- 注册
- 2005-12-07
- 消息
- 21,734
- 荣誉分数
- 5,834
- 声望点数
- 373
建议看看下面这篇19年轰动首都的极左记者发表的 ”RICH SCHOOL POOR SCHOOL“的报道吧。
这几个极左记者，把矛头指向几个RICH 的”富“小学（他们的统计就在小学层面）， 大谈机会不均等，有的很富，有的很穷。就是典型的偷换概念。 在公立学校的旗帜下，学校的经费基本上是按学生人头数量给的。 不会因为你这区的家庭收入高，或你这区的排名高就有”公立“资金的倾斜。这和中国有极大的不同。之所以有的学校富，是因为学校所在社区的家长的私人捐赠或贡献。。。。 把这扯进社会不公来批判是非常不合适的，文中还鼓吹”富裕“的学校把社会捐赠得来的给社区捐赠能力弱的学校分， 就类似当年中国文革那时的气氛。
谢天谢地，这些极左记者没有盯上中学，如果被盯上了，WEST CARLETON, LISGAR, NEPEAN HIGH, EOM, ALL SAINT, LDH 可能被抄家。
Rich school, poor school: Private money affects Ottawa's public education system
How private money affects the education of children in Ottawa's public school system
Rich school, poor school: Private money affects Ottawa's public education system
How private money affects the education of children in Ottawa's public school systemAuthor of the article:
Jacquie Miller
Publishing date:
Aug 08, 2019 • August 8, 2019 • 21 minute read
Article content
At Charles H. Hulse PS, the school council’s budget was $1,500 last year, collected from provincial government grants. That helped pay for a multicultural potluck supper, a family night so parents could see how their children learned math, and a hot-dog day. Many of the children at the school on Alta Vista Drive are newcomers — council meetings are translated into Arabic, Somali and Nepali — whose parents cannot afford to contribute money to the council.Across town at Broadview Public School in McKellar Park, the school council raised $127,043 in 2017-18, the latest year data is available. A dance-a-thon, silent auction, book sale and other fundraising events ensured the council could purchase everything from Chromebooks to yoga lessons for kindergarteners.
Four cannabis executives listed in annual report of Canada’s top-paid CEOs
Parents have always peddled pizza lunches and staged bake sales to raise a few dollars for their children’s school. But the amount of cash collected by elementary school councils at Ottawa’s largest public school board is substantial. Councils at elementary schools reported revenue totalling $3.94 million in 2017-18.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The privately-raised money is poured into “extras” like field trips and art workshops. But it also pays for what some might consider basics, from library books to science equipment and play structures.In neighbourhoods where parents can contribute and have the skills and contacts to more easily raise money, students reap the benefits. The fundraising slows to a trickle at schools in low-income neighbourhoods.
The discrepancy between schools is huge, an analysis by the Citizen shows.
The lowest revenue reported was at Arch Street Public School in southeast Ottawa, which took in $500.
Eight school councils reported $2,500 or less a year in revenue. Half of those schools, including Arch Street, don’t even have councils, but the schools received government grants that would normally be given to councils to foster parent participation and small projects.
On the other end of the spectrum, five school councils in Ottawa raised more than $100,000.
(See how individual schools ranked here)
A Citizen analysis of four years of statistics going back to 2013-14 shows similar trends, with annual revenue from school councils ranging from as little as $6.20 to as high as $154,522.
In order to examine how private money affects the public education landscape in Ottawa, the Citizen spent months collecting data on 113 elementary schools for the 2017-18 academic year, using statistics supplied by the school board, supplemented by interviews with school council members and minutes of council meetings. Because schools with higher enrollment can be expected to raise more, we also calculated the amount raised by each council per student. Broadview, for example, may have raised the most money, but it’s also the largest school in the board with just over 1,000 students. Rockcliffe Park Public School raised the most per student, at $290.62, while the lowest was again Arch Street, which reported revenue of $3.01 per student.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
It’s a snapshot of one year, and there are some anomalies in the data. Some councils reported unusually high revenue that year, for instance, because they received grants for a major project such as a new play structure or because of lunch programs that bring in a lot of revenue but have a much lower net profit.But the data give a broad indication of the disparity in fundraising — and reveal what critics describe as a tiered public education system, one which further reinforces the disparity that exists between children whose parents have varying levels of income and education.
