卡尼得86%是到场人,还是全体自由党人投票?无聊,幼稚。
这次是只有去了现场的投票,不喜欢不支持屁屁的怎么会浪费时间跑去现场? 这种作弊太低级了。
上次推倒呕吐,就是给所有党员发了信,每人都可以回复。
无聊,幼稚。
多谢指教。这次是只有去了现场的投票,不喜欢不支持屁屁的怎么会浪费时间跑去现场? 这种作弊太低级了。
上次推倒呕吐,就是给所有党员发了信,每人都可以回复。
全体的,只要注册自由党就可以投,可以网上投票卡尼得86%是到场人,还是全体自由党人投票?
| Feature | Leadership Review | Leadership Election |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Keep or remove leader | Choose a new leader |
| Trigger | Convention / post-election | Vacancy or failed review |
| Voters | Delegates only | All party members |
| Candidates | One (current leader) | Many |
| Outcome | Stay or go | New leader |
If you want, I can also explain what percentage a Conservative leader usually needs to survive a review, or give real examples from past CPC leaders.“The leader will face a review, not an election.”
无聊,幼稚。
这次是只有去了现场的投票,不喜欢不支持屁屁的怎么会浪费时间跑去现场? 这种作弊太低级了。
上次推倒呕吐,就是给所有党员发了信,每人都可以回复。
---------------------------
The party has released a statement on the result — confirming the final tally was 87.4 per cent in support of Poilievre's leadership.
They say a Big Four accounting firm was retained to count the ballots cast.
"In an overwhelming majority, Conservative delegates voted at the national convention to forgo a leadership review and in support of Pierre Poilievre as their party’s Leader," the short statement reads.
-------------------------------
A party spokesperson tells me 2,558 ballots were cast in this leadership review election. That's a 95 per cent turnout.
We just spoke to Sebastian Skamski, Poilievre's former spokesperson, for some initial reaction. He's even more definitive than Outhouse that this sort of result will quiet the naysayers and put to bed the idea of any more MPs defecting to the Liberals.
"I think it's a very clear message that the party is united behind him," Skamski said.
Of course, I've also heard from some disaffected Conservatives that a result this strong could also make some Poilievre-sceptic MPs look around and wonder whether they still have a home in this party if the leader has such a strong endorsement from members.
---------------------------
该党已就选举结果发表声明,确认最终计票结果显示,87.4%的选民支持博利耶夫的领导。
提名,选举委员会聘用了四大会计师事务所之一来清点选票。
简短声明中写道:“选举代表党在全国代表大会上以压倒性多数投票放弃决定领导层审查,并支持埃尔皮·波利耶夫担任该党领袖。”
-------------------------------
一位党内接下来告诉我,本次领导层改选共投出2558张选票,投票率达到95%。
我们刚刚采访了博利耶夫的前任塞巴斯蒂安·斯卡姆斯基,了解他的初步反应。他比奥特豪斯更加肯定地说,这样的结果将让反对者闭嘴,并彻底打消更多物理学倒戈加入自由党的念头。
“我认为这非常明确地表明,全党团结在他周围,”斯卡姆斯基说。
当然,我也从一些心怀不满的保守党人士那里听说,如此强劲的选举结果也可能让一些对博利耶夫持怀疑态度的科学家们开始反思,如果党魁得到党员如此强烈的支持,他们是否还能在这个党内找到立足之地。
大家都是乡里乡亲, 冬天不出门借CFC的宝地扎个堆儿、聊个大天儿。。。劳驾您别大口啐别人好不好?您瞧瞧人家瑞文老板,有没有随地吐痰过?更别说大口啐人了。
多谢指教。
党员认同的是政党政见?还是个人崇拜?如果我是个积极参政的保守主义者,我会参加保守党。如果我反对博励志,我会发声、会投票反对。这次不是选举党领,而是review, 就是党内审查挑毛病。没听说他们挑了博励志啥毛病啊?
您说博励治作弊,根据是啥?这次表决的程序有违反保守党党内民主制度、先例吗?
我不熟悉政治,希望内行的人给科普一下
要说无聊+幼稚+骗韭菜,谁又能比得过Liberal,比得过小土豆呢?哈哈哈,不好意思,我没说你无聊。我是说现在的把持保守党的这伙人无聊,幼稚,骗韭菜。上次他们要搞掉呕吐,所以全体党员投票,这次他们和屁屁一伙,所以现场投票。 做就做吧,保守党员其实大多明白这就是演戏给韭菜看,还要把得票率说出来,丢人啊,难怪屁屁大选老窝都丢,他们这伙人还不觉得丢人。
支持Pp是不是给报销路费和餐费啊?无聊,幼稚。
这次是只有去了现场的投票,不喜欢不支持屁屁的怎么会浪费时间跑去现场? 这种作弊太低级了。
上次推倒呕吐,就是给所有党员发了信,每人都可以回复。
保粉还内讧了?以保粉之名,行保黑之实。就抹黑保守党和PP而言,你这样的保粉功不可没。