[公告] 对不起呀对不起

鸡蛋

新手上路
注册
2002-02-12
消息
1,278
荣誉分数
5
声望点数
0
i have no more time for this, so this is the last post

first, just wanna apologize to everyone who was offended by this and other post. It was an overreaction on my part. It was a bad week, and i was in the middle of another lawsuit anyway, so why not do two in one? After some research, I realize this guy is just a kid who happens to push the wrong buttons. This one is actually not worth my time and efforts . But still, I now realize that sending all those posts is an error on my judgement, especially put those negative threatening words regarding another individual.

Having said that, i'd like to say something in my defence:

1. the individual who provoked me should apologize as well. I understand controled myself better, but he should be partially liable as well. From the first time, he started talking, I have tried to control myself from uttering threat, but that morning I just lost it.

2. Interference leading to a loss of property value should be disencouraged. In any place of commerce, in order for orderly conduct, the type of behavior of downcalling the seller in their ad, without the expressed permission of the seller, shouldn't occur. Ebay system is a example of what should be done, the owner should have a ranking system, and only buyers who HAVE purchased from the seller can put in their rating. It's fair to base your opionion on actual past experience, but fair to base it on speculation.

3. "Freedom of speech" and "Right to post in a public forum" needs to be clearly differentiated. You can trash talk the seller to your friends, say they must think everyone's stupid, and they are fraudulent. That is your freedom and no one can stop you from that. But CFC is a public forum and when you signed up, and to be able to post here is a right, not a freedom. Any post in a pulic forum has the ability to influence, mislead, and misinform. The poster must realize that what they are saying is taken at face value, and be aware that to make an accusation that is based on unproven evidence is libel。

Again, sorry for wasting everyone and my own time.
 
就因为别人说了几句话就四处抓狂成这个样子, 心理承受能力有待提高啊
 
市场经济了,注意克服蒙一把就发财心态

报价要实事求是
 
老大啊,我真的觉得你太神经过敏了。任何产品销售广告打出去,肯定会有人评论的啊
你会说internet libel,那人家也有freedom of speech
一点小事就各个版面都发,有这个必要吗?
再说了,如果你是成年人,这个假,最好还是不要丢。
 
浪费你的时间
导致财产损失?

这个说法勉强不勉强阿?
上庭时间地点公布一下~我倒是很想看看这官司怎么打~~~hoho~~~支持支持~~~
 
我也想看。。。

官司一定要打呀,鸡蛋!

最初由 puppa 发布
浪费你的时间
导致财产损失?

这个说法勉强不勉强阿?
上庭时间地点公布一下~我倒是很想看看这官司怎么打~~~hoho~~~支持支持~~~
 
我以前卖车时,等了一个买家大半个月,给他的卖价是9千5.他找专家看过我的车后,最后说要8千包税才行.
我去车行TRAD IN了,车行给了我9千8,加上买新车抵的税,算是一万1千三百多.

之间好多人给我来电话,说我的车也就5千,7千,说多少的都有,比TRAD IN 都低
 
最初由 puppa 发布
浪费你的时间
导致财产损失?

这个说法勉强不勉强阿?
上庭时间地点公布一下~我倒是很想看看这官司怎么打~~~hoho~~~支持支持~~~

我也想看!!
 
小题大做,我看不见你的损失,到是看见你挣了不少回贴钱
 
时过多日
我气也消了

官司不打了
人家也就小P孩一个
大过年的
闹啥呢
 
最初由 regal 发布
就因为别人说了几句话就四处抓狂成这个样子, 心理承受能力有待提高啊

我是比较容易抓狂的那一类 :(
 
纯他妈的没事找事, 有病.

如上.
 
最初由 鸡蛋 发布


我是比较容易抓狂的那一类 :(


不是会写中文么?
在中文论坛里彪英文,你累不累呀你
 
最初由 鸡蛋 发布
i have no more time for this, so this is the last post

first, just wanna apologize to everyone who was offended by this and other post. It was an overreaction on my part. It was a bad week, and i was in the middle of another lawsuit anyway, so why not do two in one? After some research, I realize this guy is just a kid who happens to push the wrong buttons. This one is actually not worth my time and efforts . But still, I now realize that sending all those posts is an error on my judgement, especially put those negative threatening words regarding another individual.

Having said that, i'd like to say something in my defence:

1. the individual who provoked me should apologize as well. I understand controled myself better, but he should be partially liable as well. From the first time, he started talking, I have tried to control myself from uttering threat, but that morning I just lost it.

2. Interference leading to a loss of property value should be disencouraged. In any place of commerce, in order for orderly conduct, the type of behavior of downcalling the seller in their ad, without the expressed permission of the seller, shouldn't occur. Ebay system is a example of what should be done, the owner should have a ranking system, and only buyers who HAVE purchased from the seller can put in their rating. It's fair to base your opionion on actual past experience, but fair to base it on speculation.

3. "Freedom of speech" and "Right to post in a public forum" needs to be clearly differentiated. You can trash talk the seller to your friends, say they must think everyone's stupid, and they are fraudulent. That is your freedom and no one can stop you from that. But CFC is a public forum and when you signed up, and to be able to post here is a right, not a freedom. Any post in a pulic forum has the ability to influence, mislead, and misinform. The poster must realize that what they are saying is taken at face value, and be aware that to make an accusation that is based on unproven evidence is libel。

Again, sorry for wasting everyone and my own time.


还乱彪英文,态度一点都不成肯
 
我服了,会说中文就用中文,这又不是英文论坛,我们都知道你英文好,你不用再显了。多花点时间放在你那车上吧。
 
后退
顶部