And the gap in fundraising, critics say, also lets the province off the hook for funding education and forces principals and teachers at schools in less affluent neighbourhoods to spend time applying for government and private grants so their students can have a playground or take field trips.
“There’s an inequity that happens when schools in more affluent communities are able to fundraise, while schools in less affluent areas never could,” says Erica Braunovan, a trustee at the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board who co-hosted a 2017 meeting on the topic with former-trustee-turned-Capital-ward-Coun. Shawn Menard.
“It creates an inequity in the educational experience of students,” she says. “The educational experience should be the same across the province. We shouldn’t have some schools that have one Chromebook for every four students and one school that has Chromebooks for every second student.”
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The situation in Ottawa reflects a wider trend at schools across the province.
The 2019 report by the public-education advocacy group People for Education found that the top 10 per cent of fundraising elementary schools raised 33 times the amount raised by the bottom 10 per cent; the previous year it was 37 times as much. The group has been tracking fundraising at schools through an annual survey for two decades, and the amounts continue to climb at elementary schools. (The survey includes all types of fundraising, but in elementary schools most of the money is raised by school councils.)
The issue is key at a time when the provincial Conservative government is making spending cuts, including reducing the grants allotted to educate each pupil.
However, exactly how deep funding cuts will be in future budgets is unknown — and educators can only guess at how funding gaps created by private fundraising will grow in the coming years.
And this leads to a variety of pertinent questions around an issue that is both complicated and controversial.
What is the value of school council fundraising? Can or should it fill any gaps in government funding? And what can be done about the fundraising disparity between schools in rich and poor neighbourhoods?
Parents can’t be faulted for helping their children by volunteering for the school council, says Annie Kidder, the executive director for People for Education.
“It’s a great, amazing job that parents do on school councils, to make the school the best it can be and a big part of that appears to be fundraising,” she says.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“The thing about fundraising is that it is a very easy to understand way to be involved in your child’s school. It can be fun. Things like the spring fair, or whatever, are great community events.”However, Kidder says it becomes problematic when there is such a variance between schools that can raise virtually nothing and those that can raise $100,000 or in some cases as much as $200,000 a year.
“That is when we start to worry about the basic principle of public education, which is that every child is supposed to have a fairly equitable chance to succeed, and equitable access to a similar quality of education.”
At the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, the top 10 per cent of fundraising school councils raised 38 times as much as the bottom ten per cent in 2017-18, our analysis found.
At Rockcliffe Park Public School, in Ottawa’s toniest neighbourhood, the school council reported $120,026 in revenue in 2017-18. That is $290.62 for each student.
The money ensured all students at Rockcliffe Park enjoyed a trip to the Ottawa Children’s Festival; paid for $5,449 worth of books and reading resources for the library and classrooms; and provided a subsidy of nearly $10,000 for the graduation ceremony and trip to Montreal for Grade 6 students, among other things.
Rockcliffe Park’s council also spends money to help needier schools, including six $1,000 grants to schools for literacy programs.
The council’s largest fundraiser is a book fair that attracts people from across the city. The fair raised $50,000 that year.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Queen Elizabeth Public School is only four kilometres away on St. Laurent Boulevard, but it’s in another universe when it comes to fundraising.Queen Elizabeth’s council reported $1,875 in revenue in 2017-18. That is $5.99 per student. The council revenue included $1,500 in provincial government grants, according to minutes of council meetings that give a glimpse into activities that year. Parents sold baked goods at a movie night and raised $165. Council spent $226.04 to buy pizza for Meet the Teacher Night and lunch snacks for students. A charitable foundation subsidized a “Scientists in the School” event one evening.
At one meeting, the Queen Elizabeth council decided to spend $15 a month for three months to buy fruit for the school’s breakfast club, then “evaluate the success of this approach.”
Some parents from schools in wealthier areas who attended the 2017 meeting trustee Braunovan co-sponsored to discuss disparity in school council fundraising were surprised at the wide gap between schools, she says. The goal was to raise awareness of the issue among members of the public and candidates for school board trustee, Braunovan says.
Participant Larry Shamash says it worked.
