朋友明天要做DEBATE请大家帮忙..

甜甜果冻

胖妞妞❤猪头慢
注册
2006-08-19
消息
3,710
荣誉分数
74
声望点数
48
某丫头后天要做DEBATE..一点东西都想不出来(又怕丢人)...帮她发个帖子...谢谢CFC的老老少少帮忙给点思路...勿水谢谢....

下面是主题..

that non-renewable fuels should be rationed

那丫头是反方也就是说

non-renewable fuels should not be rationed
 
if we limit the usage of the non-renewable fuels, it'll cause major economical shocks around the globle or countries. reduce out-puts, higher unemployment.
 
最初由 gaze11e 发布
if we limit the usage of the non-renewable fuels, it'll cause major economical shocks around the globle or countries. reduce out-puts, higher unemployment.
这小伙英文具好!找他帮忙没问题的
 
underdeveloped countries will be in more shiet, because they won't have the technolgy to produce
renewable fuelz, or the money to buy 'em
 
最初由 zaizai 发布
这小伙英文具好!找他帮忙没问题的

:blowzy: 一般,一般 friday那天你去了么?
 
最初由 gaze11e 发布
underdeveloped countries will be in more shiet, because they won't have the technolgy to produce
renewable fuelz, or the money to buy 'em


谢谢你..不过..那丫头说...对经济和对人的影响都被她的partner抢掉了...她不知道还有哪个方面可以讲...
 
most of the cars we use uses non-renewable fuelz, if we limit the usage, it be like telling us
to bike ourselves around all the time, and that is just stupid =)
 
貌似人家加拿大最近一直都在提倡骑车出游 ....
 
最主要的就是经济问题, 如果经济不是问题 就没什么好debate的了
 
最初由 gaze11e 发布
最主要的就是经济问题, 如果经济不是问题 就没什么好debate的了


EMMM...坏的是她的PARTNER..说什么要分经济和人还有一个方面讲...

大家发动智慧...看看还有哪个方面可以的...
 
最初由 ⌒ω⌒秣MoО 发布
5555555...

真是嗷嗷一大好人啊````


终于现身不怕丢人了??
 
问题是题目里的should怎么解释了
 
后退
顶部