抛开政治立场，你认为蔡英文有博士学位吗？

[gocanoeing]

挑战integrity. 尼克松和小克林顿都是不会第三次参加选举， 而且被质询时永远也不会再竞选从政

没有关键证据，不会有质询

 

[superlover]

蔡博士和习博士比，一看就知道谁有博士学位了。

这事两回事吧

 

[superlover]

咋不调查习大帝有没有博士学位呢？

西不是民选的，他不需要用学历真假证明他的诚信，他的学位自己所服务国家授予（同学搞关系送的），也不涉及国安问题。

菜造假（细思极恐的），不仅对选民的诚信，且可能被外国政府绑架勒索，损失国家利益

 

[superlover]

蒋介石的日本士官学校毕业就是假的。不过要说道上当受骗，我看谁也不如49年选择留在大陆的那批知识分子和资本家印象深刻。

我似乎看到他自己的身份证写的日本振武学堂

 

[superlover]

拿郭文贵来比比也可以，至少他是初中没毕业的

郭文贵和习近平的都属小学毕业生，他们都很厉害，他们都不民选总统

 

[welcomelm]

我似乎看到他自己的身份证写的日本振武学堂

他47年大选的履历上是日本士官学校毕业，振武是士官的预科。

 

[飞来客]

蔡家钱多，富可敌国，有钱能使鬼推磨。要多少个博士都行。胡适就有三十几个博士。

 

[飞来客]

习有权有势，让中国所有大学给他发博士学位都没有问题

算你开窍了。但人家可没炫耀，说他有1.5个博士。

 

[lindamy]

Richardson Reports

News you can't get anywhere else....

richardsonreports.wordpress.com

这个在英国打官司赢了的美国记者贴出了最新消息。
从这个官司看，基本是否决了替蔡总统出证明的LSE法务处领导的证明。
不提习总是不是有娱乐，中国本来就不是民主社会，把习非拉过来跟蔡比较，本来就是看低台湾民主。

蔡的博士这个事太蹊跷，什么都丢失了，博士虽然不值钱，拿博士当上总统有不是什么大不了的，但是如果被曝光而去隐瞒就是个严重问题，也跟号称的民主大相径庭。想想如果这个事发生在美加，起码有什么听证会吧。

这个林克内容很多，只引用最初几段。

感兴趣的看看吧。

论文三本全部找不到踪迹，包括各种目录，当年毕业的博士论文都是排号列出的，却无法查到蔡的名字，直到2019年被追究后才出现。导师一个都无法证实，答辩的时间地点人物，所有纪录都不存在。

唯一对蔡有利的是曾经刊登在LSE上的一纸声明，却被质疑是与台政府有关人员出资发表的。现在有人质疑她的硕士文凭都可能有疑问。几年前她曾经赴美考的律师执政，但是两年后被停牌，这是对律师非常严格的惩处。。。。

Information Review Tribunal judge rejects University of London claim President Tsai Ing-wen’s PhD thesis was lost by library​

Information Review Tribunal Judge Hazel Oliver and Republic of China in-exile President Tsai Ing-wen’s 1983 PhD thesis that the University of London claims was lost by librarians. (credits: Lewis Silkin/Hwan Lin)
Information Review Tribunal Judge Hazel Oliver has rejected the dog-ate-my-homework story of the University of London that the PhD thesis of Republic of China in-exile President Tsai Ing-wen was lost-in-the-library. Although Judge Oliver upheld a secrecy shield about the qualification viva examination of the thesis as Tsai’s personal data the University’s claim that librarians lost the thesis was disregarded.

“The appellant says that the absence of the original thesis from any of the libraries, as required by the University’s rules, indicates that there was no thesis at the time. Having viewed the emails from the libraries and the video from Dr. Peng, it does appear that none of the libraries have a record of the thesis being provided at the time the PhD was awarded in 1984. We accept that the explanation provided by the University that the thesis had been lost or mis-shelved may not be correct, as there is no catalogue or microfilm record of the original thesis.”

“A video of Dr. Peng conducting a search for President Tsai’s PhD thesis on the computer records of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS) library, assisted by a member of the library staff….shows that they were unable to find a record of the thesis under President Tsai’s name or title of the thesis. The member of the staff says that if the thesis had gone missing it would be in the catalogue, and as it is not there suggests that the library had not received it.”

