不可否认,摄影师技术很高超。但不PS是不可能的。
下面是关于这张照片的一个跟贴。
---------------------------------- John Falkenstine , January 25, 2007; 09:17 P.M.
Sorry, but as usual, I don't buy into Kitsch photography. This is a poorly manipulated image, with lots of overexposure in the upper R/H corner, more than likely caused by digital manipulation and placement of render lighting. The image has been fudged with so much that virtually all depth of field behind and next to the boy has been totally destroyed. The overall yellowish/greenish tint is a dead giveaway that the image is overmanipulated. Folks, why don't you take time for a closer look at these images before falling all over yourselves with the mate rating? Now in the end here, I am not posting this to be offensive to the taker of this image. My emphasis would have been on not playing so much digitally with this image and instead making a serious effort to take a good image in the first place. While the composition is nice, the exposure quality of the original image appears to have been NOT nice, perhaps with a poor exposure reading locked in and using the camera more to take snapshot images.
Rarindra Prakarsa, Nov 28, 2006; 03:16 a.m.
Tank you very much for choose my picture as a discussion material. [sorry for bad English]. This was taken near my home at a small lake in West Jakarta. The weather was very good at the day and I imagined that it would be nice if the net is goldy and the background is dark. But actually the background was not as dark as you see in my pic.
I set my camera at 1/500 f5,6, WB: shade. Then I edited in PS with some burn at backgound so the light upper right is so dramatic and more bright. I choose selective colour (blue) for his cloting for higher blue and reduce some yellow. Some dodge at clothing too. I got the blue-yellow contrast overall my pic. I really dont know if this technic "manipulated" or "unmanipulated". I am new here (PN). But all elements here is actual. I just darken-lighten at some area. Tank you.