观察Omicron发展趋势,Omicron引起的死亡人数在渥太华,安省,加拿大和美国都已经超过Delta。

美国德州确认第一例50多岁的男子为Omicron相关的死亡。未透露疫苗接种等具体细节。

截止的12月18日,美国现在73%的新增病例为Omicron,Delta 26.6%,上周,12月12日,Omicron 12.6%, Delta 87%.

11 min ago

Texas confirms first known Omicron-related death in the United States​

From CNN’s Katherine Dillinger

A Harris County, Texas, man’s death is related to the Omicron variant of the coronavirus, County Judge Lina Hidalgo announced Monday.
This is the first known confirmed Omicron-related death in the United States.

The judge said the man was in his 50s but did not disclose any further details, such as his vaccination status.

Omicron caused more than 73% of new coronavirus cases in the US last week, becoming the dominant strain over Delta, according to CDC data. Some research has shown that it may case milder forms of Covid-19 than other variants, but research is still ongoing. Experts say that vaccination and booster shots continue to be the best way to lower the risk of severe illness or death

“Of course, we’re going to have hospitalizations, tragically deaths, like what we’ve seen now, but the evidence shows that for those vaccinated, in with the booster, is much less likely that they’re going to end up in the hospital,” Hidalgo said.

1 hr 29 min ago

Omicron responsible for more than 73% of new US cases, CDC data shows​

From CNN’s Michael Nedelman

The Omicron variant causes over 73% of new coronavirus cases in the US, according to estimates posted Monday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The week ending Dec. 18, Omicron accounted for 73.2% of cases, with delta making up an additional 26.6%.

The week prior, ending Dec. 11, Omicron was estimated at 12.6% of circulating virus, versus Delta’s 87%. Previously, the CDC estimated Omicron accounted for about 3% that week.

The week ending Dec. 4, Omicron caused less than 1% of new cases.

Omicron is even more prevalent in certain parts of the country — making up over 95% of circulating virus in parts of the northwest and southeast.

美国德州确认第一例50多岁的男子为Omicron相关的死亡。

此人未接种过疫苗,但是已经感染过Covid。

28 min ago

First Omicron-related death in US was an unvaccinated person​

From CNN's Dave Alsup

A man in Texas, whose death was related to the Omicron coronavirus variant, was unvaccinated and had previously been infected with Covid-19, according to a release from Harris County Public Health.

"The individual was at higher risk of severe complications from Covid-19 due to his unvaccinated status and had underlying health conditions," the release said.

The case is the first known confirmed Omicron-related death in the United States.

County Judge Lina Hidalgo announced the death on Monday, saying the man was in his 50s.
 
Moderna针对Omicron的疫苗加强针明年早期开始临床试验。

现在Moerna50微克半计量加强针比两针的抗体浓度增加37倍,100微克全计量加强针抗体浓度增加83倍。

11 hr 34 min ago

Moderna's Omicron-specific booster could start clinical trials early next year​

From CNN's Jacqueline Howard

A pharmacist prepares a syringe with a dose of Moderna vaccine during a vaccination campaign at the headquarters of the Rhineland-Palatinate Hotel and Restaurant Association (Dehoga), on 20 December 2021, Rhineland-Palatinate, Bad Kreuznach, Germany
A pharmacist prepares a syringe with a dose of Moderna vaccine during a vaccination campaign at the headquarters of the Rhineland-Palatinate Hotel and Restaurant Association (Dehoga), on 20 December 2021, Rhineland-Palatinate, Bad Kreuznach, Germany (Frank Rumpenhorst/picture alliance/Getty Images)

Biotechnology company Moderna continues to work on developing Covid-19 boosters that specifically target certain variants, including Delta and Omicron, Dr. Stephen Hoge, president of the company, said Monday.

"We're going to continue to advance an Omicron-specific booster into clinical trials in early 2022," Hoge said during a company conference call.

For now, Moderna plans to focus its "immediate efforts" around Omicron on advancing the current vaccine that is already available, Hoge said.

Moderna's current coronavirus vaccine booster is authorized for emergency use in the United States and administered as a half-dose at 50 micrograms.

Moderna announced Monday that preliminary data suggests its half-dose booster shot increased antibody levels 37-fold against Omicron compared with the levels seen when a fully vaccinated person does not receive a booster – but a larger-sized dose of the booster, at 100 micrograms, increases antibody levels 83-fold.
 
