给这么一搞， 卡屯的地主是不是都要找不到租客了？(一年两个月后更新）

[FlyingEagle]

https://stittsvillecentral.ca/1000-robert-grant-avenue-development-propos3al-cause-for-concern/

别忘了卡南还有600 套coming

下面的评论骂声一片 认为盖高楼 会使得 本来已经拥挤的街道 更加拥挤

盖高楼适合沿着轻轨 否则街道就得拓宽 不然上下班绝对堵车1小时以上

市政府没有足够的土地盖房子满足日益增长的人口需求

 

[当当娘]

ottawa享受宁静日子太久了 猛一下开发 居民各种难受

 

[Littlecesar]

https://stittsvillecentral.ca/1000-robert-grant-avenue-development-propos3al-cause-for-concern/

别忘了卡南还有600 套coming

好像link已经没有了六百套的信息

 

[Littlecesar]

ottawa享受宁静日子太久了 猛一下开发 居民各种难受

希望你是对的

 

[ert0000]

好像link已经没有了六百套的信息

Link 的url有个typo. 把proposal中的3去掉就是正确的link,600套基本正确。准确是566套。

供需关系已经逆转啦，买方或租客会成为大爷。

1000 Robert Grant Avenue development proposal cause for concern​

Lesley McKayOctober 8, 2019

The Lépine Corporation have submitted to the City a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 1000 Robert Grant Avenue for a proposed new development in the Fernbank Lands neighbourhood.
The 2009 Fernbank Community Design Plan allows for commercial use and apartments up to nine storeys in the existing zoning along Robert Grant. The neighbouring Livery Street allows buildings up to six storeys under the design plan.

This new development proposes three residential apartment buildings in height from 5 storeys to 15 storeys, with a two-level parking garage providing 615 parking spaces and a surface parking lot with six parking spaces. Also included in the underground parking are spaces for 283 bicycles. There would be a total of 566 one-bedroom and two-bedroom rental units. A one storey community clubhouse with a pool, gym, meeting rooms and social areas is proposed for the centre of the site.

The applicant is requesting high-rise apartments be permitted with a maximum height of 15 storeys (54 metres) for the portion of the site fronting on Robert Grant Avenue. For the portion of the site abutting the R4Z Zone on Livery Street, an increase in height from 15 and 20 metres to 21 metres is requested. For the remainder of the Livery Street frontage, the height limit is currently 30 metres and is not proposed to change.

The applicant is also requesting an increase in the minimum interior side yard setback from 0 metres to 7.5 metres on the south side of the property to provide a larger buffer between the development and the abutting property. The proposed amendment includes a request to reduce the minimum required resident parking rate from 1.2 spaces per dwelling unit to 1.0 space per dwelling unit and to reduce the minimum required visitor parking rate from 0.2 spaces per dwelling unit to 0.1 spaces per dwelling unit.
You can see additional documents related to this proposal here.

Councillor Gower has commented and is troubled by this proposal — “Lépine is asking for a considerable increase to the allowable height. I am concerned that the overloaded infrastructure in the area – roads and transit – cannot currently support this development. We’re seeing massive growth in the Fernbank area and adjacent communities, but transportation projects like Robert Grant Avenue are still lagging years behind”.
The Stittsville Village Association (SVA) “opposes the proposed amendment, which seeks a significant adjustment of allowable height along with reduced parking. The extension of Robert Grant to Hazeldean and eventually to Palladium is many years away under current council priorities, as is rapid transit. The infrastructure is simply not in place to support the kind of density this development will bring, as well as others if we allow this to become the new benchmark for building height in that neighbourhood”.
Councillor Gower strongly encourages residents to make their comments and concerns known by sending feedback to Kathy.Rygus@ottawa.ca, the Development Review Planner on this proposal, and he would like you to copy him – glen.gower@ottawa.ca.
Comments must be submitted by November 5th. From the feedback received, the developer will be asked by the City to make changes to address community concerns.
A public meeting will be held in November with the date and details to be confirmed.

 

[ASSISTANT]

这种类型的盖起来就冲那物业管理非费老中就不会买。名校是老中撑起的

 

[当当娘]

不管修多少套 来多少人 变化是个渐进的过程 不是一夜变天 学区也好 交通也好 人也就慢慢适应变化了 好多不利因素也是基于现在的设施来考虑 配套会逐渐跟上 有可能中间有几年不适应期 不影响整体是个方便成熟的社区 喜欢安静地区的人会选择离开 人口增长是事实 躲去哪里都避不开 考虑生活便利性是大多数人的首选 现有居民肯定回不到曾经的安静环境 但是对后来的居民来说 以前的环境对他们是空白 没有对比就没有伤害 既然还要来 说明综合比较是个好的选择

 

[小狗子]

不管修多少套 来多少人 变化是个渐进的过程 不是一夜变天 学区也好 交通也好 人也就慢慢适应变化了 好多不利因素也是基于现在的设施来考虑 配套会逐渐跟上 有可能中间有几年不适应期 不影响整体是个方便成熟的社区 喜欢安静地区的人会选择离开 人口增长是事实 躲去哪里都避不开 考虑生活便利性是大多数人的首选 现有居民肯定回不到曾经的安静环境 但是对后来的居民来说 以前的环境对他们是空白 没有对比就没有伤害 既然还要来 说明综合比较是个好的选择

后来的不是没对比 是没的选 曾经能住大House的水平 现在只能来和难民 廉租房人员一起住 加拿大这样的最蛋疼 不够富也不够穷

 

[多伦多carpool]

后来的不是没对比 是没的选 曾经能住大House的水平 现在只能来和难民 廉租房人员一起住 加拿大这样的最蛋疼 不够富也不够穷

难民廉租房人员不住郊区的。

 

[多伦多carpool]

我不是那个人。我只是各方面得意见都参考一下。我是各方面意见都听听，自己独立思考。该投不该投，投多少自己心里有数。要有独立思考得能力， 自己做决断。。

从你转这个帖子就知道你的intention了，你看跌。
其实你要真相信那人说的，不是买不买房的问题，是应该马上把你自住房卖了等crash。

 

[当当娘]

自己直接间接的生活环境没有接触难民廉租屋居民的 随便根据网上个案判断 凭空假想负面因素 有失偏颇 事实上了很多难民的教育水准和经济水准不比移民差

 

[ASSISTANT]

赶紧找个规划图看看地铁线。然后旁边买个到时候等动迁大赚。

 

[ASSISTANT]

难明有很多种。早期的南越人非常勤劳团结。银行贷不到自己的圈子可以帮忙。中期的东欧的斯拉夫难民见过战争知道珍惜，也不错。往外租的公寓可能为了缓解过长的list.或许拿subsidy的多些，倒不一定是移民。不过有往上加几层的可能。能多加一层开发商就赚一层。

 

[Littlecesar]

光靠学校不行，必须要靠就业。卡屯居民住宅建设速度太快，必须要有就业支撑。不知道各级政府有没有在卡屯扩展产业的计划，光靠原来的HiTech公司肯定无法扩张，北电倒下是一个致命打击。
但可以看出在过去的几年里（不到十年）已悄然形成一个军工企业角，就聚集在Costco那一块。估计与联邦省二级政府的政策有关。
下一步，看福特、Kinexas 能不能成点气候。Citigate那里搞了一个好大的building, 有人知道是哪家公司吗？

 

[#2~basket b boy]

希望谷歌，微软，脸书，亚马逊大的核心研发部门强势入住。。