes."

Remember: There has been no evidence of widespread voter fraud, according to the federal government and Republican and Democratic election officials.

Nonetheless, Trump insisted he won the election and made a direct appeal to state officials and members of the Supreme Court to assist him in his efforts to subvert the will of voters.

"Let's see whether or not somebody has the courage, whether it's legislators or legislatures or a justice of the Supreme Court or a number of justices of the Supreme Court," Trump said. "Let's see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right."
 
宾州共和党议员Mike 上诉到联邦最高法院的案子被否决了
 
宾州共和党议员Mike 上诉到联邦最高法院的案子被否决了
The decision was announced in an order with no noted dissents, as is typical for cases that are handled on an emergency basis.

The entirety of the court’s order read, “The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice [Samuel] Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.”
 
25 min ago

Supreme Court denies GOP effort to block certification of Pennsylvania election results​

From CNN's Ariane de Vogue
People participate in a Stop the Steal protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court in support of President Donald Trump in Washington on December 8.
People participate in a "Stop the Steal" protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court in support of President Donald Trump in Washington on December 8. Erin Scott/Reuters

The Supreme Court denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of Pennsylvania’s election results, delivering a near fatal blow to efforts by Republicans in their longshot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.
There were no noted dissents, and it marks the first vote of Justice Amy Coney Barrett in an election-related dispute.

The court acted quickly, just after the final brief in the court was filed, suggesting that the justices wanted to send a decisive message.

“Although we don’t know whether the vote was actually unanimous or why the court refused Rep. Kelly’s emergency request, the fact that the justices issued a one-sentence order with no separate opinions is a powerful sign that the court intends to stay out of election-related disputes, and that it’s going to leave things to the electoral process going forward,” said Steve Vladeck, a CNN legal analyst and University of Texas law school professor. “It’s hard to imagine a more quietly resounding rejection of these challenges from this court.”

The Supreme Court’s action is a crushing loss for President Trump who suggested as late as Tuesday that he thought the justices — including three of his nominees — might step in and take his side as he has continually and falsely suggested there was massive voter fraud during the election.

Rep. Mike Kelly had challenged the Commonwealth’s “no-excuse” absentee ballot law that was adopted in October 2019.

The effort faced steep odds at the Supreme Court, particularly because the dispute turned mostly on issues of state law. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the challenge last weekend holding that Kelly and others failed to file their challenge in a timely manner.

“It is beyond cavil that petitioners failed to act with due diligence” in presenting the case, the court held noting that they filed the suit more than one year after the enactment of the law at issue.

Tuesday also marked the “safe harbor” deadline for the state under federal law. That means that when Congress tallies the electoral votes in January, it must accept electoral results that were certified before the deadline.

The emergency petition was addressed to Justice Samuel Alito who has jurisdiction over the Pennsylvania courts. He referred it to the whole court.

Lawyers for Kelly argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violated his “right to petition and right to due process, guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, respectively, by closing all avenues of relief for past and future harms.”

But Pennsylvania officials called the petition “fundamentally frivolous.”
“No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor’s certification of presidential election results,” argued J. Bart Delone, the state’s chief deputy attorney general.

“The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting in this kind of judicial power would be incalculable,” he said.
 
后退
顶部