Moderna针对Omicron的疫苗加强针明年早期开始临床试验。

现在Moerna50微克半计量加强针比两针的抗体浓度增加37倍,100微克全计量加强针抗体浓度增加83倍。

11 hr 34 min ago

Moderna's Omicron-specific booster could start clinical trials early next year​

From CNN's Jacqueline Howard

A pharmacist prepares a syringe with a dose of Moderna vaccine during a vaccination campaign at the headquarters of the Rhineland-Palatinate Hotel and Restaurant Association (Dehoga), on 20 December 2021, Rhineland-Palatinate, Bad Kreuznach, Germany
A pharmacist prepares a syringe with a dose of Moderna vaccine during a vaccination campaign at the headquarters of the Rhineland-Palatinate Hotel and Restaurant Association (Dehoga), on 20 December 2021, Rhineland-Palatinate, Bad Kreuznach, Germany (Frank Rumpenhorst/picture alliance/Getty Images)

Biotechnology company Moderna continues to work on developing Covid-19 boosters that specifically target certain variants, including Delta and Omicron, Dr. Stephen Hoge, president of the company, said Monday.

"We're going to continue to advance an Omicron-specific booster into clinical trials in early 2022," Hoge said during a company conference call.

For now, Moderna plans to focus its "immediate efforts" around Omicron on advancing the current vaccine that is already available, Hoge said.

Moderna's current coronavirus vaccine booster is authorized for emergency use in the United States and administered as a half-dose at 50 micrograms.

Moderna announced Monday that preliminary data suggests its half-dose booster shot increased antibody levels 37-fold against Omicron compared with the levels seen when a fully vaccinated person does not receive a booster – but a larger-sized dose of the booster, at 100 micrograms, increases antibody levels 83-fold.

股市反映负面,Moderna 可能做无用功, 最后瞎忙一场。
omicron 这么快的传播速度,一两个月就过峰回落了。
 
最后编辑:
渥太华确诊Omicron 50例,疑似533 例。

1640125071274.png

1640125125350.png
 
初步研究表明,Omicron 比Delta 住院率少80%,都是一旦住院,两者的严重程度没有多大区别。

Omicron 比 Delta 反复感染的机会高10倍。

6 hr 56 min ago

Here's what early studies say about how Omicron compares to Delta​

From CNN's Jacqueline Howard

Two new preprint papers add to growing evidence that the Omicron coronavirus variant may be less likely to cause severe disease and hospitalization compared to the Delta variant.

Omicron is associated with a two-thirds reduction in the risk of Covid-19 hospitalization compared with Delta, suggests one study, released online Wednesday as a working paper by researchers at the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. That research was based out of Scotland.

The other paper, posted Tuesday to the online server medrxiv.org, suggests that people with Omicron infections have had 80% lower odds of being admitted to the hospital compared with Delta infections. But once a patient was hospitalized, there was no difference in the risk of severe disease, according to that research, based out of South Africa.

Both studies include preliminary data and have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The study out of Scotland included data on 23,840 Omicron cases and 126,511 Delta cases, from Nov. 1 to Dec. 19. The researchers – from the University of Edinburgh, University of Strathclyde and Public Health Scotland – took a close look at the health outcomes among those Omicron infections compared with Delta infections. There were 15 hospital admissions among those with Omicron infections and 856 hospital admissions among Delta.

"Although small in number, the study is good news. The two thirds reduction in hospitalisation of double vaccinated young people compared to Delta indicates that Omicron will be milder for more people," James Naismith, director of the Rosalind Franklin Institute and professor of structural biology at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in either study, said in a written statement distributed by the UK-based Science Media Centre on Wednesday.

The researchers found that the proportion of Omicron cases that were likely reinfections in people who have had Covid-19 before was more than 10 times that of Delta. The data also showe
 

伦敦帝国理工关于Omicron再感染的文章,自然免疫对Omicron防再感染的有效率为19%。​


来源: solo1 于 2021-12-28 17:35:52

还有,没有证据表明Omicron的严重程度低于Delta。

还需要更多的数据。

To put this into context, in the pre-Omicron era, the UK “SIREN” study of COVID infection in healthcare workers estimated that prior infection afforded 85% protection against a second COVID infection over 6 months. The reinfection risk estimated in the current study suggests this protection has fallen to 19% (95%CI: 0-27%) against an Omicron infection.

