We should be thankful to CTV for the coverage!

ChinaFarmer

知名会员
注册
2002-12-04
消息
878
荣誉分数
143
声望点数
153
Frankly speaking, it not easy for them to have such guts while the rest are still turning away from us.
 
Agree. It is definitely a hard earned improvement.
 
Agree. It is definitely a hard earned improvement.

我很不喜欢他们报道的口气。上来就是一个“具有讽刺性的是”,后面又说They said is the Tibetan started the violence.好像这是编出来的似的。

我觉得A channel的报道还比较客观。
 
我很不喜欢他们报道的口气。上来就是一个“具有讽刺性的是”,后面又说They said is the Tibetan started the violence.好像这是编出来的似的。

CTV转述华人的声音they said... 算是比较中立的说法,不错了,你不可能指望他们说we believe the tibetan started the voilence。
 
我错了~CTV就是BULLSHIT~以后大家不要信他们~他们拍就打牌子在摄像机后面晃悠!~
 
这的媒体仿佛再说,如果不爽的话,可以再来.国内媒体,和谐为主.说的话,几乎让你无懈可击.毕竟,和谐,稳定压倒一切.
 
我很不喜欢他们报道的口气。上来就是一个“具有讽刺性的是”,后面又说They said is the Tibetan started the violence.好像这是编出来的似的。

我觉得A channel的报道还比较客观。

They say the protest is pro Chinese Government!!!!!! It's so wrong with that!

The protest is about pro Olympic and anti media's bias! not the Chinese government! they equate us with the Chinese government! well, I guess that really helps with Harper government's Chinese spy theory!
 
CTV转述华人的声音they said... 算是比较中立的说法,不错了,你不可能指望他们说we believe the tibetan started the voilence。

你说得有道理。几乎不可能听到他们完全中立的报道。倾向性很明显,从用词到语气,但不高兴也没什么办法。

CTV的报道后面,加上一段一个参议员的话,什么It is China, after all,...

而A-Channel后面加的是卡特的话,反对抵制奥运会。

Ottawa Citizen上的报道,还比较客观。
 
Why should you be thankful to them?
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的