重磅:麦克自己承认另一个麦克做间谍

在这个关键时候,媒体出一个这个新闻,是不是土豆也要跟土鳖和好?把这个事彻底翻篇。

新闻从来都不全是“新闻”
也许现在正好到了讨论“国赔”的时候
 
也许现在正好到了讨论“国赔”的时候
很大可能,朝鲜边境的麦克可能爆出这个,为了向国家索赔。
他跟另外一个麦克分享了秘密,“不知道”另外一个麦克是国家间谍把这个给了5眼,所以导致他坐牢,他现在要索赔。

这个事涉及很多国家机密,不可能上庭,估计政府会跟他律师私下和解赔偿

这应该是合理的解释,屁民又要出几千万买单了
 
最后编辑:
Kovrig现在哪里工作?
 
这两天这个大案也到了结案陈词阶段,前皇家骑警情报高官向中国出卖情报,他有好多歪理。等待最后判决吧。

Ex-RCMP intelligence director Cameron Ortis’s testimony based on ‘fiction’: Crown​


 
1。间谍A出卖了间谍B。

2。间谍B现在感觉冤枉。间谍B只是提供信息给间谍A,当时不知道A干的龌蹉勾当。
Mr. Spavor was charged by Chinese prosecutors with spying for a foreign entity and illegally procuring state secrets. Mr. Kovrig was charged with illegally receiving state secrets and intelligence in collaboration with Mr. Spavor.

The sources said Mr. Phillips is alleging that his client was arrested by China because of information that he shared with Mr. Kovrig. That information, he alleges, was later passed on, unbeknownst to Mr. Spavor, to the Canadian government and its Five Eyes spy-service partners in the course of Mr. Kovrig’s duties as a diplomat with the Foreign Affairs department’s Global Security Reporting Program.

总结有一定道理,原来文章报道就是这个意思

If "间谍B" got remunerations from the government agencies for providing information, "间谍B" could not sue 间谍A even though his arrest was because of 间谍A's confession.

On the other hand, if "间谍B" did not receive any money for providing information, he still could be arrested as long as the information he procured was classified as "national security". But he could sue 间谍A for being later passed on the information to spy agencies without his knowledge which resulted in his arrest.

"间谍B" is now "seeking a multimillion-dollar settlement from Ottawa." as Globe and Mail said.

Who is going to pay for it?

Not just money, but Canada's international reputation too.

PM once so earnestly said the detention of two Michaels was arbitrary, requested so many alley countries to help, and signed a letter to condemn the arbitrary detention of two Canadians.

Sighhh, Canada!
 
If "间谍B" got remunerations from the government agencies for providing information, "间谍B" could not sue 间谍A even though his arrest was because of 间谍A's confession.

On the other hand, if "间谍B" did not receive any money for providing information, he still could be arrested as long as the information he procured was classified as "national security". But he could sue 间谍A for being later passed on the information to spy agencies without his knowledge which resulted in his arrest.

"间谍B" is now "seeking a multimillion-dollar settlement from Ottawa." as Globe and Mail said.

Who is going to pay for it?

Not just money, but Canada's international reputation too.

PM once so earnestly said the detention of two Michaels was arbitrary, requested so many alley countries to help, and signed a letter to condemn the arbitrary detention of two Canadians.

Sighhh, Canada!
PM is really stupid to got us involved in the first place.
1.He could have refused to detain Meng in the first place given Trump was not good to Canada then, or
2. If he does detain Meng, he could have sent plane to take both mikes home at the same time
 
最后编辑:
PM is really stupid to got us involved in the first place.
1.He could have refused to detain Meng in the first place given Trump was not good to Canada then, or
2. If he does 1, he could have sent plane to take both mikes home at the same time
我一直认为这事川普和土豆事先都不知情,川普手下的鹰派Bolton和正在和土豆闹别扭的土著女司法部长的杰作,既然出手了,土豆只能走司法程序,最后还是靠拜登给干预模糊地交换了。
 
我一直认为这事川普和土豆事先都不知情,川普手下的鹰派Bolton和正在和土豆闹别扭的土著女司法部长的杰作,既然出手了,土豆只能走司法程序,最后还是靠拜登给干预模糊地交换了。
If this is true, then PM is still too stupid to have controls on most important affairs
 
我一直认为这事川普和土豆事先都不知情,川普手下的鹰派Bolton和正在和土豆闹别扭的土著女司法部长的杰作,既然出手了,土豆只能走司法程序,最后还是靠拜登给干预模糊地交换了。

Jody Wilson-Raybould
 
If this is true, then PM is still too stupid to have controls on most important affairs
对下属对美国都没有完全的执政独立权,最后的交换显然不是正常的司法程序,而是黑社会绑架交换人质的本质,再怎么涂脂抹粉也掩盖不住,但是这个交换也必须由上方大国首肯。
 


Spavor blames fellow prisoner Kovrig for Chinese detention, alleges he was used for intelligence gathering

这事太意外了,麦克是不是在中国监狱被策反了?

中美关系一和稳,加拿大马上就自爆丑闻。
还说中国没有rule of law, "arbitrary"随便抓人了吗?

如果这事是真的,是不是土鳖更有理?

第一个环球邮报的链接打开后看不到内容。有没有人可以把内容贴出来?
 
第一个环球邮报的链接打开后看不到内容。有没有人可以把内容贴出来?

花钱订阅才能看全文。
 
后退
顶部