美国儿童和Teen的第一致死原因是枪支

metropolis

本站元老
注册
2010-12-10
消息
8,298
荣誉分数
1,519
声望点数
323

最近发生在纳什维尔小学的枪击案是今年 K-12年级学生的第16起,全部人口的第130起大规模枪击事件 mass shooting, 这是十年来的最高值。​


2021年,枪支造成的1-18岁死亡人数3600人,占这类死亡原因全部人口的19%。​

Children and teens are more likely to die by guns than anything else​

By Annette Choi, CNN
Updated 8:41 AM EDT, Wed March 29, 2023

CNN — Guns are the leading cause of death for US children and teens, since surpassing car accidents in 2020.

Firearms accounted for nearly 19% of childhood deaths (ages 1-18) in 2021, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder database. Nearly 3,600 children died in gun-related incidents that year. That’s about five children lost for every 100,000 children in the United States. In no other comparable country are firearms within the top four causes of mortality among children, according to a KFF analysis.

Screenshot_20230329-101146.png


The shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville on Monday, marks the 16th shooting this year in grades K-12 and the deadliest since the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, last year, according to a CNN analysis of school shooting data. Six people — three children and three adults — were killed.

There have been 130 mass shootings so far in 2023, the highest number of shootings recorded at this point in any year since at least 2013, according to data from the Gun Violence Archive.

Child and teen mortality overall surged during the Covid-19 pandemic — driven not by Covid-19 deaths but by fatal injuries, according to a new study in JAMA. Firearms accounted for nearly half of the increase in mortality in 2020.

CNN’s Deidre McPhillips contributed to this report


 

最近发生在纳什维尔小学的枪击案是今年 K-12年级学生的第16起,全部人口的第130起大规模枪击事件 mass shooting, 这是十年来的最高值。​


2021年,枪支造成的1-18岁死亡人数3600人,占这类死亡原因全部人口的19%。​

Children and teens are more likely to die by guns than anything else​

By Annette Choi, CNN
Updated 8:41 AM EDT, Wed March 29, 2023

CNN — Guns are the leading cause of death for US children and teens, since surpassing car accidents in 2020.

Firearms accounted for nearly 19% of childhood deaths (ages 1-18) in 2021, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder database. Nearly 3,600 children died in gun-related incidents that year. That’s about five children lost for every 100,000 children in the United States. In no other comparable country are firearms within the top four causes of mortality among children, according to a KFF analysis.

浏览附件1088097

The shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville on Monday, marks the 16th shooting this year in grades K-12 and the deadliest since the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, last year, according to a CNN analysis of school shooting data. Six people — three children and three adults — were killed.

There have been 130 mass shootings so far in 2023, the highest number of shootings recorded at this point in any year since at least 2013, according to data from the Gun Violence Archive.

Child and teen mortality overall surged during the Covid-19 pandemic — driven not by Covid-19 deaths but by fatal injuries, according to a new study in JAMA. Firearms accounted for nearly half of the increase in mortality in 2020.
CNN’s Deidre McPhillips contributed to this report


你这些数据没用,干得过靠军火发财的大佬吗,大佬们花钱在背后操纵搞政治的,所以屁民说了不算
 
不要着急,也许过两天心肌炎就超过这个了。
 
这图中画的是top five,其他死因还排不上。
 
@ztbll 会说那是因为儿童拥枪权被白左限制了。
昨天有个16月婴儿被枪击致死,怎么武装?最多是武装他爹娘,爷爷奶奶了。无论如何都是防不胜防。
 
不要着急,也许过两天心肌炎就超过这个了。

也是題外話(我習慣胡說八道),先跟版主道歉。

先不討論槍枝致死兒童多少人,據說每年美國失蹤穩穩的 8-10萬兒童,不知道算不算「失蹤致死」。比起失蹤數,槍枝致死的兒童數...

在我看,媒體大幅報導槍枝致死只是炒禁槍(解除人民武裝)的大好機會...真要檢討,媒體為何沒優先炒「失蹤兒童」?
 
盲猜,加拿大应该是毒品
 
先不討論槍枝致死兒童多少人
本贴主题不就是枪支跟儿童死亡的关系?:monster:
據說每年美國失蹤穩穩的 8-10萬兒童,不知道算不算「失蹤致死」
失踪不算致死,参见字典。

“Missing children in U.S. nearly always make it home alive”
 
本贴主题不就是枪支跟儿童死亡的关系?:monster:

失踪不算致死,参见字典。

“Missing children in U.S. nearly always make it home alive”

我當然知道啊,唉,挑刺...
重點是,致死會是重點嗎?
 
我當然知道啊,唉,挑刺...
重點是,致死會是重點嗎?

一樣,以下胡說八道。

今天推特一位德國女性批評美國要禁槍就沒槍擊致死了,結果一位美國人出來批評,外國人根本不懂美國文化啥的...(有興趣的,視頻在以下)

真要說致死,有多少人知道光疫苗每年「致死」的兒童又有多少...。好,也別總說疫苗了,每年光是藥物(合法的、非法的)致死的又有多少,一樣是幾十萬。問問ChatGPT吧。

我想說的還是:別挑刺,「致死」不是重點,關鍵字「mass shooting」這新聞標題背後所代表的意義才是重點。

 
昨天有个16月婴儿被枪击致死,怎么武装?最多是武装他爹娘,爷爷奶奶了。无论如何都是防不胜防。

同意。跟槍不槍根本無關。

匹夫無罪, 懷璧其罪 ?(請倒著解讀,別說我又用錯成語的「定義」了,呵呵。)
 
一樣,以下胡說八道。

今天推特一位德國女性批評美國要禁槍就沒槍擊致死了,結果一位美國人出來批評,外國人根本不懂美國文化啥的...(有興趣的,視頻在以下)

真要說致死,有多少人知道光疫苗每年「致死」的兒童又有多少...。好,也別總說疫苗了,每年光是藥物(合法的、非法的)致死的又有多少,一樣是幾十萬。問問ChatGPT吧。

我想說的還是:別挑刺,「致死」不是重點,關鍵字「mass shooting」這新聞標題背後所代表的意義才是重點。


这种论点就像每次有人批判中国,马上有爱国党说美国有同样问题,种族歧视等等,每次有人批判美国,就有美粉说中国这样那样有问题。

每年有很多这种问题那种问题,这种死法那种死法,但是一个问题不能减低另一个问题的强度,每个问题都应该解决,特别是排第一的问题。

拿另一个问题来弱化目前讨论的问题都是逃避
 
后退
顶部