[转贴] 联邦大选三党与华人的“面子”

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 larry
  • 开始时间 开始时间

larry

新手上路
注册
2002-03-09
消息
555
荣誉分数
0
声望点数
0
枫樵:联邦大选三党与华人的“面子”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
期数: 滚动新闻

联邦大选在即。投谁的票,是个利益问题,也是给谁个“面子”的问题。许多平日不太关心政治或讨厌政治的朋友,现在也问,三大党我都不了解或者不喜欢,到底该投那一个?总不能抛硬币来决定吧。

笔者说心里话,也有些困惑。从经验和舆论看来,加拿大的三大政党好象都不怎么样,个个都在哗众取宠,笼络人心。华人如何决定自己该投谁的票,真的很难。这里,不妨从华人的“面子”来思考一番,该投谁的票,或许可以豁然开朗。

自由党经常给华人“面子”,但说得多,做得少,或者不做

许多年来,自由党联邦国会议员们与华人社区还是讲“面子”的,场面上非常过得去。逢年过节,大小活动,几乎有请必到,来了就热情洋溢地发表演讲,讲得华人心头发热。可是,实际上,很少为华人办实事。从老移民的“人头税”问题,到大陆新移民的普通话安置就业、社区服务资源问题,历史上不合理的平不了,现时不到位的总还是零。

不管怎么说,自由党一向看重华人选票,愿意与华人和新移民为友,这一点是不含糊的。

保守党经常不给华人“面子”,不理会华人需要,不说也不做

保守党在安省执政时,华人社区最受冷落。主要华人团体与保守党政要之间,几乎没有来往。新移民社团更是上不了保守党政府的台面,中医立法、中文教育、移民服务等华人社区关心的事,保守党从来不当回事,不理也不做。许多华人社区活动,请都请不到保守党政要,常常搞得华人很没“面子”。

保守党政要眼里基本没有华人,很少关心华人社区的需要。由于在华人社区人脉最不佳,导致去年省选华人社区一风吹,几乎清一色挺自由党。吃了自作自受的苦头,保守党似乎并没什么进步,华人社区里,还是很少见到保守党要人的面。

新民主党经常让华人丢“面子”,与中国移民社群形如水火

新民主党表面上什么都关心,可是在联邦层面说了不算,不解决问题。更要命的是,党魁党太有很强的“逢中必反”色彩。凡是中国政府反对的,新民主党都坚决支持,如推动市政府立法搞多伦多市的“****大法日”,拉着市长纪念“六四”,支持达赖和“西藏独立”等等,很象香港民主派的政治倾向刮到多伦多,经常弄得中国移民社群神经紧张,“面子”上过不去。这些活动,如果鼓捣到国会,通过若干针对中国政府的政治议案,影响两国友好关系,华人社区的日子就更麻烦多多了。

众多华人侨领在唐人街支持自由党余欣龙连任,内里原因就是一个怕字。华人社区怕新民主党把“逢中必反”搞到联邦国会,丢不起祖国的“面子”是一回事,社区此后无宁日,华人利益受损,后果就惨了。

票总是要投的,要用脑子,最好别用投硬币来决定

多年的加拿大政治生活经验,特别是去年省选、市选的经验,已经告诉公众,对三大党的政纲和竞选承诺,不必太天真浪漫信以为真。大选投票,最终要看谁上台对自己更有利。从华人社区和个人利害关系来决断,比根据竞选政纲和承诺来决断,更为理智和实际。

如果您真的非常讨厌所有的政党,不能决断到底该投谁一票,那么,投硬币决断也未尝不可,因为投票总比放弃您的公民选举权要好些。只要您参政,不给您办事,不给您“面子”,或者让您“丢面子”的,都会对您刮目相待:“华人到时候也会投票呀!”随着新移民和少年长大成人数量的增长,这七八十万张选票每年还会再添几万。政客们会再小视我们吗。

去投票吧,为了华人的“面子”,也为您和您的家庭、您的社区。(枫樵)
 
最初由 larry 发布
枫樵:联邦大选三党与华人的“面子”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
期数: 滚动新闻

联邦大选在即。投谁的票,是个利益问题,也是给谁个“面子”的问题。许多平日不太关心政治或讨厌政治的朋友,现在也问,三大党我都不了解或者不喜欢,到底该投那一个?总不能抛硬币来决定吧。

笔者说心里话,也有些困惑。从经验和舆论看来,加拿大的三大政党好象都不怎么样,个个都在哗众取宠,笼络人心。华人如何决定自己该投谁的票,真的很难。这里,不妨从华人的“面子”来思考一番,该投谁的票,或许可以豁然开朗。

自由党经常给华人“面子”,但说得多,做得少,或者不做

许多年来,自由党联邦国会议员们与华人社区还是讲“面子”的,场面上非常过得去。逢年过节,大小活动,几乎有请必到,来了就热情洋溢地发表演讲,讲得华人心头发热。可是,实际上,很少为华人办实事。从老移民的“人头税”问题,到大陆新移民的普通话安置就业、社区服务资源问题,历史上不合理的平不了,现时不到位的总还是零。

