从美国高院有关学费贷款减免的官司看平等


Marc Andreessen: We’re heading into a world where a flat-screen TV that covers your entire wall costs $100 and a 4-year degree costs $1M​

Marc Andreessen isn’t worried about artificial intelligence taking people’s jobs. The way he sees it, technological innovation isn’t allowed to disrupt much of the economy anyway.

The cofounder of venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz laid out his thoughts in his newsletter this weekend.

In less regulated sectors of economy, Andreessen argues, “technology whips through them, pushing down prices and raising quality every year.” Think computer software, cell phone services, and TVs.

But in other sectors, technological innovation is “virtually forbidden,” he writes.

“The prices of education, health care, and housing as well as anything provided or controlled by the government are going to the moon, even as those sectors are technologically stagnant,” he notes.


What’s more, very little is being done to address this problem, he writes: “We are heading into a world where a flat-screen TV that covers your entire wall costs $100, and a four-year college degree costs $1 million, and nobody has anything even resembling a proposal on how to systemically fix this.”
 
一针见血,应该拔掉吸血管!
这个应该是前几天马斯克评价这个事的意思,大概意思是,如果豁免了学费,未来学生会希望下次再免,大学看钱来的容易会不断提高学费,贷款机构看风险小政府背书就加大贷款额,造成恶性循环
 
那就象欧洲一样,大学,医疗全公办,几乎免费。但是那样,经济又失去活力了,也和美国的商业文化不符。

加拿大的公费医疗不是照样被吐糟。
但是再怎么吐槽也比米帝强千百倍。
 
但是再怎么吐槽也比米帝强千百倍。

比米帝强,但是我身边的同事这些年只有离开加拿大去美国的,还没听说过回来的。
 
我家邻居(之前在麻省)去年底回来了;); 另一个2021年去了google 的正在回来的路上。
这年头儿,除非出类拔萃一年40万的IT/金融高端,或者找不到好工作又不甘心的;其余有份儿稳当工作的,还是老实窝在村儿里苟着吧。
 
最后编辑:
后退
顶部