“It opened my eyes to the inequities,” says Shamash, the current co-chair of the council at Elmdale Public School in the Hampton Park neighbourhood.
Elmdale council, which reported $104,169 in revenue in 2017-18, has a strong tradition of parental involvement, he says. “We have a lot of great parents who put so much time into the school.”
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Some of the fundraising disparity is due to momentum, with some schools having a strong history of fundraising, Shamash says.However, the “unfortunate truth” is that in richer neighbourhoods parents have more money and time to devote to school council, he says.
At the meeting he met council members from schools where “parents were struggling just to make the budget for paper, for photocopying … they were working two jobs, some of them had a day shift, they had a night shift, they were just unable to put the time in.”
The fundraising disparity is not healthy or fair, says Shamash. It raises wider issues.
“Surely the question is: why should school councils really be needed to raise money? Councils are there to help direct some of the education and the issues around the school, but suddenly they raise a little bit of cash and for whatever reason, funding from the ministry is not there, and all of a sudden it becomes a necessary part of the school. And I wonder whether that is really something that should be happening.”
Melissa Jennings, the current chair of the school council at York Street Public School, says the meeting made her realize “how far behind we were.”
“We are just trying to get a few people to a meeting and they have these big organizations with very engaged parents. They were planning a lot of extras, when we are just trying to get the minimum.”
At York Street, that means ensuring that students have food and warm clothes and “stay at some level near their peers in math,” she says.
最后编辑:
当当娘
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-11-01
- 消息
- 859
- 荣誉分数
- 273
- 声望点数
- 173
看了
没看出这篇文章极端的观点 多是引用数据来说明现状 你的这个文章正好更进一步证实了我的说法 小孩成长的价值观来自于原生家庭 宝塔山上有钱有人有智慧 不管去哪个学校 都是提高学校质素的有生力量建议看看下面这篇19年轰动首都的极左记者发表的 ”RICH SCHOOL POOR SCHOOL“的报道吧。
这几个极左记者，把矛头指向几个RICH 的”富“小学（他们的统计就在小学层面）， 大谈机会不均等，有的很富，有的很穷。就是典型的偷换概念。 在公立学校的旗帜下，学校的经费基本上是按学生人头数量给的。 不会因为你这区的家庭收入高，或你这区的排名高就有”公立“资金的倾斜。这和中国有极大的不同。之所以有的学校富，是因为学校所在社区的家长的私人捐赠或贡献。。。。 把这扯进社会不公来批判是非常不合适的，文中还鼓吹”富裕“的学校把社会捐赠得来的给社区捐赠能力弱的学校分， 就类似当年中国文革那时的气氛。
谢天谢地，这些极左记者没有盯上中学，如果被盯上了，WEST CARLETON, LISGAR, NEPEAN HIGH, EOM, LDH 可能被抄家。
Rich school, poor school: Private money affects Ottawa's public education system
How private money affects the education of children in Ottawa's public school systemottawacitizen.com
Rich school, poor school: Private money affects Ottawa's public education system
How private money affects the education of children in Ottawa's public school system
Author of the article:
Jacquie Miller
Publishing date:
Aug 08, 2019 • August 8, 2019 • 21 minute read
Rojan (L), Adam and Rasham (R) play with the legos at Charles H. Hulse Public School. PHOTO BY JEAN LEVAC /Postmedia News
Article content
At Charles H. Hulse PS, the school council’s budget was $1,500 last year, collected from provincial government grants. That helped pay for a multicultural potluck supper, a family night so parents could see how their children learned math, and a hot-dog day. Many of the children at the school on Alta Vista Drive are newcomers — council meetings are translated into Arabic, Somali and Nepali — whose parents cannot afford to contribute money to the council.
Across town at Broadview Public School in McKellar Park, the school council raised $127,043 in 2017-18, the latest year data is available. A dance-a-thon, silent auction, book sale and other fundraising events ensured the council could purchase everything from Chromebooks to yoga lessons for kindergarteners.
Four cannabis executives listed in annual report of Canada’s top-paid CEOs
Parents have always peddled pizza lunches and staged bake sales to raise a few dollars for their children’s school. But the amount of cash collected by elementary school councils at Ottawa’s largest public school board is substantial. Councils at elementary schools reported revenue totalling $3.94 million in 2017-18.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The privately-raised money is poured into “extras” like field trips and art workshops. But it also pays for what some might consider basics, from library books to science equipment and play structures.
