metropolis
本站元老
- 注册
- 2010-12-10
- 消息
- 10,055
- 荣誉分数
- 2,111
- 声望点数
- 373
Google 翻译：
马斯克希望美国退出北约。多亏了马可·卢比奥，这要困难得多。
可能会有一场法律斗争。
根据卢比奥倡导的 2023 年法律，任何北约撤军都需要获得美国参议院三分之二的批准或国会的单独法案。鉴于许多共和党议员仍然是北约的坚定支持者，特朗普极不可能获得如此多的多数票。
法律学者表示，这可能不是最后决定；特朗普可以简单地无视法律。他的白宫暗示，国会对联邦资金支出的另一项限制是违宪的。
在这种情况下，法律斗争可能会诉诸美国最高法院。从历史上看，司法部门不愿介入各部门之间的纠纷。人们还担心立法者是否能够达到诉讼资格的门槛，即首先具备提起此类诉讼的合法能力。
在美国不完全撤军的情况下，还有其他方法可以破坏北约。
Elon Musk has said it is time to leave NATO. As a US senator, Marco Rubio made it harder for presidents to pull the US out of the alliance. Getty Images
Legal scholars have said that may not be the last word; Trump could simply ignore the law. His White House has suggested that a different congressional restriction related to spending federal funds is unconstitutional.
In such an event, a legal fight could go up to the US Supreme Court. Historically, the judiciary is reticent to get involved in disputes between branches. There are also concerns about whether lawmakers would reach the threshold of standing, the legal ability to bring such a suit in the first place.
Absent a full US withdrawal, there are other ways to undermine NATO.
www.businessinsider.com
Published March 3, 2025 6:18pm EST
www.foxnews.com
马斯克希望美国退出北约。多亏了马可·卢比奥，这要困难得多。
可能会有一场法律斗争。
根据卢比奥倡导的 2023 年法律，任何北约撤军都需要获得美国参议院三分之二的批准或国会的单独法案。鉴于许多共和党议员仍然是北约的坚定支持者，特朗普极不可能获得如此多的多数票。
法律学者表示，这可能不是最后决定；特朗普可以简单地无视法律。他的白宫暗示，国会对联邦资金支出的另一项限制是违宪的。
在这种情况下，法律斗争可能会诉诸美国最高法院。从历史上看，司法部门不愿介入各部门之间的纠纷。人们还担心立法者是否能够达到诉讼资格的门槛，即首先具备提起此类诉讼的合法能力。
在美国不完全撤军的情况下，还有其他方法可以破坏北约。
Musk wants the US to leave NATO. Thanks to Marco Rubio, that's a lot harder.
Brent D. GriffithsElon Musk has said it is time to leave NATO. As a US senator, Marco Rubio made it harder for presidents to pull the US out of the alliance. Getty Images
- Elon Musk said he agreed that the US should leave NATO.
- Before he became the secretary of state, Marco Rubio made such a move harder.
- Congress passed a law requiring a vote to approve any US withdrawal.
There could be a legal fight on the horizon
Under the 2023 law championed by Rubio, any NATO withdrawal requires either the approval of two-thirds of the US Senate or a separate act of Congress. Given that many GOP lawmakers remain staunch NATO backers, it's extremely unlikely Trump could muster such a large majority.Legal scholars have said that may not be the last word; Trump could simply ignore the law. His White House has suggested that a different congressional restriction related to spending federal funds is unconstitutional.
In such an event, a legal fight could go up to the US Supreme Court. Historically, the judiciary is reticent to get involved in disputes between branches. There are also concerns about whether lawmakers would reach the threshold of standing, the legal ability to bring such a suit in the first place.
Absent a full US withdrawal, there are other ways to undermine NATO.
Musk wants the US to leave NATO. Thanks to Marco Rubio, that's a lot harder.
In 2023, Congress passed a law that would require any president to seek approval before the US could leave NATO.
www.businessinsider.com
'AmerExit'? Republicans push for US to leave NATO amid stalled Ukraine peace negotiations
'What should we call the movement?'
By Diana Stancy Fox NewsPublished March 3, 2025 6:18pm EST
'AmerExit'? Republicans push for US to leave NATO amid stalled Ukraine peace negotiations
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, floated several names, including "AmerExit," as he launches a push to withdraw the U.S. from NATO.
