想要把出租房卖了,怎么做合法?

自己搬进去住是不是就能解决问题了?
搬进去也可以,自己住一年,加上赶走租客的过程,可能要将近两年才能挂牌卖。如果他已经给租客透露了要卖房,然后又要搬进去,如果租客要等hearing,被判定bad faith的可能性比较大。
 
请教万能的CFC, 想要卖掉出租房,租客住在那快两年,房租没拖欠。如果租客住在那,肯定影响showing,而且租客也可能不是很想配合。如果租客愿意60天后搬走再卖,需要让租客签什麽文件? 这种情况是否都需要提供一个月免费住?谢谢
最后结果怎么样了?租客配合吗?
 
听的我这小房东脊梁骨直发凉。
这房子是房东的吗?
是,你要对这房子负所有责任。贷款,地税,保险,,,,,一样都不能少。
不是,你几乎失去了一切控制权,包括买卖甚至自己住的权利。看租客脸色行事,什么都做不了。
 
听的我这小房东脊梁骨直发凉。
这房子是房东的吗?
是,你要对这房子负所有责任。贷款,地税,保险,,,,,一样都不能少。
不是,你几乎失去了一切控制权,包括买卖甚至自己住的权利。看租客脸色行事,什么都做不了。
社会主义国家就是这样的,开饭馆开超市当房东全是罪恶,零元购零元吃零元住。。。
 


"The house is packed. They're ready to move in, but the tenants refuse to leave

A couple's bid to buy their first home could be scuppered by tenants who won't leave

The buyers of a four-bedroom home in White Oaks say a standoff between them and an uncooperative family of tenants who refuse to leave has left them in legal limbo, causing weeks of sleepless nights and could even sink the $527,000 sale.

Jeff Skuse and Kate Smith bought the four-bedroom home that "fits their family needs." The home is within walking distance of their children's school and backs onto a network of trails that run through the White Oaks suburb.

But the deal they signed in March may not come to pass because a family of tenants is refusing to move out before the deal is set to close on Monday, June 12.

The tenants, who did not want to be identified, declined to speak to CBC News Thursday.

Skuse and Smith say the stress of the ordeal has been "incredible."

"I haven't stopped crying because I don't know what to do," Smith told CBC News on Thursday. "I don't know what to tell the kids. The house is packed. We're ready to go."

To make matters worse, Skuse and Smith say their landlord is lawfully evicting them from their apartment by August 31, compounding the pressure for the couple and their three children to move into their new home before they're left homeless.

Jeff Skuse and Kate Smith signed a deal to buy a $527,000 house in March, but the tenants who already live there have so far refused to leave before the deal closes on June 12.

The couple is currently seeking a 60-day extension on the purchase agreement through the courts while the landlord tries to get the tenants to leave through Ontario's Landlord Tenant Board (LTB), which could take up to a year to get a ruling.

"The system is broken," said Skuse. "We just want to give our children some stability."
Tenants who refuse to leave becoming more common

The standoff is emblematic of a housing market where the surge in prices has pushed disputes between tenants and landlords into overdrive, with tenants who refuse to leave becoming more common as they opt to contest the eviction in front of a provincial tribunal in an attempt to stand their ground.
a home

"More and more tenants aren't picking up and leaving," said Harry Fine, a retired paralegal who spent 21 years representing clients at the LTB and now offers training for landlords and real estate agents to, in his words, "keep them out of trouble."

Fine said in any case where a landlord decides to sell a property with tenants, the landlord is taking on a big legal risk, especially if they guarantee the tenant will be gone by the time the buyer takes possession, opening themselves up to a potential lawsuit if the tenants are uncooperative.

"The seller, he's the one with the biggest risk if they guaranteed vacant possession," he said. "The buyer can refuse to close."

As for the tenants, Fine said, all they have to do is insist on a hearing in front of the LTB and they can hold up the entire process for months or even up to a year, and all the while avoid moving and, in turn, paying more rent in a highly competitive market.

"It's going to take six months to get a hearing, so I might as well just wait to get a hearing and that'll give me six months."

Fine said there is an option to ask the tribunal for a quicker hearing, but with a huge backlog before the LTB, getting one is a slim possibility.

"Everybody's filing a request to shorten the time to get a hearing, so it's really tough to get approval," he said. "It's a mess.""
 
Half glass empty and half glass full.

You invested $50k on a downpayment 10 years ago, and your tenants paid your mortgage. Your house is worth $1 m now. You should be grateful to our government and central bank's zirp and QE for so long. It is seldom to have both ways in this universe.
 
Half glass empty and half glass full.

You invested $50k on a downpayment 10 years ago, and your tenants paid your mortgage. Your house is worth $1 m now. You should be grateful to our government and central bank's zirp and QE for so long. It is seldom to have both ways in this universe.
看来表面是政府是坑房东,实际上是联合房东一起坑房客,当然如果政府填坑的时候,对于冲进去的房东,那是你自己的问题。

房价搞这么高,房客其实伤害最大,顶多5%的房客是坏房客,房东赚那么多钱,承受5%的损失应该是可控,但是95%的好房客都受房价房租上涨的损害,也可能永远买不起房。
 
最后编辑:
Half glass empty and half glass full.

You invested $50k on a downpayment 10 years ago, and your tenants paid your mortgage. Your house is worth $1 m now. You should be grateful to our government and central bank's zirp and QE for so long. It is seldom to have both ways in this universe.
数字错了,不会十年从5万涨到100万。当然理解你只是举例。
 
投资房产,如果那么不堪,为什么还那么多人前仆后继?指望自己暴利,租客“寄人篱下”过日子不现实。
 
数字错了,不会十年从5万涨到100万。当然理解你只是举例。
就是5万,房客给你付的mortage. 很多老外投资就是这么干的, 弄一个定期贷款,从来不追加投资,到了老卖了,就是100万。
中国人投资,好像要很快还完,都弄活期,急着弄快钱。
当然你每年收入报税要付一点,不过减去利息,地税,保险也没有多少
 
最后编辑:
就是5万,房客给你付的mortage. 很多老外投资就是这么干的, 弄一个定期贷款,从来不追加投资,到了老卖了,就是100万。
中国人投资,好像要很快还完,都弄活期,急着弄快钱。
当然你每年收入报税要付一点,不过减去利息,地税,保险也没有多少
这么操作?那么就更应该政策偏向租客。
 
现在一百万的房子,十年前应该要50万。%10首付的话,应该要买保险吧?保险要多少钱?我不懂。

保险都可以抵税,收入高的,一半金额大概都抵税了。

我当年买房,td一个负责贷款的老外就让我贷定期,他说出租房需要的是稳定,房租balance 你的开支就可以了,多了要交税,而且还有活期贷款有风险,你需要有存款准备
 
后退
顶部