In neighbourhoods where parents can contribute and have the skills and contacts to more easily raise money, students reap the benefits. The fundraising slows to a trickle at schools in low-income neighbourhoods.
The discrepancy between schools is huge, an analysis by the Citizen shows.
The lowest revenue reported was at Arch Street Public School in southeast Ottawa, which took in $500.
Eight school councils reported $2,500 or less a year in revenue. Half of those schools, including Arch Street, don’t even have councils, but the schools received government grants that would normally be given to councils to foster parent participation and small projects.
On the other end of the spectrum, five school councils in Ottawa raised more than $100,000.
(See how individual schools ranked here)
Akhile takes a look at many of the comic books available for sale at the 53rd annual Rockcliffe Park Book Fair. The popular event raised $50,000 for the school council last year. PHOTO BY MICHAEL ROBINSON /(Michael Robinson / Ottawa Citiz
A Citizen analysis of four years of statistics going back to 2013-14 shows similar trends, with annual revenue from school councils ranging from as little as $6.20 to as high as $154,522.
In order to examine how private money affects the public education landscape in Ottawa, the Citizen spent months collecting data on 113 elementary schools for the 2017-18 academic year, using statistics supplied by the school board, supplemented by interviews with school council members and minutes of council meetings. Because schools with higher enrollment can be expected to raise more, we also calculated the amount raised by each council per student. Broadview, for example, may have raised the most money, but it’s also the largest school in the board with just over 1,000 students. Rockcliffe Park Public School raised the most per student, at $290.62, while the lowest was again Arch Street, which reported revenue of $3.01 per student.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
It’s a snapshot of one year, and there are some anomalies in the data. Some councils reported unusually high revenue that year, for instance, because they received grants for a major project such as a new play structure or because of lunch programs that bring in a lot of revenue but have a much lower net profit.
But the data give a broad indication of the disparity in fundraising — and reveal what critics describe as a tiered public education system, one which further reinforces the disparity that exists between children whose parents have varying levels of income and education.
And the gap in fundraising, critics say, also lets the province off the hook for funding education and forces principals and teachers at schools in less affluent neighbourhoods to spend time applying for government and private grants so their students can have a playground or take field trips.
“There’s an inequity that happens when schools in more affluent communities are able to fundraise, while schools in less affluent areas never could,” says Erica Braunovan, a trustee at the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board who co-hosted a 2017 meeting on the topic with former-trustee-turned-Capital-ward-Coun. Shawn Menard.
“It creates an inequity in the educational experience of students,” she says. “The educational experience should be the same across the province. We shouldn’t have some schools that have one Chromebook for every four students and one school that has Chromebooks for every second student.”
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Principal Irene Cameron at the kindergarten playground at Carson Grove. PHOTO BY TONY CALDWELL /Postmedia
The situation in Ottawa reflects a wider trend at schools across the province.
The 2019 report by the public-education advocacy group People for Education found that the top 10 per cent of fundraising elementary schools raised 33 times the amount raised by the bottom 10 per cent; the previous year it was 37 times as much. The group has been tracking fundraising at schools through an annual survey for two decades, and the amounts continue to climb at elementary schools. (The survey includes all types of fundraising, but in elementary schools most of the money is raised by school councils.)
The issue is key at a time when the provincial Conservative government is making spending cuts, including reducing the grants allotted to educate each pupil.
However, exactly how deep funding cuts will be in future budgets is unknown — and educators can only guess at how funding gaps created by private fundraising will grow in the coming years.
And this leads to a variety of pertinent questions around an issue that is both complicated and controversial.
What is the value of school council fundraising? Can or should it fill any gaps in government funding? And what can be done about the fundraising disparity between schools in rich and poor neighbourhoods?
Parents can’t be faulted for helping their children by volunteering for the school council, says Annie Kidder, the executive director for People for Education.
“It’s a great, amazing job that parents do on school councils, to make the school the best it can be and a big part of that appears to be fundraising,” she says.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“The thing about fundraising is that it is a very easy to understand way to be involved in your child’s school. It can be fun. Things like the spring fair, or whatever, are great community events.”
