向《环球邮报》表达华人抗议的倡议书
- 主题发起人 mamaomao
- 开始时间
这里需要每个华人的声音。
以下选录一些已经发出的抗议信：（但是我们知道，少量的抗议信是不会让环球邮报加以重视的）
第一篇 加拿大史维会多伦多王裕佳医生的
加拿大史维会多伦多王裕佳医生的力争之下，这家报纸做了些许的让步，同意刊登王医生的写得一份稿子作为special comment登在环球邮报5月10日的社论版。这份稿子的名字是《单靠语言是不够的It will take more than words》这是我们华人取得初步胜利，在一定程度上将使加拿大有机会知道历史真相，支持我们现在的反对日本军国主义的活动。但是《环球邮报》的这种做法，只具有些许象征性表态的意义，根本没有诚意来更正他们在那篇评论中的错误言论。这需要我们进一步行动起来要求他们更正错误表达歉意。
Commentary
Tuesday, May 10, 2005 Updated at 7:46 AM EDT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050510.wxcowong10/BNStory/specialComment/
It will take more than words
By JOSEPH WONG AND THEKLA LIT
People in the West are largely unaware of what the Japanese Imperial forces did to civilians and unarmed soldiers in countries Japan occupied between 1931 and 1945. And when discussing Japan's role in the Second World War, too many commentators, including The Globe and Mail editorialists, tend to cloud the issue with speculative views of current Sino-Japanese political tensions, and have missed the point that this is a matter of historical truth, justice and redress. It does not matter how many times Japanese prime ministers and foreign ministers have apologized to China, Korea, and other victimized countries because there is no national remorse for the unspeakable atrocities committed.
To the afflicted countries, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's latest apology at last month's Asian-African summit in Jakarta is the same as all previous apologies -- purely personal. It is intended to mollify or, worse, fool the Asian public and win support and admiration from Western media and politicians. Without an act of the Japanese parliament, the Diet, no one's apology is representative of the Japanese government, or of the people of Japan.
In order for a democratic country to express its true remorse, Japan's apology must minimally contain the following actions:
1. It must be based on a law duly enacted by the Japanese Diet, authorizing the prime minister and emperor to make a public apology to all the aggrieved nations;
2. The same enacted law must include an authorization for the government to compensate victims of Japanese aggression and atrocities, and a mechanism for determining the just compensation for the victims;
3. The law must also mandate a faithful collection, documentation, preservation, and distribution of the truths about Japanese aggression in the Asia-Pacific War;
4. It must also include a mandate that the textbooks in Japan reflect this chapter of history in perpetuity;
5. Denials of the Asian holocaust must be outlawed.
To date, the Diet has taken no such action. Mr. Koizumi merely replicated the apology statement issued by prime minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995, a statement considered strongest among all statements made since the end of the Second World War. However, Mr. Murayama made the personal apology only after he failed to persuade the Diet to enact an apology into law.
Even as Mr. Koizumi was making his apology in Jakarta, 80 members of the Diet, deliberately and defiantly visited the Yasukuni Shrine, where convicted war criminals are deified and where Japanese militarism is blatantly glorified. How would the world react if German parliamentarians paid tribute to Nazi war criminals?
The German parliament passed resolutions to redress Nazi Holocaust victims, outlaw Holocaust denials and compensate victims. Aren't the victims of the Asian holocaust entitled to similar treatment? Are they worthy only of empty words of apology and no redress by the Japanese Diet, even 60 years after the war? Aren't The Globe and Mail and others like it using double standards in this matter of justice?
The Japanese government has, for decades, through its textbook censoring system, been whitewashing the country's wars of aggression and its atrocities. Worse still, as recently as last month, the Japanese government further sanctioned history textbooks that gloss over the atrocities committed. These books glorify Japan's invasion of its neighbouring countries as an act of self-defence against the Western powers and a war of liberation that benefited the Asian people.
