烂土豆公开秀他的弱智,无语。

呵呵,联邦法律保护罪犯,警察能做啥呢?知道被盗车子就在箱子里,也不能进去。毕竟车子丢了,有保险公司,人被打死了,警察工作量要增加好多的。
多伦多警察协会有些“五十步笑百步”。。。

难道不是他们让大家把车钥匙放门口的吧?

他们发这种批评联邦政策的推,只能说明他们的领导班子政治水平有问题,想出风头,最终会引来backfire。。。
我也觉得警察局作为一个公务部门理应远离政治,保持公正,他们参与政党之间争斗比土豆实行错误政策后果更严重。 土豆修法也知道要依照程序议会通过,毕竟还受制约。
当然一些无脑群众看着热闹,也不在乎这些
 
禁枪没错。假设土豆不禁枪,那罪犯们都不必麻烦从美国倒腾过来了,岂不是shootings要多得多?就算是普通人有枪,谁又会成天去酒吧带着枪,随时准备还击?
如果美国也禁枪,那就没这么多麻烦了。
警察们一个个除了开罚单啥也不干,要是大家都有枪,那警察更要自保,更是啥坏人也不管了。而且,动不动就先开枪为强,又要有多少冤魂。
犯罪率上升是土豆乱开移民绿灯添的乱,别眉毛胡子一把抓。
土豆虽不够总理智慧,也不是干啥都错。
 
土豆政策错了可以下台,警察不作为谁管啊?所以警察才是治安恶化的第一负责人
省、市有两级政府,警察不作为可以换人。
 
我也觉得警察局作为一个公务部门理应远离政治,保持公正,他们参与政党之间争斗比土豆实行错误政策后果更严重。 土豆修法也知道要依照程序议会通过,毕竟还受制约。
当然一些无脑群众看着热闹,也不在乎这些
这不是警察局,而是警察协会,类似工会组织。。。
 
我也觉得警察局作为一个公务部门理应远离政治,保持公正,他们参与政党之间争斗比土豆实行错误政策后果更严重。 土豆修法也知道要依照程序议会通过,毕竟还受制约。
当然一些无脑群众看着热闹,也不在乎这些
警察也是公民,有权利表达意见。这是加拿大,还不是土工国,连句真话都不让说了吗?
 
禁枪没错。假设土豆不禁枪,那罪犯们都不必麻烦从美国倒腾过来了,岂不是shootings要多得多?就算是普通人有枪,谁又会成天去酒吧带着枪,随时准备还击?
如果美国也禁枪,那就没这么多麻烦了。
警察们一个个除了开罚单啥也不干,要是大家都有枪,那警察更要自保,更是啥坏人也不管了。而且,动不动就先开枪为强,又要有多少冤魂。
犯罪率上升是土豆乱开移民绿灯添的乱,别眉毛胡子一把抓。
土豆虽不够总理智慧,也不是干啥都错。
土豆子是把人家里的枪都收缴了,那小偷强盗还不入室抢劫,也太不配合土豆了吧。
 
警察也是公民,有权利表达意见。这是加拿大,还不是土工国,连句真话都不让说了吗?
When a uniformed, on-duty police officer speaks to the public, they are a mouthpiece of/are representing the Police Department of that community. The Community is comprised of people of differing political views, religions, sexual orientations, etc. etc. If a Police Department is thought to make an endorsement of a Political Figure’s candidacy, utter a political opinion, recommend a specific business or product, etc., they are immediately alienating other parts of the community. The Police (are supposed to) serve every member of the community equally. Making the police department, as an Agency appear to have bias can poison the perception Jurors may have when considering whether the Defendant is a “bad guy” or if, by simple virtue of a police officer working for a department where bias favoring a political party (or race) the officer might have had OTHER reasons to accuse a particular client. The police need to avoid all of that… doing otherwise can cause the officer to undergo discipline or even termination from their employment as a police officer.

(NOTE: Police Unions are not associated with the Agencies for which the Officer-members work. There is no problem for a Union to make endorsements… which, though I am a member of a Police Union, do not think is appropriate, especially when my personal political view conflicts with what the union of which I am a member has taken. It’s the same problem).
 
