CTV 最新消息:PP的一个MP 叛变了,有可能加入自由党

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 LEAP
  • 开始时间 开始时间
保守党有无人材那得看跟谁比。如果烂土豆还在台上,那保守党内遍地都是人材,随便拿一个都比烂土豆强。现在卡尼在台上,有没有人材就难以比较了,还得再看看。
土豆作恶的时候卡泥在干嘛?自由粉不支持吗,还是自由粉天生党性极强,明知土豆是坨屎,但为了不输给pp,也要大口咽下,同时还要到网上来吧唧嘴巴,哈哈。
 
很容易把国人社区联系起,不一定对海华有啥好
 
这种情况应该重选。很多人都是因为他的党才投票给他的。
根源在于加拿大奇葩的选举制度,选民搞不清到底在选什么,民主了个啥。
 
Screenshot 2025-12-13 at 5.57.08 PM.webp
 
Just 7 hours ago the petition calling for Michael Ma’s resignation was only at 5000 signatures. It’s now over 20,000The people are speaking, will he listen? Keep pressure on this traitor.
Screenshot 2025-12-13 at 6.05.29 PM.webp
x
 
呵呵,自由粉歇菜吧,自由党这次在桌子底下用见不得人的方式收买一个叛徒,只会让支持pp的更团结用更极端的方式支持pp,对整个国家不是好事。

自由党人告诉这 叛逃者,让他们把离开党的责任归咎于PP。
而就在八个月前,正是这些人欣然接受了皮埃尔的竞选纲领并赢得了选举。

人们没有意识到,这是一个精心策划的阴谋,目的是操纵舆论,让人们认为PP不应该担任保守党领袖。
 
In parliamentary systems like Canada’s, an MP “crossing the floor” (switching parties while keeping their seat) is allowed because of how representation is defined.

Here are the main reasons 👇

1. MPs are elected​

  • On the ballot, voters technically elect a person, not a party.
  • Parties are politically important, but they don’t own the seat under Canadian law.
  • Once elected, an MP is free to change party affiliation—or sit as an independent.

2. Parliamentary tradition emphasizes​

  • Canada follows the Westminster parliamentary tradition (from the UK).
  • Historically, MPs are meant to:
    • Act according to conscience
    • Respond to new information
    • Represent their constituents’ interests, even if party views change
Forcing re-elections would weaken that independence.

3. No constitutional or legal requirement for re-election​

  • The Constitution and Canada Elections Act do not require a by-election when an MP changes parties.
  • A by-election is only mandatory if:
    • The MP resigns
    • The seat becomes vacant (death, disqualification, etc.)

4. Practical and stability reasons​

Requiring re-elections every time an MP changed parties would:
  • Be expensive and frequent
  • Destabilize Parliament
  • Allow party leaders (not voters) to indirectly force elections

5. Political accountability still exists​

Even though it’s legal:
  • Floor crossing is often politically controversial
  • Voters can punish the MP in the next general election
  • Some MPs choose to resign voluntarily and seek a fresh mandate—but this is a choice, not a rule

Summary​

Floor crossing is allowed because:
  • MPs hold seats personally
  • Parliamentary systems prioritize MP independence
  • The law does not require re-election
  • Accountability is enforced at the next election, not immediately
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的