老贴啊，人之初，性本善还是本恶是无法印证的。因为要印证“人之初”性本善或本恶所需要的环境条件是无法达到的。因此，要讲人性就要先弄清楚人的本性。而在现实社会中要弄清楚人的本性就要结合各方面因素。后天所受教育是中性的，受教育的结果可能是帮了一个人，也可能是毁了一个人。表面上看，恶的人性是受价值观的影响而后天逐渐形成的，而人成长过程中对好多本能上的，如对生命，食物，财产等权力的维护，则是本能及与生具来的，如果在没有法律和社会道德的约束下，人会在对自身最根本利益的维护中充分展现出本性。客观上讲，做为个体上的人，这个本性非恶也非善，因此，要讲人的本性，就不适合讨论善恶。要讲“人之初”的本性，恐怕只有孔老夫子这样的圣人才能说的如此干脆。
[闲聊] 大家觉得人性本善还是人性本恶？
- 主题发起人 秣天の亻肉
- 开始时间
千古一帝
新手上路
- 注册
- 2004-12-29
- 消息
- 70
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
No Chinese input at work, bear my English writting please.
A human is just a live creature controled by nerves and brain. Do you think that your nerves are spiritually good or bad? No good, no bad. When you say good or bad, you are talking the behaviors in a group setting or a social setting. The group is self-regulated to make the group survive. There comes the good or the bad. It means good or bad for the group, not for the individual. A crazy man kills another human, it appears to be evil to the group/society, but it may relieve some pain from the individual to make his/her more strong to survive. Then, it's good for the individual.
People LEARN the good and bad for the society when growing up.
A human is just a live creature controled by nerves and brain. Do you think that your nerves are spiritually good or bad? No good, no bad. When you say good or bad, you are talking the behaviors in a group setting or a social setting. The group is self-regulated to make the group survive. There comes the good or the bad. It means good or bad for the group, not for the individual. A crazy man kills another human, it appears to be evil to the group/society, but it may relieve some pain from the individual to make his/her more strong to survive. Then, it's good for the individual.
People LEARN the good and bad for the society when growing up.
