翻盘就在今晚!

你是真不相信大选作弊,还是就是单纯的讨厌川普?
我觉得他是第一项,只相信传统所谓大媒体
 
要翻了,川总一定赢:jiayou:
 
你是真不相信大选作弊,还是就是单纯的讨厌川普?

那州是共和党执政,选票已经点了三遍了吧?特朗普把州长、州务卿骂得狗血淋头,他们就赌气再点一遍。


1608263777265.png



1608263694766.png
 
最后编辑:
川普转了一个推,那个推有乔治亚州的两个人,戴的口罩是中国国旗图案,意思是中共的人

情报局的人已经有定论了:三股儿境外势力干涉大选

 


I caught them all!
 
快点翻,吃瓜众茶余饭后有看点,但现在老川像NBA落后30分只剩10秒。。。
 
老川一腚蝇
 

说个有意思的技术问题,为什么川大爷的法律团队从来不敢claim "voter fraud".​


来源: 奔驰野马 于 2020-12-21 10:23:42

朱律师甚至在法庭上被法官当众诘问:Do you claim voter fraud? 老市长擦了几遍脸上的黑色汗水,嘟囔着 说"No, Your Honor, I am claming vote irregularites".

f84d350f3523BhlUV8Dd.jpeg


死人投票,USB灌票,“中国制造“假票和半夜三更偷偷从桌子下拖出的黑箱子,哪个不比Texas的默罕默德先生冒领109张选票更严重呢。既然默先生在10月就被民主的铁拳打到局子里了,那干嘛到了11-12月朱律师还不敢以"voter fraud"的罪名起诉呢?

答案是一个很简单的法律技术问题:voter fraud 是刑事罪,vote irregularities 吵吵得再厉害,也是民事案子。起诉的程序和要求的证据水平完全不同。

1. 如果朱律把这些claims当刑事案件处理,那需要州检察官的配合和经过司法侦查才能提出控诉. 一旦检察官决定不起诉,朱律这案子也告不上去。
  • determine that the case should be charged and file a “complaint”
  • decide that the case should go to a grand jury, which will decide what charges, if any, to file, or.
  • decide not to pursue the case.
2. 最重要的是第二点,也就是民事案件对证据的要求,就是所谓的“burden of proof", 比刑事案件宽松多了,这给了朱市长/林律/豹纹一再拼凑证据滥诉的空子。

不同于刑法证据的严格要求,民法证据只要符合所谓的“preponderance standard“便可以告诉, 简单滴说,就是原告能够证明呈堂的证据有超过50%的概率成为事实,就可以保证案子不被踢出来。是不是比告刑事罪方便多了。

最后的结果我们也都看到了,就是这简单的“preponderance standard“, 川大爷团队也没办到啊。案子一个一个的被踢出来,川大爷也一次一次地从胜利走向胜利,就是本版的川粉,都给泡在冰冷的河水里了
嘻嘻


 

Sidney Powell Claims She's Being Blocked From Trump​

sidney powell speaks during a election fraud news conference

Lawyer Sidney Powell (Tom Williams/AP)

By Brian Trusdell | Tuesday, 22 December 2020 05:09 PM

Former U.S. attorney Sidney Powell, who has filed several lawsuits claiming fraud in the November election, says she has been barred access to President Donald Trump by senior White House officials since a meeting last week in which Trump suggested her as a special counsel to investigate voting irregularities.

"I haven't met or spoken with the president since Friday night," the Washington Examiner quoted Powell as saying. "The president knows this election was stolen, but he is not getting the support he, the Constitution, and the Republic deserve. His own people are misleading and undermining him while protecting their own careers and agendas."

The meeting in which Trump mentioned Powell, U.S. attorney for the western and northern districts of Texas and eastern district of Virginia from 1978 to 1988, included Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who was Powell's client until he was pardoned by Trump.

The New York Times, quoting an anonymous individual who was told about the meeting, said the gathering was "raucous" and "involved people shouting."
"My efforts to educate Rudy on demonstrable foreign interference in the election including multiple CISA and FBI findings have been met with irrational hostility," Powell told the Examiner. "I have been blocked by White House counsel and others from seeing or speaking to the president since I raised the public formal findings and even more evidence of the foreign interference from Iran and China in this election."

Many of Powell's lawsuits have alleged systemic issues with regard to software in election equipment manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems Corp. used in several battleground states.

 
后退
顶部