......Just to share......

[startrack]

我当时第一眼看到#6就觉得曝光很好，要是评估测光的话应是加了1/3-1/5的正补偿，很透。好奇之下，看了一下你的参数，居然是点测，觉得不可思议。你要是真的是对左边的衣服测的光，应该不是这种效果。
要是点测点和对焦点联动的话，应该是右边那位的牛仔裤上方的土地。把浅深色的土地曝光成18度灰（中性灰）就会是这种效果。
说多了，不好意思。（不是卖弄，只是有点病入膏荒了，曝光控制综合症。）

 

[siutang]

最初由 阿瓜 发布


This way, since the left guy was in black (sort of), the right guy was in white, the right guys's jacket was a little over-exposure. Don't you think?

I usually use matrix meter of D70 to deal with normal situation, it intends to be a little less-exposure, but 宁欠毋过嘛!

ya, I also think that the guy on right is a bit over, hehe
For this pic, I actually more interested at their poses and facal expression than the background.
I think you are so right that rather under than over, cuz we still can doing sth with it by using Photoshop or whatever when it was under. But personally (bad habit), I just not quite comfortable with pictures which are under exposure, bcos I love contrast ^_^ I tried the matrix meter before too, normally, it turns out fine for the whole thing; somehow, it happens that the background was fine, but the main object tens to be a bit under... ... headache

 

[siutang]

最初由 startrack 发布
我当时第一眼看到#6就觉得曝光很好，要是评估测光的话应是加了1/3-1/5的正补偿，很透。好奇之下，看了一下你的参数，居然是点测，觉得不可思议。你要是真的是对左边的衣服测的光，应该不是这种效果。
要是点测点和对焦点联动的话，应该是右边那位的牛仔裤上方的土地。把浅深色的土地曝光成18度灰（中性灰）就会是这种效果。
说多了，不好意思。（不是卖弄，只是有点病入膏荒了，曝光控制综合症。）

startrack兄?有真多了，that's the way we learn, hehe
可是你上面所嘱的，?我呃?初哥?真有?太深...不是很懂 >_<

不咿，?不要因?有?候我听不懂而不斤意?，我想跟你????? ^^

 

[阿瓜]

I don't know if you have read this post or not:

http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&forumid=9&threadid=308373