The study finds no evidence of Omicron having lower severity than Delta, judged by either the proportion of people testing positive who report symptoms, or by the proportion of cases seeking hospital care after infection. However, hospitalisation data remains very limited at this time.

原文链接:Omicron largely evades immunity from past infection or two vaccine doses | Imperial News | Imperial College London

 

伦敦帝国理工关于Omicron再感染的文章,自然免疫对Omicron防再感染的有效率为19%。​


来源: solo1 于 2021-12-28 17:35:52

还有,没有证据表明Omicron的严重程度低于Delta。

还需要更多的数据。

To put this into context, in the pre-Omicron era, the UK “SIREN” study of COVID infection in healthcare workers estimated that prior infection afforded 85% protection against a second COVID infection over 6 months. The reinfection risk estimated in the current study suggests this protection has fallen to 19% (95%CI: 0-27%) against an Omicron infection.

The study finds no evidence of Omicron having lower severity than Delta, judged by either the proportion of people testing positive who report symptoms, or by the proportion of cases seeking hospital care after infection. However, hospitalisation data remains very limited at this time.

原文链接:Omicron largely evades immunity from past infection or two vaccine doses | Imperial News | Imperial College London


伦敦帝国理工的文章是11天以前。现在再说"再没有证据表明Omicron的严重程度低于Delta",没啥道理了。
 
最后编辑:
应该是,所有证据都表明,omicron致病性低于delta. 南非,英国,美国,加拿大,omicron感染都爆炸性增长,死亡人数几乎都不变,死亡率都下降了好多。
 

奥密克戎数据出来了+美国医院现状​

Original 阿司匹林42195 阿司匹林42195米 2022-01-02 12:48

一直盼望的奥密克戎数据终于在2021年的最后一天出来了。

(当我们讨论疫苗和病毒时,需要具体看是什么时候做的研究、针对哪种突变株、当地的疫情如何、以及打的哪种疫苗。)

这是英国公共卫生部12/31/2021的最新分析,收录了11/27-12/24的17万德尔塔病例和20万奥密克戎病例。英国用了三种疫苗:阿斯利康、辉瑞、莫德纳,其中加强针多为mRNA疫苗。

Image


这个分析回答了我们最想知道的两个问题。

1,奥密克戎在现实中的毒性(致病力,virulence)到底是不是比德尔塔更轻?

答案:是的。英国奥密克戎病人的住院率是同时期德尔塔病人的约三分之一

这个是真实世界的观察,是来自一个大多数人已经接种疫苗地区的数据,可能主要反映了疫苗的作用。

(这个数字不是指奥密克戎的内在毒性,科学家目前认为奥密克戎本身的致病性可能比德尔塔轻一些,但比以前的其它变异株都要重一些。)

这是一个好消息。

不过也要认识到奥密克戎突破了免疫屏障,使得许多本来不会染上新冠的人破防。这并不意味着奥密克戎不引起严重的疾病,只是引起重病的风险要小不少,但是因为感染的人太多了,对整个社会的破坏更大。

2,我们知道打了三针疫苗也会被奥密克戎感染,但疫苗对重症/住院的保护怎么样?

两针疫苗6个月后,对住院的保护是52%,这就是说你和没打疫苗的邻居比,你住院的风险是他的1/2。

打了加强针两周后,对住院的保护率是88%,也就是说你住院的风险降到了邻居的1/9。

对于打不打加强针,一位传染病医生说得特别好:

2021年末,美国人民处在最大的无奈中。堤坝已决,病毒大洪水已至。淹没不同的地区只在时间的问题。打不打疫苗,打几针疫苗的问题,其实就是每个老百姓在洪水之中身上套几个游泳圈自救的问题。