However, Kidder says it becomes problematic when there is such a variance between schools that can raise virtually nothing and those that can raise $100,000 or in some cases as much as $200,000 a year.
“That is when we start to worry about the basic principle of public education, which is that every child is supposed to have a fairly equitable chance to succeed, and equitable access to a similar quality of education.”
At the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, the top 10 per cent of fundraising school councils raised 38 times as much as the bottom ten per cent in 2017-18, our analysis found.
At Rockcliffe Park Public School, in Ottawa’s toniest neighbourhood, the school council reported $120,026 in revenue in 2017-18. That is $290.62 for each student.
The money ensured all students at Rockcliffe Park enjoyed a trip to the Ottawa Children’s Festival; paid for $5,449 worth of books and reading resources for the library and classrooms; and provided a subsidy of nearly $10,000 for the graduation ceremony and trip to Montreal for Grade 6 students, among other things.
Rockcliffe Park’s council also spends money to help needier schools, including six $1,000 grants to schools for literacy programs.
The council’s largest fundraiser is a book fair that attracts people from across the city. The fair raised $50,000 that year.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Queen Elizabeth Public School is only four kilometres away on St. Laurent Boulevard, but it’s in another universe when it comes to fundraising.
Queen Elizabeth’s council reported $1,875 in revenue in 2017-18. That is $5.99 per student. The council revenue included $1,500 in provincial government grants, according to minutes of council meetings that give a glimpse into activities that year. Parents sold baked goods at a movie night and raised $165. Council spent $226.04 to buy pizza for Meet the Teacher Night and lunch snacks for students. A charitable foundation subsidized a “Scientists in the School” event one evening.
At one meeting, the Queen Elizabeth council decided to spend $15 a month for three months to buy fruit for the school’s breakfast club, then “evaluate the success of this approach.”
Some parents from schools in wealthier areas who attended the 2017 meeting trustee Braunovan co-sponsored to discuss disparity in school council fundraising were surprised at the wide gap between schools, she says. The goal was to raise awareness of the issue among members of the public and candidates for school board trustee, Braunovan says.
Participant Larry Shamash says it worked.
“It opened my eyes to the inequities,” says Shamash, the current co-chair of the council at Elmdale Public School in the Hampton Park neighbourhood.
Elmdale council, which reported $104,169 in revenue in 2017-18, has a strong tradition of parental involvement, he says. “We have a lot of great parents who put so much time into the school.”
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Some of the fundraising disparity is due to momentum, with some schools having a strong history of fundraising, Shamash says.
However, the “unfortunate truth” is that in richer neighbourhoods parents have more money and time to devote to school council, he says.
At the meeting he met council members from schools where “parents were struggling just to make the budget for paper, for photocopying … they were working two jobs, some of them had a day shift, they had a night shift, they were just unable to put the time in.”
The fundraising disparity is not healthy or fair, says Shamash. It raises wider issues.
“Surely the question is: why should school councils really be needed to raise money? Councils are there to help direct some of the education and the issues around the school, but suddenly they raise a little bit of cash and for whatever reason, funding from the ministry is not there, and all of a sudden it becomes a necessary part of the school. And I wonder whether that is really something that should be happening.”
Melissa Jennings, the current chair of the school council at York Street Public School, says the meeting made her realize “how far behind we were.”
“We are just trying to get a few people to a meeting and they have these big organizations with very engaged parents. They were planning a lot of extras, when we are just trying to get the minimum.”
At York Street, that means ensuring that students have food and warm clothes and “stay at some level near their peers in math,” she says.
