不要带任何政治立场,如果可以选择的话,你选哪一款疫苗?

选择疫苗

  • 灭活疫苗

    选票: 31 63.3%
  • mRNA疫苗

    选票: 16 32.7%
  • 腺病毒疫苗

    选票: 2 4.1%

  • 全部投票
    49

光放

我没有立场,只想追求真相与正义。我没有主张,只是要驳斥胡说八道。
注册
2016-03-28
消息
6,727
荣誉分数
2,087
声望点数
223
1、灭活疫苗
灭活疫苗是最传统的经典技术路线:即在体外培养新冠病毒,然后将其灭活,使之没有毒性,但这些病毒的“尸体”仍能刺激人体产生抗体,使免疫细胞记住病毒的模样。

2、核酸(mRNA)疫苗
核酸疫苗包括mRNA疫苗和DNA疫苗,是将编码S蛋白的基因,mRNA或者DNA直接注入人体,利用人体细胞在人体内合成S蛋白,刺激人体产生抗体。通俗的说,相当于把一份记录详细的病毒档案交给人体的免疫系统。

3、腺病毒载体疫苗
腺病毒载体疫苗是用经过改造后无害的腺病毒作为载体,装入新冠病毒的S蛋白基因,制成腺病毒载体疫苗,刺激人体产生抗体。S蛋白是新冠病毒入侵人体细胞的关键“钥匙”,无害的腺病毒戴上S蛋白的“帽子”,假装自己很“凶”,让人体产生免疫记忆。
 
最后编辑:
是将编码S蛋白的基因,mRNA或者DNA直接注入人体,利用人体细胞在人体内合成S蛋白,刺激人体产生抗体。


那些转基因食品都不敢吃的人, 敢用这个。
那真是无知无畏。
 
1、灭活疫苗
灭活疫苗是最传统的经典技术路线:即在体外培养新冠病毒,然后将其灭活,使之没有毒性,但这些病毒的“尸体”仍能刺激人体产生抗体,使免疫细胞记住病毒的模样。
2、腺病毒载体疫苗
腺病毒载体疫苗是用经过改造后无害的腺病毒作为载体,装入新冠病毒的S蛋白基因,制成腺病毒载体疫苗,刺激人体产生抗体。S蛋白是新冠病毒入侵人体细胞的关键“钥匙”,无害的腺病毒戴上S蛋白的“帽子”,假装自己很“凶”,让人体产生免疫记忆。
3、核酸疫苗
核酸疫苗包括mRNA疫苗和DNA疫苗,是将编码S蛋白的基因,mRNA或者DNA直接注入人体,利用人体细胞在人体内合成S蛋白,刺激人体产生抗体。通俗的说,相当于把一份记录详细的病毒档案交给人体的免疫系统。
建议修改一下2,3两段的顺序,match选项。
 
请再多科普一些内容,优缺点,有效性,有效期,副作用,价格,适用面...
 
一定是性价比最好的那一款! :tx:
 
灭活疫苗从理论上来说就像流感疫苗,对付不了新变异的病毒。所以,即使打了,还可能得新冠。核酸疫苗是比较理想的,只是太新,第一次大规模使用。我选核酸。
 
1 hr 34 min ago

Pfizer says it still doesn't know if someone can transmit Covid-19 after receiving vaccine​

From CNN’s Shelby Lin Erdman

It’s still unclear whether a person who receives Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine can still transmit the virus, company CEO Albert Bourla said Thursday.

“I think this is something that needs to be examined,” Bourla said in an interview with NBC News scheduled to air Thursday night. “We are not certain about that right now with what we know.”

Bourla also told host Lester Holt he believes vaccine trial participants who received a placebo rather that the actual shot should get the vaccine.

“It is a moral and ethical dilemma and obligation,” Bourla said. “I believe that in discussion with regulators, we should find a way, so sooner rather than later, give to all the placebo participants the vaccine.”

If that happens, it would mean unblinding the vaccine trial – something that could impact the longer term results, health experts have said.

Pfizer has asked the US Food and Drug Administration for emergency use authorization for its vaccine. The FDA’s advisers meet Dec. 10 to discuss the application.

But Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, told Holt there are still a lot of unanswered questions.

“We sort of have a million questions to make sure that we understand exactly what the safety issues are and exactly what the efficacy issues are,” Offit said. “Is it effective in people over 65? Is it equally effective among racial groups, ethnic groups? Is it effective in people who have various medical conditions?”

But there’s one question that he does have an answer for, Offit said.
“The standard we're going to hold this too is, would I give this vaccine to myself or my own family? And if the answer to that question is, ‘I'm not sure,’ then we're not going to move forward.”
 
给人感觉是那些所谓的新疫苗都有造假的数据,很不靠谱。还是先选个相对安全的灭活疫苗吧。
 
新冠病毒的变异显然比流感的小得多,
所以中国的疫苗在巴西和沙特等等很多国家都有效。
 
这种投票 居然盖牌。 说实话,特想知道谁想回国打灭活。说不定,能为你们祈福呢。
 
最后编辑:
这种投票 居然盖牌。 说实话,特想知道谁想回国打灭活。说不定,能为你们祈福呢。
楼主都说了,不用带立场,先跳出你那个圈,都是免费不要考虑其他,摆这几种疫苗在那,你会打哪种?我到目前为止,会选灭活疫苗,你会选哪种?
 
美国三位总统,外加拜登,他们打哪种,我就选哪种。
 
后退
顶部