心里阴暗的人看到的大多是阴暗面

顶! 那种论调就是典型的人民日报海外版. 中国的政治体制改革之所以几十年如一日原地踏步就是因为像LZ这样的人太多. 一有人批评老共他们首先想到就是如何护短而不是看看批评得有没有道理. 这些人在这发了这么多贴了, 除了歌功颂德还是歌功颂德, 麻烦楼主找出一篇以前发过的"建设性"的贴子让大家瞻仰瞻仰?
想想也好笑,你说他们是际德利益者吧,也不象。共党也真有牛的地方,让他们和他们的父辈上山下乡吃苦头,把他们精神阉割,可越折磨他们,他们还越支持土共。很好的一个课题让心理学家研究啊:)
 
想想也好笑,你说他们是际德利益者吧,也不象。共党也真有牛的地方,让他们和他们的父辈上山下乡吃苦头,把他们精神阉割,可越折磨他们,他们还越支持土共。很好的一个课题让心理学家研究啊:)
心理学家早研究过了,叫斯特哥尔摩综合症
 
把本应该为自己服务的仆人当成了自己的家长(或者父母),把本应该做主人的自己硬当成仆人的小孩,逻辑混乱成这样还长篇大论个啥。

世界上有哪个政府做到人民公仆了吗?要是美国选总统是选仆人,你以为奥巴马会参选吗?
 
世界上有哪个政府做到人民公仆了吗?要是美国选总统是选仆人,你以为奥巴马会参选吗?

公仆是从纳税人那里拿薪水,奥巴马为何不参选?他可是上赶子地讨好纳税人的,求大家给他这碗儿饭吃,他不好好干的话,下一届准玩儿完,就这么简单。
 
你要真心为中国好就别支持不称职的政府折腾祖国,它犯了错误,没那个能力把中国搞好就滚蛋让贤,别用枪炮保卫自己的位子。他做出成绩是应该的,犯了错误就要承担责任,否则纳税人养它干什么。 -- 还有,我也很希望你能针对政府提出建设性意见和建议来,不过不知道他们会不会鸟你。

治国这么大的事是个无限庞大的优化问题,我何德何能,哪里有什么建设性的意见?相信你们这些整天在CFC骂娘的也未必比我高明到哪里。

当然无知者无畏,你们这帮没文化的可能还以为自己挺行呢。
 
世界上有哪个政府做到人民公仆了吗?要是美国选总统是选仆人,你以为奥巴马会参选吗?
我建议你从明君圣主的世界里抬起头来,看看300年前卢梭写的《社会契约论》,你就应该明白政府和人民应该是什么样的主人与仆人的关系。
 
治国这么大的事是个无限庞大的优化问题,我何德何能,哪里有什么建设性的意见?相信你们这些整天在CFC骂娘的也未必比我高明到哪里。

当然无知者无畏,你们这帮没文化的可能还以为自己挺行呢。
我没说我何德何能,所以我不会硬逼着别人说自己能,赖在位子上不下来,没有那个金刚钻,就别揽那个瓷器活。坐了国家领导的位子,还不让人挑毛病?
 
心理学家早研究过了,叫斯特哥尔摩综合症
Development

While there is still disagreement as to what factors characterize incidents that contribute to the development of Stockholm syndrome, research has suggested that hostages may exhibit the condition in situations that feature captors who do not abuse the victim, a long duration before resolution, continued contact between the perpetrator and hostage, and a high level of emotion. In fact, experts have concluded that the intensity, not the length of the incident, combined with a lack of physical abuse more likely will create favorable conditions for the development of Stockholm syndrome.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-1" class="reference">[1]</sup>
The following are viewed as the conditions necessary for Stockholm syndrome to occur.
  • Hostages who develop Stockholm syndrome often view the perpetrator as giving life by simply not taking it. In this sense, the captor becomes the person in control of the captive’s basic needs for survival and the victim’s life itself.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-2" class="reference">[1]</sup>
  • The hostage endures isolation from other people and has only the captor’s perspective available. Perpetrators routinely keep information about the outside world’s response to their actions from captives to keep them totally dependent.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-3" class="reference">[1]</sup>
  • The hostage taker threatens to kill the victim and gives the perception of having the capability to do so. The captive judges it safer to align with the perpetrator, endure the hardship of captivity, and comply with the captor than to resist and face murder.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-4" class="reference">[1]</sup>
  • The captive sees the perpetrator as showing some degree of kindness. Kindness serves as the cornerstone of Stockholm syndrome; the condition will not develop unless the captor exhibits it in some form toward the hostage. However, captives often misinterpret a lack of abuse as kindness and may develop feelings of appreciation for this perceived benevolence. If the captor is purely evil and abusive, the hostage will respond with hatred. But, if perpetrators show some kindness, victims will submerge the anger they feel in response to the terror and concentrate on the captors’ “good side” to protect themselves.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-5" class="reference">[1]</sup>
In cases where Stockholm syndrome has occurred, the captive is in a situation where the captor has stripped nearly all forms of independence and gained control of the victim’s life, as well as basic needs for survival. Some experts say that the hostage regresses to, perhaps, a state of infancy; the captive must cry for food, remain silent, and exist in an extreme state of dependence. In contrast, the perpetrator serves as a 'mother' figure protecting the 'child' from a threatening outside world, including law enforcement’s deadly weapons. The victim then begins a struggle for survival, both relying on and identifying with the captor. Possibly, hostages’ motivation to live outweighs their impulse to hate the person who created their dilemma.<sup id="cite_ref-FBI_bulletin_0-6" class="reference">[1]</sup><sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference">[6]</sup>
In many cases, capture may also involve the killing (or threat of killing) of the captive's relatives, thereby isolating the captive. The captive is subjected to isolation and so sees even a small act, such as providing amenities, as a great favour. Such captives may side with their captors while believing their captors have conferred on them great importance and love. Furthermore, captives who perceive themselves as the only members of their group not to have been killed may believe that they have been shown a special interest. <sup class="Template-Fact" title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from November 2009" style="white-space: nowrap;">[citation needed]</sup>
 
我建议你从明君圣主的世界里抬起头来,看看300年前卢梭写的《社会契约论》,你就应该明白政府和人民应该是什么样的主人与仆人的关系。

应该是怎么样是一回事。
现实是怎么样是另一件事。
怎么才能有效的从现实走向理想又是一件事。
 
我就是觉得中国许多地方不尽如人意~而且感觉是体制性的~
 
应该是怎么样是一回事。
现实是怎么样是另一件事。
怎么才能有效的从现实走向理想又是一件事。
从现实慢慢走向理想当然很好,但是人家拼命的掩盖理想,不让大家看见理想,你怎么去走?全国人民都已经过河了,干部还在河里假装摸石头怎么办?
 
从现实慢慢走向理想当然很好,但是人家拼命的掩盖理想,不让大家看见理想,你怎么去走?全国人民都已经过河了,干部还在河里假装摸石头怎么办?

体制的改变不是朝夕之间的事。美好的理想不会被永远压住。等到体制的弊端真正束缚生产力的时候,等到全民族的素质都足够高的时候,我想体制想不改也不行。今天的中国那么多人小学都没毕业,他们有多少能力选择自己的政府?如果真正想为中国的未来做点事,我觉得帮助中国普及教育才是根本。
 
后退
顶部