百家饭时代不再

[人在天涯]

最初由 渐渐 发布


and I have proof of the battle. :smokin:

裙子?

 

[oread]

What permission? It's already posted here.

最初由 Martin 发布


1 class..

PS: Did you ask for permission to use that pic?

 

[oread]

Is there a forum policy that I don't know about?

:blink:

 

[Martin]

I was talking about your logo, looks familiar

 

[oread]

ZT! I know that, the logo's cut from a posted photo in the forum, is it against forum rule?

Serious question, I really don't know, missed out on the "big day".

 

[人在天涯]

最初由 渐渐 发布
ZT! I know that, the logo's cut from a posted photo in the forum, is it against forum rule?

Serious question, I really don't know, missed out on the "big day".

I assume 即使是posted的照片,你要拿来做头像也要本人同意,这是common sense:blink:

 

[oread]

This is not common-sense, at least not common to me, maybe to "others".

No.1. Copy right of photo belongs to the photographer and not the person in the photo.
No.2. If that person disagrees to the photo, he/she should have voiced the discontentment to the photographer who posted the photo in the first place.
No.3. Dino won't mind, he's no NQ, I know him.

 

[人在天涯]

最初由 渐渐 发布
This is not common-sense, at least not common to me, maybe to "others".

No.1. Copy right of photo belongs to the photographer and not the person in the photo.
No.2. If that person disagrees to the photo, he/she should have voiced the discontentment to the photographer who posted the photo in the first place.
No.3. Dino won't mind, he's no NQ, I know him.

1.肖像权要大于copyright
2.他可以同意发帖子的人发一次,未必同意有人拿来当头像放得到处都是
3.你know不know him和要讨论的东西无关

 

[oread]

1. If a person agrees to post his/her photo, he/she already waived his/her 肖像权, THAT's common-sense.
2. There is a difference between 0 and 1, but no difference between 1 and 1 million, that's what original is all about.
3. I know him you JH ma?

 

[oread]

最初由 人在天涯 发布


1.肖像权要大于copyright
2.他可以同意发帖子的人发一次,未必同意有人拿来当头像放得到处都是
3.你know不know him和要讨论的东西无关

Green Apples jiu zhe logical thinking, fu le.

 

[人在天涯]

最初由 渐渐 发布
1. If a person agrees to post his/her photo, he/she already waived his/her 肖像权, THAT's common-sense.
2. There is a difference between 0 and 1, but no difference between 1 and 1 million, that's what original is all about.
3. I know him you JH ma?

哦,照你的common sense,我不能让别人post我的相片一次了
post一次就意味着别人可以任意使用了? does not make sense a!

你的第2点就是LM逻辑,NLM名不虚传

 

[oread]

OK, maybe I overesitmated the intelligance of a green apple le, let me put it into words that you can understand. To give you an example: Van Gogh's original sunflower paining would sell for over 10 million dollars at Sotheby's, but any reproduction of that painting can only be sold at a fraction of that price, agree?

That's the difference 0 and 1 and 1 million.

 

[Rabbit]

you men 2 wind le

 

[oread]

To answer your first question, you should go after the photographer, the person who posted your photo for the first time. I may be breaking the law of copy-right, but I'm not breaking the law of 肖像权, agree green apple?

 

[人在天涯]

最初由 渐渐 发布
OK, maybe I overesitmated the intelligance of a green apple le, let me put it into words that you can understand. To give you an example: Van Gogh's original sunflower paining would sell for over 10 million dollars at Sotheby's, but any reproduction of that painting can only be sold at a fraction of that price, agree?

That's the difference 0 and 1 and 1 million.

这和你拿他照片做头像有关系吗?