不管怎么说,自由党一向看重华人选票,愿意与华人和新移民为友,这一点是不含糊的。

保守党经常不给华人“面子”,不理会华人需要,不说也不做

保守党在安省执政时,华人社区最受冷落。主要华人团体与保守党政要之间,几乎没有来往。新移民社团更是上不了保守党政府的台面,中医立法、中文教育、移民服务等华人社区关心的事,保守党从来不当回事,不理也不做。许多华人社区活动,请都请不到保守党政要,常常搞得华人很没“面子”。

保守党政要眼里基本没有华人,很少关心华人社区的需要。由于在华人社区人脉最不佳,导致去年省选华人社区一风吹,几乎清一色挺自由党。吃了自作自受的苦头,保守党似乎并没什么进步,华人社区里,还是很少见到保守党要人的面。

新民主党经常让华人丢“面子”,与中国移民社群形如水火

新民主党表面上什么都关心,可是在联邦层面说了不算,不解决问题。更要命的是,党魁党太有很强的“逢中必反”色彩。凡是中国政府反对的,新民主党都坚决支持,如推动市政府立法搞多伦多市的“****大法日”,拉着市长纪念“六四”,支持达赖和“西藏独立”等等,很象香港民主派的政治倾向刮到多伦多,经常弄得中国移民社群神经紧张,“面子”上过不去。这些活动,如果鼓捣到国会,通过若干针对中国政府的政治议案,影响两国友好关系,华人社区的日子就更麻烦多多了。

众多华人侨领在唐人街支持自由党余欣龙连任,内里原因就是一个怕字。华人社区怕新民主党把“逢中必反”搞到联邦国会,丢不起祖国的“面子”是一回事,社区此后无宁日,华人利益受损,后果就惨了。

票总是要投的,要用脑子,最好别用投硬币来决定

多年的加拿大政治生活经验,特别是去年省选、市选的经验,已经告诉公众,对三大党的政纲和竞选承诺,不必太天真浪漫信以为真。大选投票,最终要看谁上台对自己更有利。从华人社区和个人利害关系来决断,比根据竞选政纲和承诺来决断,更为理智和实际。

如果您真的非常讨厌所有的政党,不能决断到底该投谁一票,那么,投硬币决断也未尝不可,因为投票总比放弃您的公民选举权要好些。只要您参政,不给您办事,不给您“面子”,或者让您“丢面子”的,都会对您刮目相待:“华人到时候也会投票呀!”随着新移民和少年长大成人数量的增长,这七八十万张选票每年还会再添几万。政客们会再小视我们吗。

去投票吧,为了华人的“面子”,也为您和您的家庭、您的社区。(枫樵)

讨厌到说不上...就是懒的动脑子...或许在呆个一二十年,我再动动脑子...
跟我当初"看面相"选举."抓阄"选举的GP逻辑相同...非要我选,我只能这么做了...
 
最初由 larry 发布

对三大党的政纲和竞选承诺,不必太天真浪漫信以为真。大选投票,最终要看谁上台对自己更有利。从华人社区和个人利害关系来决断,比根据竞选政纲和承诺来决断,更为理智和实际。

有道理,去年俺投了C,今年要改成投L了。
好像L对咱有利点,虽然有点讨厌麻田。
 
今天收到这个。


Subject: Had enough ????




An interesting underground swell


Thought it was worth passing on !



My name is Alan Robberstad
I am a Canadian.
One voter out of millions of Canadian voters.

Paul Martin is no friend of mine.
Liberal governments have not made my life any better.
Liberal governments have made the future worse for my children.

Jean Chretien and the Liberal Party became Prime
Minister many years ago.
Guess who was the Liberal Finance Minister..... Paul
Martin... LEST WEFORGET

Since 1993:
(1) My taxes have increased.
(2) My family's share of the national debt has increased.
(3) My personal expenses have increased.
(4) My waiting time to see a doctor has increased.
(5) My concerns for my family's safety have increased.
(6) My costs to educate my children have increased.
(7) Government interference in my life has increased.
(8) My personal debt has increased.
(9) My income has stayed more or less the same.
(10) My savings have decreased.
(11) The buying power of my dollar, in Canada, has decreased.
(12) The value of my dollar, in the U. S., has decreased.
(13) My trust of elected officials has decreased.
(14) My trust in the justice system has decreased.
(15 )My trust in the immigration system has decreased.
(16) My hope that a Liberal won't waste my tax dollars has
decreased.
(17 )My dreams for a better future for my kids, in Canada, have
disappeared.

That is my story since the Liberals came to power.

I am not voting for Paul Martin's Liberals.
I am voting against Paul Martin and his Liberal Party on June
28,
2004.