“活着”就好。


我们医院已经焦头烂额了,现在急诊病人和新冠住院人数都是疫情以来最多的,而且还在上升。同时最近收住院的病人有十分之一需要进ICU(重症监护病房)。

国民警卫队已经进驻48个州帮忙,我们医院也来了三位数的国民警卫队队员帮着干活。

那天我在路上碰到医院中心实验室的玛丽,聊了一会儿。

玛丽对美国的现状极度失望,她告诉我一件真事。她的丈夫以前是救火队员,他的一位老朋友是川普支持者,不肯打疫苗,得了新冠,在呼吸机上挣扎很久后12/27那天终于被拔了管宣布死亡。死者的太太打来电话,咨询她是否应该接种疫苗。玛丽的丈夫说当然要打,对方犹犹豫豫地说,可是这违背了我们的原则。其实川普鼓励大家接种,不过最近他刚透露自己也打了加强针,就被一部分粉丝嘲笑了,这些人太执着了。

玛丽后来带我去新冠检测中心转了一圈。我原来以为医院只用一种核酸测试方法,而事实是多种机器各种方法一起上阵,有个3M牌PCR机器长得很像日本电饭锅。需要测试的样品源源不断地送来,工作人员任务太重,医院其他不少实验室也帮忙一起检测新冠。以前他们把20%的样品送去做测序,最近不送了,忙不过来。

Image


我们医院现在测试的阳性率高达50%。目前社区里新冠流行程度很高,如果哪位朋友出现了感冒或者发烧的症状,先要假设就是新冠,马上隔离病人,再考虑做抗原检测。

医院里人手不足,不少商店也是,比如星巴克、沃尔玛都时有关门。对CDC阳性病人五天隔离五天口罩的新政策,美国传染病协会非常支持,但很多群众不满,认为太不安全了。

我们科里上次告诉我她得新冠的住院医就在这个新政策下,已经被招回来回来上班了。

其实现状是现在几乎全民感染,大众对十天隔离的依从性很低,每个人都躲在家里十天也不现实,很多关键部门比如医院无法运作。CDC缩短了隔离时间,既有科学上的分析,也是是流行病学家和社会强烈呼吁的,是一个不完美的但可能必须的做法。

不定因素很多时,各人有不同的看法很正常。疫情以来注意到的一点是,每个人由于自己出发点不同,观点可能相差很大,而这些观点都没错。比如有个群里,科学家都在谴责CDC政策不严谨,只有一位医生说,不缩短时间,医疗系统没法维持,我们诊所一天好几个护士医生病了,现在只剩一个医生了。

我想起来以前《时代》杂志上有个得了前列腺癌的医生写过一篇文章,讨论要不要做前列腺切除手术,他问:你是要活着但失去了性功能、还是保留了性功能但死了?

美国现在处于一个最难的时期,感染的人数像爆竹那样炸开,而唯一对奥密克戎有效的抗体药Sotrovimab 供应量远远不足,使用方便效果好的口服药Paxlovid 又还没有运来。

但是熬过这段黑暗,口服药供应跟上,大批人通过轻微的感染产生免疫,就可能看到黎明的曙光。

乍暖还寒时,最难将息。

更多:
1,“新冠持续230天”的真相是什么?
2,有Delmicron这种新病毒株吗?Flurona呢?

 

SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses from vaccines or infection remain robust against Omicron​

By Colin Lightfoot, M.Sc. Infection and ImmunityJan 3 2022Reviewed by Aimee Molineux

Multiple Spike (S) protein mutations in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) Omicron variant contribute to the virus's escape from neutralizing antibody responses, lowering vaccination protection against infection. It's unclear to what extent other adaptive response components, such as T cells, may still target Omicron and contribute to protection against catastrophic outcomes. T cells' ability to respond to Omicron spike was tested in participants who had been vaccinated with Ad26.CoV2.S or BNT162b2, as well as in unvaccinated convalescent COVID-19 patients.

In a new study, a team of researchers from multi-national institutions discovered that 70-80% of CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to spike were consistent across research groups. Moreover, although having far more mutations, the magnitude of Omicron cross-reactive T cells was comparable to that of the Beta and Delta variants. In addition, T cell responses to ancestral spike, nucleocapsid, and membrane proteins in Omicron-infected hospitalized patients were equivalent to those seen in individuals hospitalized in earlier waves dominated by the ancestral, Beta, or Delta variations.

According to these findings, despite Omicron's widespread mutations and lower susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies, the bulk of T cell responses elicited by vaccination or spontaneous infection cross-recognize the variation. Early clinical observations from South Africa suggest that well-preserved T cell immunity to Omicron may contribute to protection from severe COVID-19.

