大而美法案窃贫济富,数据显示原来美国穷人那么穷

billwanhua

本站元老
注册
2005-07-07
消息
16,722
荣誉分数
5,489
声望点数
373

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” would reduce income by 2.9% (about $700) per year for the bottom 20% of households, according to the Yale analysis. These households have an income of less than $13,350, it said.

The massive bill would raise income by 2.2% ($5,700) per year for the top 20%, who have incomes of more than roughly $120,000, the study found.

一看吓一跳,最底层20%的家庭收入低于$13,350, 这是家庭收入,这么低在美国生活不可想象,应该生活状况跟中国那些低保户差不多。
 

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” would reduce income by 2.9% (about $700) per year for the bottom 20% of households, according to the Yale analysis. These households have an income of less than $13,350, it said.

The massive bill would raise income by 2.2% ($5,700) per year for the top 20%, who have incomes of more than roughly $120,000, the study found.

一看吓一跳,最底层20%的家庭收入低于$13,350, 这是家庭收入,这么低在美国生活不可想象,应该生活状况跟中国那些低保户差不多。
估计这法案通过的可能性很大,几位共和党的反对者似乎不很坚定。

收入是一方面,加拿大和美国物价可是比中国高多了。
 
不信这个报道,谷歌了一下:

加拿大:

In Canada, the bottom 20% of family incomes (also known as the first income quintile) earns an average of $31,604 per year after-tax, according to The Measure of a Plan. This group also experiences negative cash flow, meaning their spending exceeds their income.

美国:

in the U.S., the bottom 20% of families, also known as the lowest income quintile, typically earn below $28,000 annually. This group represents those with the lowest household incomes, with the lowest 10% earning less than $15,700. The income distribution in the US is highly unequal, with the bottom 20% earning a small fraction of the total income compared to higher income groups.


谷歌说“typically earn below $28,000 ”, 低于$28,000,也可能是报道中的$13,350。
相比美国,加拿大穷人可能更好,税后$31,604,关键医疗不要钱,教育便宜
 
最后编辑:
估计这法案通过的可能性很大,几位共和党的反对者似乎不很坚定。

收入是一方面,加拿大和美国物价可是比中国高多了。
没法比,中国应该80%收入低于$13,350
 
通过前不是可以做 amendments 吗?不断辩论,修改直到所有议员都赞同。from ugly becomes a real beautiful one. 🤗
 
美国穷人生活会更加艰难,给低收入人士的医疗,食品补助要大幅减少了,然后拿这些钱去给富人及其公司减税,美国是极致,纯粹的资本主义社会。

A large part of funding for President Donald Trump’s second-term agenda would come from cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid, the health care program for lower-income Americans and those with disabilities, and SNAP, which helps millions of lower-income Americans buy groceries every month.

The bill passed by the House makes around $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid. About 10.9 million people could lose their coverage over the next 10 years, according to Wednesday’s estimate by the Congressional Budget Office.

The SNAP cuts total an estimated $230 billion over 10 years.
 
美国穷人生活会更加艰难,给低收入人士的医疗,食品补助要大幅减少了,然后拿这些钱去给富人及其公司减税,美国是极致,纯粹的资本主义社会。

A large part of funding for President Donald Trump’s second-term agenda would come from cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid, the health care program for lower-income Americans and those with disabilities, and SNAP, which helps millions of lower-income Americans buy groceries every month.

The bill passed by the House makes around $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid. About 10.9 million people could lose their coverage over the next 10 years, according to Wednesday’s estimate by the Congressional Budget Office.

The SNAP cuts total an estimated $230 billion over 10 years.
这么贫穷的美国,每年数百万人冒着生命危险偷渡入境,打黑工的有什么医疗食品福利?
某些人眼里的地狱是别人的天堂。如果有工作能力不干,要让别人养,光荣吗?
美国失业率一直在4%左右,实际上失业率低于5%,会有大量雇主找不到劳工。
 
这么贫穷的美国,每年数百万人冒着生命危险偷渡入境,打黑工的有什么医疗食品福利?
某些人眼里的地狱是别人的天堂。如果有工作能力不干,要让别人养,光荣吗?
美国失业率一直在4%左右,实际上失业率低于5%,会有大量雇主找不到劳工。
没看懂你想说什么。说穷人可能不合适,英文原文是低收入,low income 的人/家庭享受的医疗,食品补贴会大幅削减,到底多少是 low income, 我也不知道,low income 的人不是不工作,而是负担不起美国昂贵的医疗费用。
 
最低工资$7.25/小时,在美国大多数州是常态。。。
 
没看懂你想说什么。说穷人可能不合适,英文原文是低收入,low income 的人/家庭享受的医疗,食品补贴会大幅削减,到底多少是 low income, 我也不知道,low income 的人不是不工作,而是负担不起美国昂贵的医疗费用。
这个我同意
 
都觉得反对没用,这没准是“不妨给川总再加上一根稻草”,加速坏东西被抛弃也算积德。
 
都觉得反对没用,这没准是“不妨给川总再加上一根稻草”,加速坏东西被抛弃也算积德。
也是一计,老板布置工作如果不合适,我一般不直接反对,以最快速度完成,就可以看见结果了。
 
后退
顶部