When a uniformed, on-duty police officer speaks to the public, they are a mouthpiece of/are representing the Police Department of that community. The Community is comprised of people of differing political views, religions, sexual orientations, etc. etc. If a Police Department is thought to make an endorsement of a Political Figure’s candidacy, utter a political opinion, recommend a specific business or product, etc., they are immediately alienating other parts of the community. The Police (are supposed to) serve every member of the community equally. Making the police department, as an Agency appear to have bias can poison the perception Jurors may have when considering whether the Defendant is a “bad guy” or if, by simple virtue of a police officer working for a department where bias favoring a political party (or race) the officer might have had OTHER reasons to accuse a particular client. The police need to avoid all of that… doing otherwise can cause the officer to undergo discipline or even termination from their employment as a police officer.

(NOTE: Police Unions are not associated with the Agencies for which the Officer-members work. There is no problem for a Union to make endorsements… which, though I am a member of a Police Union, do not think is appropriate, especially when my personal political view conflicts with what the union of which I am a member has taken. It’s the same problem).
确实从未发生,也不该发生,但还是发生,不都是土豆子的倒行逆施突破底线的结果吗?
 
禁枪没错。假设土豆不禁枪,那罪犯们都不必麻烦从美国倒腾过来了,岂不是shootings要多得多?就算是普通人有枪,谁又会成天去酒吧带着枪,随时准备还击?
如果美国也禁枪,那就没这么多麻烦了。
警察们一个个除了开罚单啥也不干,要是大家都有枪,那警察更要自保,更是啥坏人也不管了。而且,动不动就先开枪为强,又要有多少冤魂。
犯罪率上升是土豆乱开移民绿灯添的乱,别眉毛胡子一把抓。
土豆虽不够总理智慧,也不是干啥都错。
美国那边基本没可能改变,人家的枪文化就是立国之本。
加拿大这边涉枪犯罪都是黑枪,你要是知道相关法律。就会知道普通人根本不允许别着一把手枪在街上到处跑。也没可能在街上随手拿出枪来自卫。你在公共场所把枪拿出来比你在商店零元购罪还重得多。
 
禁枪没错。假设土豆不禁枪,那罪犯们都不必麻烦从美国倒腾过来了,岂不是shootings要多得多?就算是普通人有枪,谁又会成天去酒吧带着枪,随时准备还击?
如果美国也禁枪,那就没这么多麻烦了。
警察们一个个除了开罚单啥也不干,要是大家都有枪,那警察更要自保,更是啥坏人也不管了。而且,动不动就先开枪为强,又要有多少冤魂。
犯罪率上升是土豆乱开移民绿灯添的乱,别眉毛胡子一把抓。
土豆虽不够总理智慧,也不是干啥都错。

您太逗了。您应该先去了解一下被烂土豆禁了的手枪的购买登记程序,黑帮和罪犯再傻点,也不会去注册枪牌然后买一把登记在册的手枪,然后出门打两枪。真这样那警察肯定最高兴了,枪案一出,立马就知道哪把枪了,哈哈哈。
 
您太逗了。您应该先去了解一下被烂土豆禁了的手枪的购买登记程序,黑帮和罪犯再傻点,也不会去注册枪牌然后买一把登记在册的手枪,然后出门打两枪。真这样那警察肯定最高兴了,枪案一出,立马就知道哪把枪了,哈哈哈。
照你这么说美国的枪案应该少才对。
 
照你这么说美国的枪案应该少才对。
美国枪击案大都发生在民主党严格控制枪支的地方,而当地甩锅的理由和你的也很类似,这些犯罪的枪支是从外州偷偷运送来的。
 
美国枪击案大都发生在民主党严格控制枪支的地方,而当地甩锅的理由和你的也很类似,这些犯罪的枪支是从外州偷偷运送来的。
你可真会扣帽子。
 
美国枪击案大都发生在民主党严格控制枪支的地方,而当地甩锅的理由和你的也很类似,这些犯罪的枪支是从外州偷偷运送来的。
瞎说。。。

德州小学枪击案发生在民主党控制的地方?

密歇根学校枪击案的枪是家长合法购买给孩子的礼物。。。

你也找个例子证明一下你的“理论”。。。
 
后退
顶部