A preprint version of this study, which is yet to undergo peer review, is available on the medRxiv* server.

Study: SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses induced upon vaccination or infection remain robust against Omicron. Image Credit: Fusebulb / Shutterstock
Study: SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses induced upon vaccination or infection remain robust against Omicron. Image Credit: Fusebulb / Shutterstock

The study​

T cell responses were studied in people who had received one or two doses of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Johnson and Johnson/Janssen, n = 20 per group), two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech, n = 15), or had recovered from infection. Convalescent donors were investigated after a median of 1.4 months of moderate or asymptomatic illness. T cell responses to vaccination were assessed 22-32 days after the final dose in more than 85% of vaccinees. Immunization and infection both produced spike-specific CD4 T cell responses, while a CD8 response was found less frequently. Intracellular cytokine labeling was used to evaluate cytokine production in response to peptide pools that covered the entire Wuhan-1 spike protein and the Omicron spike.

ImageForNews_700660_16412715538024828.jpg


T cell response to the ancestral and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 spike after vaccination and in unvaccinated COVID-19 convalescent patients. a, Clinical characteristics of the study groups. *: data regarding time post-Covid-19 infection were available for only 6 out of the 13 participants who received one dose of Ad26.COV2.S. b, Proportion of participants exhibiting an ancestral spike-specific CD4 T cell response after vaccination with one or two doses of Ad26.COV2.S or two doses of BNT162b2. c, Profile of the ancestral spike-specific T cell response in vaccinees and convalescent individuals. d, Representative examples of IFN-γ production in response to ancestral and Omicron spike in two individuals who received two doses of Ad26.COV2.S. e,g, Frequency of spike-specific CD4 (e) and CD8 T cells (g) producing any of the measured cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2 or TNF-α) in response to ancestral and Omicron spike peptide pools. Bars represent the median of responders. Differences between SARS-CoV-2 variants were calculated using a Wilcoxon paired t-test. f, h, Fold change in the frequency of spike-specific CD4 (f) and CD8 T cells (h) between ancestral and Omicron spike responses. Bars represent medians. No significant differences were observed between groups using a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test. The number of participants included in each analysis is indicated on the graphs.

Related Stories​

In all groups studied, CD4 T cell frequencies to Omicron spike were consistently and considerably lower than the ancestral spike. This resulted in a median drop of 14-30% in CD4 responsiveness to Omicron, as evidenced by foldchange. In the case of the CD8 T cell response, vaccinees who had received two doses of Ad26.COV2.S and convalescent donors showed a significant reduction in the magnitude of Omicron spike-specific CD8 T cells, whereas the other groups did not. When compared to the ancestral virus, the CD8 response to Omicron was reduced by 17-25 %. A small percentage of responders showed a loss of CD8 T cell recognition of Omicron, which is likely due to mutations in specific CD8 epitopes affecting specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules.

T cell affinity can be reduced by mutations in variant epitopes, which can impact a cell's functional capacity. As a result, the authors evaluated the polyfunctional profiles of T cells in vaccinees and convalescent patients and found that both ancestral and Omicron-specific T cells have a similar capacity for cytokine co-expression across all groups. There were no variations in the polyfunctional profiles of CD4 or CD8 T cells between ancestral and Omicron spike, indicating that there was no functional impairment in cross-reactive Omicron T cell responses. By examining spike peptide pools matching the viral sequences of the Beta and Delta strains, the authors were able to compare Omicron spike responses to other variants of concern in Ad26.CoV2.S vaccinees.
With the exception of a higher drop in the Omicron CD4 response compared to Beta in recipients of two doses of Ad26.COV2.S, there were no significant variations in cross-reactive CD4 and CD8 T cell responses between Beta, Delta, and Omicron. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was linked to a larger frequency of spike-specific T lymphocytes in vaccinees but did not affect Omicron cross-reactivity. These findings reveal that Omicron spike CD4 and CD8 T cell recognition is mostly retained relative to the ancestral strain and comparable to other relevant variants with three times fewer mutations.