We have no doubt that Canadians, if properly informed, will be shocked by the unrepentant and unjust behaviour of Japanese postwar governments, and will not fail to recognize the difference between apology by individual government officials and apology and redress resolutions enacted by the Diet. Only through national remorse can Japan make reconciliation with its war victims and regain trust from the people of its neighbouring countries.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Wong, a Toronto physician, and Thekla Lit, an activist for Chinese redress, are co-chairs of the Canada Association for Learning and Preserving the History of WWII
以下选录一些已经发出的抗议信：（但是我们知道，少量的抗议信是不会让环球邮报加以重视的）
第一篇 加拿大史维会多伦多王裕佳医生的
加拿大史维会多伦多王裕佳医生的力争之下，这家报纸做了些许的让步，同意刊登王医生的写得一份稿子作为special comment登在环球邮报5月10日的社论版。这份稿子的名字是《单靠语言是不够的It will take more than words》这是我们华人取得初步胜利，在一定程度上将使加拿大有机会知道历史真相，支持我们现在的反对日本军国主义的活动。但是《环球邮报》的这种做法，只具有些许象征性表态的意义，根本没有诚意来更正他们在那篇评论中的错误言论。这需要我们进一步行动起来要求他们更正错误表达歉意。
Commentary
Tuesday, May 10, 2005 Updated at 7:46 AM EDT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050510.wxcowong10/BNStory/specialComment/
It will take more than words
By JOSEPH WONG AND THEKLA LIT
People in the West are largely unaware of what the Japanese Imperial forces did to civilians and unarmed soldiers in countries Japan occupied between 1931 and 1945. And when discussing Japan's role in the Second World War, too many commentators, including The Globe and Mail editorialists, tend to cloud the issue with speculative views of current Sino-Japanese political tensions, and have missed the point that this is a matter of historical truth, justice and redress. It does not matter how many times Japanese prime ministers and foreign ministers have apologized to China, Korea, and other victimized countries because there is no national remorse for the unspeakable atrocities committed.
To the afflicted countries, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's latest apology at last month's Asian-African summit in Jakarta is the same as all previous apologies -- purely personal. It is intended to mollify or, worse, fool the Asian public and win support and admiration from Western media and politicians. Without an act of the Japanese parliament, the Diet, no one's apology is representative of the Japanese government, or of the people of Japan.
In order for a democratic country to express its true remorse, Japan's apology must minimally contain the following actions:
1. It must be based on a law duly enacted by the Japanese Diet, authorizing the prime minister and emperor to make a public apology to all the aggrieved nations;
2. The same enacted law must include an authorization for the government to compensate victims of Japanese aggression and atrocities, and a mechanism for determining the just compensation for the victims;
3. The law must also mandate a faithful collection, documentation, preservation, and distribution of the truths about Japanese aggression in the Asia-Pacific War;
4. It must also include a mandate that the textbooks in Japan reflect this chapter of history in perpetuity;
5. Denials of the Asian holocaust must be outlawed.
To date, the Diet has taken no such action. Mr. Koizumi merely replicated the apology statement issued by prime minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995, a statement considered strongest among all statements made since the end of the Second World War. However, Mr. Murayama made the personal apology only after he failed to persuade the Diet to enact an apology into law.
Even as Mr. Koizumi was making his apology in Jakarta, 80 members of the Diet, deliberately and defiantly visited the Yasukuni Shrine, where convicted war criminals are deified and where Japanese militarism is blatantly glorified. How would the world react if German parliamentarians paid tribute to Nazi war criminals?
The German parliament passed resolutions to redress Nazi Holocaust victims, outlaw Holocaust denials and compensate victims. Aren't the victims of the Asian holocaust entitled to similar treatment? Are they worthy only of empty words of apology and no redress by the Japanese Diet, even 60 years after the war? Aren't The Globe and Mail and others like it using double standards in this matter of justice?
The Japanese government has, for decades, through its textbook censoring system, been whitewashing the country's wars of aggression and its atrocities. Worse still, as recently as last month, the Japanese government further sanctioned history textbooks that gloss over the atrocities committed. These books glorify Japan's invasion of its neighbouring countries as an act of self-defence against the Western powers and a war of liberation that benefited the Asian people.