“As explained above, it does appear from the evidence that copies of the thesis may not have been provided to the libraries at the time by the examiners, rather than having been lost or mis-shelved.”

The appellant is a Taiwanese-American who sought details about the thesis viva examination and now plans to seek permission to appeal the decision. Under the legal system of the United Kingdom the appellant must seek the judge’s permission to appeal. The appellant believes the court made an error of law on the necessity of transparent verification by shielding the University of London with a cloak of secrecy. The University’s excuse about the library losing a thesis it never had in its collection severely undermines the school’s credibility about unverifed claims concerning the thesis and should have been a red flag for the judge.

President Tsai’s thesis, entitled Unfair Trade Practices and Safeguard Actions, has been at the center of controversy since June 2019 when Tsai filed the thesis with the London School of Economics Library, thirty-five years after it was due on the shelves. Although Tsai attended LSE, the University of London awarded her a PhD degree as her own school could not then issue advanced degrees. Tsai’s advisor at LSE was Michael Elliott, who himself lacked a PhD degree.

Judge Oliver’s rebuke to the University of London is not the first time the school has been slapped over the thesis controversy. In September 2021, the Information Commissioner threatened the University with a citation for contempt of court if it failed to disclose email communications about the thesis that the school had wrongly declared to be President Tsai’s personal data.

“The steps that the University and the LSE have taken in order to locate the missing thesis do not involve President Tsai and the emails do not indicate that she had any involvement in (or even knowledge of) what was happening. Therefore the emails cannot reasonably be said to be relevant to any decision involving President Tsai. She is not the subject of these emails – her thesis is. The Commissioner is thus satisfied that the emails have insufficient connection to President Tsai to be her personal data.”

The University of London backed down and released the requested email messages which have not yet been made available to the public. However, absent a threat of contempt of court, the University of London continues to stonewall requests for information. Presently the school has failed to provide the 1983 thesis examiner regulations as requested, even though no personal data of any sort is sought.

The appellant in the latest Tribunal case “accepts that the University has stated publicly that it holds records of the viva and that President Tsai was awarded a PhD degree.”

“When asked about this by the Judge, he initially said that he didn’t think the University was telling the truth. He went on to say that he can’t say the University is lying, but he hasn’t been able to get a straight answer.”

 

[lindamy]

蔡家钱多，富可敌国，有钱能使鬼推磨。要多少个博士都行。胡适就有三十几个博士。

这不可混为一谈，看过吕秀莲对蔡博士的质疑视频，她说她自己就读过哈佛，但是没有拿到学位，她共有6各名誉博士学位。这是正常的，没有任何闲人会去打假。

 

[飞来客]

这不可混为一谈，看过吕秀莲对蔡博士的质疑视频，她说她自己就读过哈佛，但是没有拿到学位，她共有6各名誉博士学位。这是正常的，没有任何闲人会去打假。

是的，凡是坚持、信仰个人自由主义者，要得到博士学位，在西方都易如反掌。
但被人打假的，肯定有猫腻。

 

[superlover]

其实蔡的事，最早才是大陆民运人士曹长青揭发的 （曹当年猛打杨澜老公假博士），

蔡民主气度或个人气量太小（比马小多了），把鼓吹深绿但批评她的彭文正（也是美国正牌新闻/传播学博士，台大教授）节目给关了，这些把彭文正给惹急了，不屈不饶追打蔡的假博士。现在才有少数国民党人来与彭合流。

 

[superlover]

蔡英文的博士是假的，但她能力很强是真，她能在派系纷争的民进党中摆平那么多老男人政客，比真博士马英九强多了，民调一直居高不下，

在台上经济看似一直不错，能力直逼阿辉伯

 

[billwanhua]

我似乎看到他自己的身份证写的日本振武学堂

他47年大选的履历上是日本士官学校毕业，振武是士官的预科。

他自称日本士官学校毕业，其实根本不是，后来掌权后，捐了一大笔钱给日本士官学校毕业的在日中国人掩口，避免暴露不是他们同学。
不过老将那个时候不是民选总统，起码不是民主民选，顶多拿来跟习比，不可能拿来跟蔡比。

 

[光放]

此贴充分的说明民主已死。任何事情都会由于强烈的政治立场而变成一地鸡毛。事实真相已经毫无价值，道德底线当然无存，何谈自律与共容？