Implications​

Overall, these findings show that vaccination and infection elicit a robust CD4 and CD8 T cell response that predominantly cross-reacts with Omicron, consistent with recent research on T cell escape by Beta, Delta, and other variants. Despite significant neutralization escape against Omicron, the T cell response is retained in 70-80% of cases. Because Omicron's mutations have a limited influence on the T cell response, immunization or prior infection may still give significant protection against severe disease.

In fact, compared to the last Delta wave, South Africa has recorded a lower likelihood of hospitalization and serious morbidity. Omicron's apparent milder effects may be due to cross-reactive T cell responses established by vaccination or infection. The T cell response's resiliency was established in this study, which bodes well for the future emergence of more heavily altered types.

*Important notice​

medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Currently rated 5.0 by 1 person

Posted in: Medical Research News | Disease/Infection News
Tags: Antibodies, Antibody, Antigen, CD4, Cell, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Disease COVID-19, covid-19, Cytokine, Cytokines, Frequency, Human Leukocyte Antigen, immunity, Immunization, Intracellular, Leukocyte, Membrane, Protein, Research, Respiratory, SARS, SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Spike Protein, Syndrome, Vaccine, Virus

 

SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses from vaccines or infection remain robust against Omicron​

By Colin Lightfoot, M.Sc. Infection and ImmunityJan 3 2022Reviewed by Aimee Molineux

Multiple Spike (S) protein mutations in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) Omicron variant contribute to the virus's escape from neutralizing antibody responses, lowering vaccination protection against infection. It's unclear to what extent other adaptive response components, such as T cells, may still target Omicron and contribute to protection against catastrophic outcomes. T cells' ability to respond to Omicron spike was tested in participants who had been vaccinated with Ad26.CoV2.S or BNT162b2, as well as in unvaccinated convalescent COVID-19 patients.

In a new study, a team of researchers from multi-national institutions discovered that 70-80% of CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to spike were consistent across research groups. Moreover, although having far more mutations, the magnitude of Omicron cross-reactive T cells was comparable to that of the Beta and Delta variants. In addition, T cell responses to ancestral spike, nucleocapsid, and membrane proteins in Omicron-infected hospitalized patients were equivalent to those seen in individuals hospitalized in earlier waves dominated by the ancestral, Beta, or Delta variations.

According to these findings, despite Omicron's widespread mutations and lower susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies, the bulk of T cell responses elicited by vaccination or spontaneous infection cross-recognize the variation. Early clinical observations from South Africa suggest that well-preserved T cell immunity to Omicron may contribute to protection from severe COVID-19.

A preprint version of this study, which is yet to undergo peer review, is available on the medRxiv* server.

Study: SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses induced upon vaccination or infection remain robust against Omicron. Image Credit: Fusebulb / Shutterstock
Study: SARS-CoV-2 spike T cell responses induced upon vaccination or infection remain robust against Omicron. Image Credit: Fusebulb / Shutterstock

The study​

T cell responses were studied in people who had received one or two doses of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Johnson and Johnson/Janssen, n = 20 per group), two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech, n = 15), or had recovered from infection. Convalescent donors were investigated after a median of 1.4 months of moderate or asymptomatic illness. T cell responses to vaccination were assessed 22-32 days after the final dose in more than 85% of vaccinees. Immunization and infection both produced spike-specific CD4 T cell responses, while a CD8 response was found less frequently. Intracellular cytokine labeling was used to evaluate cytokine production in response to peptide pools that covered the entire Wuhan-1 spike protein and the Omicron spike.

ImageForNews_700660_16412715538024828.jpg


T cell response to the ancestral and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 spike after vaccination and in unvaccinated COVID-19 convalescent patients. a, Clinical characteristics of the study groups. *: data regarding time post-Covid-19 infection were available for only 6 out of the 13 participants who received one dose of Ad26.COV2.S. b, Proportion of participants exhibiting an ancestral spike-specific CD4 T cell response after vaccination with one or two doses of Ad26.COV2.S or two doses of BNT162b2. c, Profile of the ancestral spike-specific T cell response in vaccinees and convalescent individuals. d, Representative examples of IFN-γ production in response to ancestral and Omicron spike in two individuals who received two doses of Ad26.COV2.S. e,g, Frequency of spike-specific CD4 (e) and CD8 T cells (g) producing any of the measured cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2 or TNF-α) in response to ancestral and Omicron spike peptide pools. Bars represent the median of responders. Differences between SARS-CoV-2 variants were calculated using a Wilcoxon paired t-test. f, h, Fold change in the frequency of spike-specific CD4 (f) and CD8 T cells (h) between ancestral and Omicron spike responses. Bars represent medians. No significant differences were observed between groups using a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test. The number of participants included in each analysis is indicated on the graphs.