We have no doubt that Canadians, if properly informed, will be shocked by the unrepentant and unjust behaviour of Japanese postwar governments, and will not fail to recognize the difference between apology by individual government officials and apology and redress resolutions enacted by the Diet. Only through national remorse can Japan make reconciliation with its war victims and regain trust from the people of its neighbouring countries.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Wong, a Toronto physician, and Thekla Lit, an activist for Chinese redress, are co-chairs of the Canada Association for Learning and Preserving the History of WWII
quote:
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
最初由 dajie 发布
怀疑是日本人出钱雇人写的，不过作为长期妖魔化中国的后果，他们这样写一点也不奇怪。西方媒体本身对共产党政权就有偏见，意识形态是水火不相容的，所以无论你做什末，在他们看来都是你不对，只要你不是资本主义国家你就永远不对。
所以这样的文章不理也罢。我只是觉得很多问题应该抛开意识形态的圈子，客观真实的来进行报道论述，不要任何事情都wear color glasses
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
这样的文章不理可不行。这是在加拿大，一个华人众多的地方。
我们应该知道 《环球邮报》在加拿大人中的影响力！
如果华人不理会，那么以后我们就无处向加拿大人表达我们的正义，我们将永远是吃了亏还受气的一个民族。
没有自己声音的民族和个人，是无希望无前途的民族和个人。
不是说我们好斗，而是事关于华人的大是大非。实际上，我们华人在海外一直做着良民和顺民，对当地社会贡献很多，可是索取并不多。
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
最初由 dajie 发布
怀疑是日本人出钱雇人写的，不过作为长期妖魔化中国的后果，他们这样写一点也不奇怪。西方媒体本身对共产党政权就有偏见，意识形态是水火不相容的，所以无论你做什末，在他们看来都是你不对，只要你不是资本主义国家你就永远不对。
所以这样的文章不理也罢。我只是觉得很多问题应该抛开意识形态的圈子，客观真实的来进行报道论述，不要任何事情都wear color glasses
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
这样的文章不理可不行。这是在加拿大，一个华人众多的地方。
我们应该知道 《环球邮报》在加拿大人中的影响力！
如果华人不理会，那么以后我们就无处向加拿大人表达我们的正义，我们将永远是吃了亏还受气的一个民族。
没有自己声音的民族和个人，是无希望无前途的民族和个人。
不是说我们好斗，而是事关于华人的大是大非。实际上，我们华人在海外一直做着良民和顺民，对当地社会贡献很多，可是索取并不多。
- 注册
- 2004-10-04
- 消息
- 4,626
- 荣誉分数
- 16
- 声望点数
- 148
它不是汉奸，是会写字的出卖灵魂的动物，不过就是写这种文章为了美金过活的动物，没必要理他，我上一页支持别人观点的话被他贬低为骂街，呵呵！我真的骂街了吗？骂街什么意思？我想那个sb是一点都解释不上来的！
我到了靖国神社 附图
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&forumid=99&threadid=379627
日本首相小泉参拜靖国神社之举颇得日本民众的支持。也许，不少人认为这是日本的宗教自由，日本人有权信仰死者。陈平原教授在《招魂》一文中写道：“在日本，‘灵魂信仰’古已有之，将死于非命的亡灵尊奉为神而祭祀之，这种想法很有‘人情味’。因其不分敌我，只要是死于战乱的人，一律供养，以慰其亡灵。”以明治维新为界，靖国神社的性质有了根本的改变。如果说在明治维新之前，作为一种民间信仰，靖国神社将“成者王侯”与“败者盗寇”一起祭祀，确实显示出日本古代文化中的某种“人情味”（如祭祀叛乱而死的西乡隆盛）；那么在明治维新之后，靖国神社便完全蜕变成为军国主义意识形态的马前卒。我在靖国神社及“游就馆”中看到的一切，绝非“宗教自由”那么简单。还是陈平原教分析得透彻：“靖国神社之突出‘为国捐躯’，使得这种‘已在国民的宗教意识中扎根的慰灵传统有了本质的改变’。此后，必须是效忠于天皇和大日本帝国的，才有资格享受祭祀。这种置幕府军队与外国士兵之死于不顾的‘招魂’，在推行天皇参拜和军国主义的同时，培养了民众的‘残忍心’──很难说这与太平洋战争期间日本军队在中国以及东南亚的暴行没有关系（参见村上重良《国家神道》第三章）。”我们必须洞悉靖国神社近代化的蜕变，方能驳斥某些日本政客辩称参拜乃“宗教自由”的谬论。
