来个真正巨大好消息,LG子公司在安省温莎投资41亿建电池厂


Jim Greenberger, the executive director of NAATBatt International, a trade group that advocates for battery development and manufacturing in the U.S., said he has no objection to a CATL plant in North America, so long as the company brings battery manufacturing technology and know-how to the U.S., not just low-wage assembly jobs. The U.S. should mimic China’s joint ventures with western businesses.

“The principle would be largely the same: we’ll give you market access, and in exchange, you have to transfer tech to us and our people,”
he said. “That plants the seeds for future economic development that could be quite valuable.” Battery cell design, manufacturing equipment, and factory operations all are areas where, as Greenberger sees it, the U.S. could use some tutoring.

什么时候也西方开始 “市场换技术了”?

把这个工厂也搞到安省来
 

Jim Greenberger, the executive director of NAATBatt International, a trade group that advocates for battery development and manufacturing in the U.S., said he has no objection to a CATL plant in North America, so long as the company brings battery manufacturing technology and know-how to the U.S., not just low-wage assembly jobs. The U.S. should mimic China’s joint ventures with western businesses.

“The principle would be largely the same: we’ll give you market access, and in exchange, you have to transfer tech to us and our people,”
he said. “That plants the seeds for future economic development that could be quite valuable.” Battery cell design, manufacturing equipment, and factory operations all are areas where, as Greenberger sees it, the U.S. could use some tutoring.

什么时候也西方开始 “市场换技术了”?

把这个工厂也搞到安省来

想想也是哈,low wage的工作为什么到北美来搞,不合算啊。另一方面,如果一提low wage总想到中国,这大国都崛起到哪去了。
 
想想也是哈,low wage的工作为什么到北美来搞,不合算啊。另一方面,如果一提low wage总想到中国,这大国都崛起到哪去了。
对,不能把半成品从中国运过来组装,如果那样,还不如不搞
 
加拿大都介样了,为啥不能搞? 还剩了物流费呢。 一样价低成本
 


  • But a U.S. trade expert told Bloomberg that CATL’s entry in the U.S. is fine as long as the company brings along its manufacturing know-how. “The principle would be largely the same: We’ll give you market access, and in exchange, you have to transfer tech to us and our people,” he said.
The context: One of the most acrimonious issues in U.S.-China relations is China’s long-standing practice of forcing Western companies to give up their tech — via a joint venture, for example — in exchange for market access. China’s accession to the WTO in 2001 should have made quid pro quo practices illegal, but technology transfers continued unabated.

  • There are other reasons for the U.S. to welcome CATL: The company’s entrance could create tens of thousands of jobs, offset a U.S. battery supply-chain shortage, as well as supercharge long-term EV adoption.
  • U.S. battery startups, which could theoretically be snuffed out by CATL’s entrance, don’t seem too worried: One battery maker told Bloomberg that piggybacking off a giant buyer could make it easier and cheaper for his company to get much-needed supplies.
The takeaway: That U.S. trade specialists are now openly considering similar tactics in response to CATL indicates a marked turnaround from what was formerly a lopsided technology relationship between two of the world’s biggest economies.

“Is the shoe now on the other foot?” quipped the official Twitter account of Sino Auto Insights, a Beijing-based consultancy.
 

Canada to invest $2B on mineral strategy for EV battery supply chain​


Published April 4, 2022 5:29 p.m. EDT

OTTAWA - Canada's federal budget will include an investment of at least $2 billion for a strategy to accelerate the production and processing of critical minerals needed for the electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chain, two senior government sources said.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government, which is due to release its budget on Thursday, will make the investment to ramp up the extraction of processing of critical minerals including nickel, lithium, cobalt and magnesium, said the sources who are familiar with the matter but were not authorized to speak on the record.

The investment could be spread over more than one year, but the sources declined to comment on the time frame.

RELATED STORIES​

Canada last month announced financial support for building two facilities that will make battery materials for electric vehicles, and one battery gigafactory, but no agreements have yet been announced for mineral extraction or refining.