FlyingEagle
知名会员
- 注册
- 2007-01-12
- 消息
- 815
- 荣誉分数
- 414
- 声望点数
- 173
有可能是richcraft 不过那块地大部分是Urbandale 可能有很小部分给richcraft
Urbandale的土地从那里一直往北到Hazeldean 以后Urbandale会陆续向北盖房一直到Hazeldean
现在那里没新的release 是因为Urbandale太多的房子还未盖完
比如 Urbandale在RSS的某独立屋预计2020年1月交房 一直延期到2021年1月后 继续延期到2021年4月
由于疫情缘故 建筑商可以无限期延期 而不必受延期8个月就得赔买家钱的限制
随着国防部从东边搬到西边 不少就业机会也西迁到卡北和卡南
高速路以南 Terry Fox以西 逐渐建立起军工企业科技园
冰球队主场已计划搬到市区
Costco对面也盖了不少办公楼 都是市政规划
前加拿大首富命名的街道在卡南 不在卡北
原来Blackstone那里是工业园用地 北电倒闭 重创北方硅谷
工业园用地改为住宅用地
整个Kanata截至2019年底 540家高科技企业共雇佣2万3千名员工 2020底的数据2021年夏天才会公布
北电高峰期在本市就雇佣2万3千名员工
本市2019年人口1百万 计划至2036年 3期轻轨建成 人口增至120万 每年新建住宅4000-5000套 包括公寓
新增20万人口就得新增就业机会 估计需要共5万左右新的工作机会 才能吸引新移民常住
卡北和卡南预计贡献不少新的工作机会
卡南Hazeldean以北工业园
卡南Hazeldean以南住宅区
卡北 高科技工业园的老大 就是增加工作机会的引擎
未来20年 卡北增加工作机会最多 新盖的房子也会最多
用首富名字命名街道，也能让房产增值？
下联：有钱这都不是事儿，没钱这都是事儿他说什么，你该买还是买，该不买还是不买
FlyingEagle
知名会员
- 注册
- 2007-01-12
- 消息
- 815
- 荣誉分数
- 414
- 声望点数
- 173
房产增值受多个因数影响， 就业机会，学区房，利率，新增人口 等等
就业机会应该是最重要的因数
我尝试从就业机会的角度 来 回答 为什么卡南 (kanata 南) 房价比巴屯 (barrhaven) 贵？
我说这位加拿大前首富和热老师说的加拿大前首富是同一位富豪
热老师从学区房的角度来探讨EOM对卡北房价的巨大影响 他说这位加拿大前首富的儿子也是EOM毕业的
这位加拿大前首富高瞻远嘱 70年代移民加拿大时候 做了2件惊天动地的事
购买卡北大片土地盖工业园 创建2大电讯公司 Mitel 和 Newbridge Networks
他在北电高峰时间 将Newbridge Networks高价卖给Alcatel 一举登上加拿大首富宝座
很快他就将眼光放向卡南， 计划在卡南将高科技产业发扬光大， 在卡南 高压线附近 Terry Fox 以东的地方盖工业园 并用他的名字命名街道
可惜 北电却突然走下坡路 直至倒闭 打乱加拿大前首富的商业计划 整个北方硅谷高科技企业遭到重创
能够支撑我市高房价的2个主要因数 高科技企业和政府工
北方硅谷 = 北电 + 卡北高科技企业教父 （加拿大前首富） 美洲足球在欧洲的影响力 = 巴西队(包括贝利在内的巨星) + 马拉多纳
每年夏天安省在多伦多举办的高科技展会， 卡北高科技企业教父 （加拿大前首富）都是首席嘉宾 做首席演讲， 体现加拿大前首富对安省高科技企业发展说一不二的影响力
北电倒闭对本市高科技企业打击很大 间接导致高压线附近Terry Fox 以西的工业园在2015年被转作住宅用途 那里最近卖掉的2个TH分别加价 60+14=74万 （引领卡南新年房价大涨的74万网红TH）和 52+18=70万卖掉
如果北电没倒闭 卡南Hazeldean以南和Terry Fox 以西工业园区会将北方硅谷推向一个新高度 而不是改作住宅区
不过 国防部西迁 将服务国防部的企业陆续迁入卡北和卡南
卡南的未来房价， 受卡南Hazeldean以北和Terry Fox 以西的工业园影响较大， 主要是就近上班的优势
多伦多carpool
高级会员
- 注册
- 2014-09-12
- 消息
- 1,257
- 荣誉分数
- 487
- 声望点数
- 93
多伦多carpool
高级会员
- 注册
- 2014-09-12
- 消息
- 1,257
- 荣誉分数
- 487
- 声望点数
- 93
当然有用，这么多移民，过来的时候都是赤手空拳的，过了20年，有车有房有投资，大部分人都是靠读书拿到文凭才找到工作的。