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&forumid=99&threadid=379627
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&forumid=99&threadid=379627
日本首相小泉参拜靖国神社之举颇得日本民众的支持。也许，不少人认为这是日本的宗教自由，日本人有权信仰死者。陈平原教授在《招魂》一文中写道：“在日本，‘灵魂信仰’古已有之，将死于非命的亡灵尊奉为神而祭祀之，这种想法很有‘人情味’。因其不分敌我，只要是死于战乱的人，一律供养，以慰其亡灵。”以明治维新为界，靖国神社的性质有了根本的改变。如果说在明治维新之前，作为一种民间信仰，靖国神社将“成者王侯”与“败者盗寇”一起祭祀，确实显示出日本古代文化中的某种“人情味”（如祭祀叛乱而死的西乡隆盛）；那么在明治维新之后，靖国神社便完全蜕变成为军国主义意识形态的马前卒。我在靖国神社及“游就馆”中看到的一切，绝非“宗教自由”那么简单。还是陈平原教分析得透彻：“靖国神社之突出‘为国捐躯’，使得这种‘已在国民的宗教意识中扎根的慰灵传统有了本质的改变’。此后，必须是效忠于天皇和大日本帝国的，才有资格享受祭祀。这种置幕府军队与外国士兵之死于不顾的‘招魂’，在推行天皇参拜和军国主义的同时，培养了民众的‘残忍心’──很难说这与太平洋战争期间日本军队在中国以及东南亚的暴行没有关系（参见村上重良《国家神道》第三章）。”我们必须洞悉靖国神社近代化的蜕变，方能驳斥某些日本政客辩称参拜乃“宗教自由”的谬论。
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&forumid=99&threadid=379627
- 注册
- 2004-10-04
- 消息
- 4,626
- 荣誉分数
- 16
- 声望点数
- 148
砸使馆是素质问题，中国问题重重的一个大原因就是人的素质不高！什么都能被政治化的你，想罢是你被戳到痛处了，只会将中国 等同 中共。你不是个政治犯就是个极端主义者，所以我没必要跟你嚼舌根！如果你不是我说的以上2种人，那么你动不动就将中国等同中共的举动只能解释为，你语文水平很差，素质问题！那你和那些砸使馆的人也是等同的。既然素质不见得比别人高就不要骂别人，因为你没这个资格！
有网友名为 Aguilera 给我 悄悄话说：
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
“你有完没完?
把那破贴＂向《环球邮报》表达华人的抗议的倡议书＂贴得到处都是！”
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
看来，我这个贴子，还是达到了一定目的。 让一些人迫不及待地 跳出来了。
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
别动不动就说＂华人＂，就你们几个人，就能代表华人？
嘴子撂得倒挺大．
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
看来，我发这个倡议这前，应该与有些人商量一下。一是检讨一下这是不是个滥贴子，二是看一看什么人是能代表了华人的，或者说应该问一句是不是在文章不能随便用“华人”这两个字需要事先有关人士批准。
补充一点，这个贴子是个人行为。不是象有些人说得“你们几个人 ”。
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
“你有完没完?
把那破贴＂向《环球邮报》表达华人的抗议的倡议书＂贴得到处都是！”
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
看来，我这个贴子，还是达到了一定目的。 让一些人迫不及待地 跳出来了。
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
别动不动就说＂华人＂，就你们几个人，就能代表华人？
嘴子撂得倒挺大．
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
看来，我发这个倡议这前，应该与有些人商量一下。一是检讨一下这是不是个滥贴子，二是看一看什么人是能代表了华人的，或者说应该问一句是不是在文章不能随便用“华人”这两个字需要事先有关人士批准。
补充一点，这个贴子是个人行为。不是象有些人说得“你们几个人 ”。
snowingcanada
知名会员
- 注册
- 2004-04-06
- 消息
- 97
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 116
抗议，坚绝抗议
相关推荐