Related Stories​

In all groups studied, CD4 T cell frequencies to Omicron spike were consistently and considerably lower than the ancestral spike. This resulted in a median drop of 14-30% in CD4 responsiveness to Omicron, as evidenced by foldchange. In the case of the CD8 T cell response, vaccinees who had received two doses of Ad26.COV2.S and convalescent donors showed a significant reduction in the magnitude of Omicron spike-specific CD8 T cells, whereas the other groups did not. When compared to the ancestral virus, the CD8 response to Omicron was reduced by 17-25 %. A small percentage of responders showed a loss of CD8 T cell recognition of Omicron, which is likely due to mutations in specific CD8 epitopes affecting specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules.

T cell affinity can be reduced by mutations in variant epitopes, which can impact a cell's functional capacity. As a result, the authors evaluated the polyfunctional profiles of T cells in vaccinees and convalescent patients and found that both ancestral and Omicron-specific T cells have a similar capacity for cytokine co-expression across all groups. There were no variations in the polyfunctional profiles of CD4 or CD8 T cells between ancestral and Omicron spike, indicating that there was no functional impairment in cross-reactive Omicron T cell responses. By examining spike peptide pools matching the viral sequences of the Beta and Delta strains, the authors were able to compare Omicron spike responses to other variants of concern in Ad26.CoV2.S vaccinees.
With the exception of a higher drop in the Omicron CD4 response compared to Beta in recipients of two doses of Ad26.COV2.S, there were no significant variations in cross-reactive CD4 and CD8 T cell responses between Beta, Delta, and Omicron. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was linked to a larger frequency of spike-specific T lymphocytes in vaccinees but did not affect Omicron cross-reactivity. These findings reveal that Omicron spike CD4 and CD8 T cell recognition is mostly retained relative to the ancestral strain and comparable to other relevant variants with three times fewer mutations.

Implications​

Overall, these findings show that vaccination and infection elicit a robust CD4 and CD8 T cell response that predominantly cross-reacts with Omicron, consistent with recent research on T cell escape by Beta, Delta, and other variants. Despite significant neutralization escape against Omicron, the T cell response is retained in 70-80% of cases. Because Omicron's mutations have a limited influence on the T cell response, immunization or prior infection may still give significant protection against severe disease.

In fact, compared to the last Delta wave, South Africa has recorded a lower likelihood of hospitalization and serious morbidity. Omicron's apparent milder effects may be due to cross-reactive T cell responses established by vaccination or infection. The T cell response's resiliency was established in this study, which bodes well for the future emergence of more heavily altered types.

*Important notice​

medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Currently rated 5.0 by 1 person

Posted in: Medical Research News | Disease/Infection News
Tags: Antibodies, Antibody, Antigen, CD4, Cell, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Disease COVID-19, covid-19, Cytokine, Cytokines, Frequency, Human Leukocyte Antigen, immunity, Immunization, Intracellular, Leukocyte, Membrane, Protein, Research, Respiratory, SARS, SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Spike Protein, Syndrome, Vaccine, Virus

1641335576489.png


基本不懂,看一个视频介绍这篇南非文章,令很多科学家兴奋的结果,被感染过新冠,和接种过强生疫苗Ad26:1-2针,(一针是标准,2针是加强)和辉瑞疫苗BNT 2针以后,T细胞仍然留下85%以上的免疫反应。
 
3 hr 35 min ago

Hospital staff absences up nearly 60% in a week in England due to Covid-19, data shows​

From CNN's Amy Cassidy in Glasgow

Medical staff wearing FFP3 face masks walk along a corridor at King's College Hospital, in south east London. Picture date: Tuesday December 21, 2021.
Medical staff wearing FFP3 face masks walk along a corridor at King's College Hospital, in south east London. Picture date: Tuesday December 21, 2021. (Victoria Jones/PA/Getty Images)

Hospital staff absences in England increased by almost 60% in the week up to Jan. 2, due to Covid-19 "sickness or self-isolation," data from the National Health Service shows.