I am voting for Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party.

Do I like the Conservatives?
Not particularly...... I don't really like Politics.
I am not political by nature.
I am not passionate about politics.
I am a middle age guy (48).
I live in a small house on a fairly quiet street in Edmonton.
I have a wife, Kathy, and two children (ages 19 and 17).
I have no pets.
I am a middle class man.
I don't usually say too much.

Until now.

Now I am going to say something!

In 35 of the past 37 years, Canada has been ruled by:
(1) Pierre Trudeau - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(2) Brian Mulroney - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(3) Jean Chretien - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(4) And now we are going to vote for Paul Martin???? - a
multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec???

The leader of the Conservative party, Stephen Harper, is:
(1) Not a lawyer.
(2) Not a multi-millionaire.
(3) Not from Quebec.

Stephen Harper says that the Conservative party will:
(1) Reduce my taxes.
(2) Pay off the national debt as fast as they can.
(3) Shrink the size and influence of the federal government.

That's good enough for me.
I'm going to give the Conservative party a chance with my vote.

But wait!
Paul Martinis now saying the same thing.
My mother told me forty years ago:
"Fool me once - shame on you.
Fool me twice - shame on me!"

The Liberals have had 34 years to be financially responsible.
Remember, Jean Chretien was Trudeau's Finance Minister.
Remember also, Paul Martin was Jean Chretien's Finance Minister
These people have been raising my taxes for thirty four years.
They have been mis-spending my tax dollars for 34 years.

34 years!

And now Paul Martin says he'll stop taxing and spending.
No way.

Thank you for reading my story so far!

Why am I telling my story to you?

Although I feel alone, I know that I am not alone.
Your story may be similar to mine.
And you may also feel alone.
One small voter in the midst of millions of voters.

What can you and I do together to change things?

Here is my idea:
Lets you and I join up together.
Just you and I.
Together.
As a small team of two.

How can you and I fight a huge political machine?

You and I have two things that we can use:
(1) Our individual personal connections.
(2) The Internet.

The Internet is supposed to be this global zing tool, right?
Let's put it to use.

I have 27 Canadians in my personal e-mail address book.
I am sending this e-mail to each of them.

I'm asking you to do two things:
(1) Forward this e-mail to every Canadian in your own address
book.
(2) Vote against Paul Martin and the Liberal Party on June 28.

Vote for the Conservative candidate in your riding.

I have probably written this e-mail too late.
As I said I am not politically adroit.
I feel like Peter Finch, in the 1976 movie "Network",
when he shouted:
"I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

Please, forward the e-mail RIGHT NOW!!

As I type these last few words the voting begins in less than 18
days.
432 hours till voting begins.
I hope the Internet is as fast as some people claim it is.

This may not work.
This e-mail may "fizzle out" and go nowhere.
But you and I will have tried, won't we have?

My best wishes to you.
My best wishes to Canadians everywhere.

My thanks to David Stokes from Toronto
He actually wrote this just (5) days before the last federal
election in 2000.
Fool me once - shame on you.
Fool me twice - shame on me!"

Alan Robberstad
Edmonton, Alberta
June 10, 2004@ 3:00 p.m.
 
说得好,定了,投自由党,至少自由党还给咱们华人一点面子。
 
华人的选举权和移民权都是自由党争取来的。
世界上最宽容的多元文化社会也是这10年自由党苦心经营得来的。
华人应该投桃报李。
 
“最宽容的多元文化社会”有什么用?没有工作什么也不是


最初由 larry 发布
华人的选举权和移民权都是自由党争取来的。
世界上最宽容的多元文化社会也是这10年自由党苦心经营得来的。
华人应该投桃报李。
 
虽然讨厌马田,但觉的还是因该给L一些机会,C上台了就惨了。
 
最初由 stjoseph 发布
“最宽容的多元文化社会”有什么用?没有工作什么也不是

保守党就根本不欢迎你们移民。
 
当然要反移民了

这么多高学历的技术移民从大陆来,抢了我们的饭碗

最初由 SOSSOS 发布
保守党就根本不欢迎你们移民。
 
自由党已经干了十年了,还不够吗?

最初由 SOSSOS 发布
虽然讨厌马田,但觉的还是因该给L一些机会,C上台了就惨了。
 
Re: 当然要反移民了

其实真正有饭碗的一点不怕。最苦的是那些刚来的,发现上了当,进退两难,想把自由党选下去又没有投票权。


最初由 iloveu 发布
这么多高学历的技术移民从大陆来,抢了我们的饭碗

 
最初由 stjoseph 发布
自由党已经干了十年了,还不够吗?

你已经工作了十几年,还不够吗?
 
Re: Re: 当然要反移民了

最初由 stjoseph 发布
其实真正有饭碗的一点不怕。最苦的是那些刚来的,发现上了当,进退两难,想把自由党选下去又没有投票权。

C党则索性让你回中国。
 
后退
顶部