A comment to the article (ZT):
Justin
· 4 hours ago
On one hand, multiculturalism is supposed to be embraced - yet what it seems to have become is TOLERANCE at best, but often thinly veiled mutual disregard for other cultures.
We can't have multiple parallel cultures running around not interacting with each other - ESPECIALLY at universities - a place where culture and mutual understanding and learning should be disseminated. If they say children are the future, our separation is setting a dangerous precedent for the future of Canada.
However i'm hopeful that Canadians will learn not just to tolerate, but to accept and EMBRACE each other's cultural and value differences. Instilling a sense of genuine curiosity and interest in each other's cultures not only strengthens bonds, but helps to bridge the gap and unify us as Canadians.
Yet this article has obviously stirred up some strong sentiments - you can definitely say it made all the racists come out of the woodwork - but is this article completely invalid? It certainly picks and chooses whose perspectives to lean on - but how many people share even just a little bit of the same sentiment? I feel as
this issue is a hot-button one that as Canadians we are somewhat afraid to directly acknowledge.
Immigration has never been tension-free in any society. It is human tendency for the established class to gravitate towards highlighting differences and creating a sense of "otherness" of those who are arriving. Our two (Canada / US) countries may have been founded, or changed their laws to accomodate these principles. Yet despite having all been immigrants once - expect for the indigenous peoples (and look what we did to them!), people feel entitled to resent their differences.
Now i believe we are at the point where the immigrant presence - smart, hardworking and driven - has reached a critical mass where the established majority feel genuinely threatened. Never has an influx of immigrants been able to alter the cultural landscape of higher learning to the extent which we've experienced.
For those who complain that they can't keep up - because they're either unwilling to, or unable to work as hard due to an entitled (and inferior) work ethic - it really sucks for you.
The meritocratic system may have worked to keep out minorities and immigrants in the past - but it's now backfiring. Immigrants know that education is the key to upwards social mobility - and guess what - immigrants are willing to make those sacrifices. Unless you're indigenous, every Canadian's ancestors once were in the exact same situation as you. Regardless of race. Regardless of religion. Things are much better now. At least racism is systemic and government-enforced.
My ancestors had to pay the Chinese Head Tax, just for the privilege of aspiring to a better life for their children. And you know what? Their HUGE sacrifices allowed for their children - my parents - to gain a foothold in this country - by how? Education. I look at my dad and his brother and sister. They grew up in the poorest area of Edmonton. What are they now? A Lawyer, a neurologist, and a pharmacist. And guess what? They did it in a time where such opportunities were even harder to obtain. Not a day goes by when I am not appreciative of the sacrifices made by previous generations so i can enjoy a comfortable, Canadian upbringing. And it's disappointing for people of any ethnic background to forget that once upon a time, their ancestors were in the same boat. Because losing sight of that causes the complacency and entitlement that is part of the problem here.
Changing the rules and system at this point would basically admit to everyone that there is a double standard here. And that would not fly in today's Canada.
So thus is the dilemma. Under multiculturalism, which i previously commented on, our differences are becoming increasingly divisive. As Canadians we are scared to admit there is a problem which needs to be addressed. Admitting there is a problem will ignite a firestorm, sure, but until we do that our opportunities for open and progressive dialogue are limited.