The number shot up by 59% from 24,632 on Dec. 26 to 39,142 on Jan. 2, according to the latest figures published Friday.

Covid-19-related absences account for almost half of the total 82,384 hospital staff absences on Jan. 2, the data also shows.

It comes as 200 troops have been deployed to support London hospitals amid the shortages, the Ministry of Defense announced Friday, as staff absences rose by 4% in the week up to Jan. 2.

However, the sharpest rise in staff absences occurred in the northern regions of England, now the epicenter of the country’s Omicron outbreak. Hospitals in the North West saw Covid-related staff absences rise by 85% compared to the previous week, while in the North East they almost doubled in numbers.
 
31 min ago

"Mild" Covid-19 may not feel mild. The severity of symptoms can vary dramatically.​

From CNN's Jen Christensen

Many people are hearing from their doctors that they have a "mild" Covid-19 infection amid a surge of the highly contagious Omicron variant of the coronavirus — but your illness may not feel as minor as "mild" sounds.

It was true for Michelle Cordes, a dietician at a Chicago-area hospital. She's vaccinated and boosted, and she says she has done everything she can to avoid catching the virus, like wearing a mask and avoiding crowds. So when she didn't feel great on Dec. 30, she thought it was a cold or maybe allergies to the cat her daughter brought home from college.

Just to be on the safe side, she took a home test and was surprised to find that she was positive for Covid-19. Her husband, son and father-in-law also tested positive.

"We all developed a cough. We all had post-nasal drip. I had the itchy kind of throat, and my husband and I both had night sweats for like four nights in a row," Cordes said.

"Mild" is a word that seems to fit Cordes' symptoms, compared with the ones she sees in her patients at the hospital, she said. But her illness didn't feel like a mild cold, either.

What Covid-19 actually feels like can vary dramatically. Studies have shown that disease from Omicron is generally milder than from the Delta coronavirus variant, and some people have no symptoms or only brief, minor sniffles. But it can still cause serious disease, especially among the unvaccinated. There are 126,410 people currently hospitalized with Covid-19, about 89% of the way to last year's peak, according to US Department of Health and Human Services.
But even disease considered "mild" can still be uncomfortable and prolonged.

The National Institutes of Health's definition of "mild" Covid-19 includes symptoms that people are all too familiar with these days, like fever, cough, sore throat and fatigue. They're symptoms that Dr. Shira Doron has realized are nothing to, well, sneeze at.

Use of the word "mild" "isn't meant to minimize your experience, said Doron, a hospital epidemiologist and infectious disease physician at Tufts Medical Center in Boston.

Even people with mild illness can develop what's called long Covid, with symptoms that stick around for six months or more. She thinks the "mild" term that experts prefer may need to be reframed.

"When we or when the CDC or the NIH says 'mild,' we really mean it didn't make you sick enough to go to the hospital," Doron said. "But when you get a flu-like illness that puts you in bed, that's not mild to you."

Cordes ended up sitting in her pajamas for three days, something she says she has never done before.

"We've felt crappy and tired," Cordes said. "On Monday, we took our tree down, and by one o'clock, we were all exhausted."

She feels better this week and is up to taking on a paper-shredding project, but she's not back at work yet.

Correction: An earlier version of this post incorrectly spelled Dr. Shira Doron's name.

Read the full article here.
 
43 min ago

South Africa's Omicron surge was shaped like an "ice pick," CDC head says. What that could mean for the US.​

From CNN’s Jamie Gumbrecht

The wave of Omicron Covid-19 cases in South Africa was an “ice pick” rather than a wave, and the United States may see a similar precipitous rise and fall in cases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a CDC telebriefing on Friday.

There are some reasons to expect the surges will look the same — and reasons they may differ, she said.

“There are many things about South Africa that make it a little bit different than the United States. For example, they do have a huge proportion of their population with previous disease. We have a larger proportion of our population that is vaccinated and boosted,” Walensky said.

“I do think in places that we are seeing this really steep incline, that we may well see also a precipitous decline,” she said. “But we're also a much bigger country than South Africa, and so it may very well be that we see this ice-pick shape, but that it travels across the country. Right now, we're of course seeing it in the Northeast in the highest burden.”
 
后退
顶部