"There are some particular projects that we are looking at and working on at the present time," Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said in a recent telephone interview with Reuters.

All the potential projects, "whether they're extraction or processing, need to be accelerated significantly, and that's what the critical mineral strategy will be about," he added.

Canada's finance ministry declined to confirm whether the investment would be in the budget that will be presented by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland in the House of Commons.

"Canada has an abundance of valuable critical mineral deposits, and with the right investments, this sector can create thousands of new good jobs, grow our economy, and make Canada a vital part of the growing global critical minerals industry," said Adrienne Vaupshas, press secretary for Freeland.

There are "many active conversations" between the Canadian government and companies "on the need to accelerate and scale up the production of raw materials used in EV batteries," one of the sources said.

Canada, which is home to a large mining sector, has a multi-billion-dollar fund set up to invest in green technologies and is trying to woo companies involved in all levels of the EV supply chain to safeguard the future of its manufacturing heartland in Ontario as the world seeks to cut carbon emissions.
Ontario is geographically close to U.S.-based automakers in Michigan and Ohio, and General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co and Stellantis NV have all announced plans to make electric vehicles at factories in the Canadian province.

MINERALS FROM MINING WASTE​


Since it can take many years - even a decade or more - to open new mines, Wilkinson said some of the projects being considered involve "tailings from existing mines from which you could extract critical minerals."

"We're looking at brines and oil sands, tailings ponds, and all of those things," he said.

Brendan Marshall, the vice president of economic and northern affairs for the Mining Association of Canada, said this kind of project would require research.

"There needs to be research and development" to develop technologies that can identify and separate critical minerals "from the general waste stream," Marshall said.

Canada's critical mineral strategy will focus on, among other things, driving research, innovation and exploration, one of the sources said.

GM said on Monday that it was investing C$2 billion on two plants, including one that will produce an electric vehicle for commercial use in Canada. Last month, GM said it had partnered with South Korea's POSCO Chemical to build a facility to make battery materials in Quebec.

Scott Bell, the president and managing director of GM Canada, said last month that Canada's abundance of nickel and other raw materials would be used to make cathode active material in the Canadian province, without elaborating.

"These companies are going to need those critical minerals that our country has, so we need to start aggressively ramping up the mining and processing required," Canadian Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said in Vancouver last week.

Demand for minerals needed for batteries, including lithium and cobalt, could increase by almost 500% by 2050, the World Bank estimates. Currently Asia, and in particular China, dominates global production and processing of critical minerals, rare earths and rare metals used to make EVs.

Constantine Karayannopoulos, president and chief executive officer of Neo Performance Materials Inc, a rare earths and rare metals processing company based in Toronto, said Canada and North America have a lot of catching up to do.

"We are behind the eight ball collectively in the West, behind China," Karayannopoulos said in a telephone interview.

"China is dominating this space ... We need a lot of money (to build the supply chain) because we're playing catch-up."

(Reporting by Steve Schere Editing by Paul Simao)

 
最后编辑:
资本家不傻,政府不出钱补贴,他们才不会做投资,现在自由经济已死,全世界所有政府都学中国拿钱拿地补贴。


不奇怪。在没有爆炸性的生产力提升之前,谁能降价吃苦,谁就能坚持到最后。说白了,就是人类一起卷。
 
像楼上说的,对环境的影响如何?
 
环保电池!
现在以电池解决化石燃料污染,过50年肯定有其他东西解决电池污染,再过N*50年又有新东西解决(N-1)*50的污染,人类要不折腾无法发展经济,大家就饿肚子
 
现在以电池解决化石燃料污染,过50年肯定有其他东西解决电池污染,再过N*50年又有新东西解决(N-1)*50的污染,人类要不折腾无法发展经济,大家就饿肚子
不用化石燃料,就要用核能,建更多反应堆,一个泄露,就都老实了。至于风能太阳能更是灾难,但土豆这样的文科无脑政客喜欢。
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的